I feel the same way. I want to test it on a MacBook as well. I appreciate user reviews from forums like these, I don't trust them.
Some people say it's sooooo slooooow, some say it's "very usable" (rather ambiguous), while some say it's fast. What's "fast"? Fast compared to Textedit (ie: as fast as it gets), or faster than before? Faster than Lightroom?
You're right about Aperture on Macs in the showroom. I've never been to an official "Apple Store", but the reseller near my house doesn't have Aperture installed on ANY of their current Macs, including their Mac Pro with 30" screen.
Too bad.
Basically, I want to re-evaluate Aperture on a MacBook before I consider managing my photos with it and moving everything over. I tried Aperture on another Mac before, and it was like version 1.2 or something, so I'm sure the game is different now.
Lightroom is great and I operate very very quickly when using it, but I still want to try out Aperture before I move all my photos to Lightroom. It's too hard to make another big move over to another program after I commit to Lightroom (forever!?).
You're right about Aperture on Macs in the showroom. I've never been to an official "Apple Store", but the reseller near my house doesn't have Aperture installed on ANY of their current Macs, including their Mac Pro with 30" screen.
Basically, I want to re-evaluate Aperture on a MacBook before I consider managing my photos with it and moving everything over. I tried Aperture on another Mac before, and it was like version 1.2 or something, so I'm sure the game is different now.
Lightroom is great and I operate very very quickly when using it, but I still want to try out Aperture before I move all my photos to Lightroom. It's too hard to make another big move over to another program after I commit to Lightroom (forever!?).