This has been a very interesting thread for me to read. I've been pulling my hair out
over the past 2 months as I go back and forth between 24" iMac and a 2.66 Mac Pro with 23" CD. As of late I have been squarely on side with spending the extra money to get the Mac Pro -- mostly for the longevity and upgradeability that it will provide. I had all but written off the 24" iMac.
Maybe you guys can answer me this -- Is there a lot of difference between a 23" cinema display and the built in display in the 24" iMac? I have been told that they are night and day. I just took a second to compare the technical specs on the two displays and they appear identical -- resolution, contrast ratio, brightness...all the same. Does apple make the display in the iMac.
The other big difference that someone brought up for me was 32 bit vs. 64 bit. The architecture in the Mac Pro is truely 64 bit vs. 32 bit in the iMac. I'm talking out of my a$$ a bit here as I'm not the most technically adept geek on the block...but 64 is clearly a bigger number than 32
. Will operating systems and software of the near future embrace 64 bit making the iMac seem dated before it's time.
These last two paragraphs capsulize the main reasons why I was leaning toward the Mac Pro. If anyone can debunk my preconceptions I'm happy to consider any and all opinions.
Cheers,
darren