Apple 12 years after Steve Jobs death doesn’t remotely resemble the 2011 version of Apple. Tim Cook is not Steve Jobs, there was only one Steve Jobs. Lamenting and reminiscing about how things were done in the past won’t change how Apple is currently being run and Apple won’t be the same in 2035 as it is now. I miss the old Apple selling the IIc and IIgs. Well, that Apple of my childhood is dead and buried, time to move on.The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
I guarantee that not one tech “nerd” on this forum would want a single tv manufacturer selling just two sizes of one level of HDTV and saying that your choice is to pay up or go back to standard def.Not really. I have nostalgia for that period in time and in tech where smartphones were a lot less standardised and companies were experimenting with new ideas, but the one-size-fits-all approach was bad even then. I remember arguing here on MacRumors that Apple should release an option with a larger display and being told I was an idiot because no human hand could possibly reach across a display larger than the 3.5” one at the time. Now we have (mostly) sizes and specs that everyone can be happy with (bring back the Mini, Tim, you coward).
There’s no way you could par back the current iPhone line in a way that wouldn’t be objectively worse for a significant number of people.
The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
I see a phone that doesn’t fit into the pocket.
I remember the early days fondly too, but that is the nature of the past. Apple has moved on, society has moved on. Even if Steve Jobs would still be around, he (especially) would have moved on as well…The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
True. Sometimes you upgrade to the latest OS and bugs from the past return.The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
There's about an inch that does not. The rest of it is in there and because the width of the pocket is just about the width of the phone it's a snug fit.I see a phone that doesn’t fit into the pocket.![]()
You hit the nail on the head of why Apple is kinda rubbish today. Steve made a personal connection with the customers with his keynotes (irony considering his reputation). Tim comes off as a car salesman and the rest of his tribe are ding dongs.Only thing I miss are the keynotes.
I don’t like the overly polished pop style keynotes they produce nowadays which are supposed to appeal to younger folks. With Jobs, granted the Apple esthetics were more skeuomorphic, the presentations felt more life like and rough, relatable on a personal level, not made for young folks to make them feel like they’re part of, whatever.
Apart from that no I don’t miss much.
People complain about how Apple is (still) stubborn in some aspects but then glorify old Apple and Jobs. There are many things Jobs probably wouldn’t have liked like the Shortcuts app or, like you said, choices in screen and storage size and perhaps colors.
Things that the market obviously appreciates. So I don’t see a benefit going back to a time that we should all be happy have long passed. Good at the times, but not feasible today.
I promise, they don’t only appeal to younger folks. This is a classic case of “I don’t like it so it must be for kids”.Only thing I miss are the keynotes.
I don’t like the overly polished pop style keynotes they produce nowadays which are supposed to appeal to younger folks.
Not me 😊 Tim and his team have been doing a great job creating amazing iPhone choices and features targeting various consumer demographic iPhone type needs. I am a very satisfied iPhone user and Apple products. Keep calm and be happy with current Apple offerings. Life is too short to be unhappy with anything😊The lineup was very compact - two to three storage options and comes in two colours. That’s it. Along with the skeumorphic design of iOS, the entire experience, for me, was enjoyable. iOS was limited but it performs at its best at what it’s designed to do. I’ve never clamoured for a software fix when iOS 6 dropped in 2012.
These days we have an ‘iPhone for everyone’ approach. It made Apple a lot of money and in my opinion, this would be Cook’s legacy - making Apple products mainstream. In contrast to Jobs’ approach of making the best products for those who are loyal to Apple and believe in their process.
However, such mass appeal comes with a price. People are hesitant to upgrade to new OSes, Apple releases some new features but also introduces tens of bugs which may take days to months to fix, a bloated product lineup that lacks focus - the blatant removal of previous Pro iPhones to ensure it doesn’t undercut the latest Pro models but they’re happy to keep last year’s or the year before’s base iPhones. The product lineup may generate a lot of revenue but from an Apple sheep, it seems very ‘out of focus’. I’m not saying we should move backwards. But I long for the day where iOS fixes all the bugs for inconsistencies from previous years and perhaps introduce a much condense product lineup that benefits the users such as - not having a 14 Plus and a 15 Plus available side by side in their official stores.
I never had an issue when at one time, all we had was the 6 Plus, 6, 5S. If someone wants a larger screen, they also get the best camera, resolution, battery life.