Chrome is using its monopoly status to boycott JPEG XL, while Safari adopts it first.Web developers don't even bother to develop for Safari, never mind this.
Chrome is using its monopoly status to boycott JPEG XL, while Safari adopts it first.Web developers don't even bother to develop for Safari, never mind this.
I'm guessing this is sarcasm. It's good to use /s when you aren't clear (although if you are well known as sarcastic on the forums I apologize)."for Vision Pro Users" or "for The Vision Pro User" ?
Ironically this is partially true, but not for the reasons that you may think. It's not due to a fault of Safari as a modern-age browser. Often, web app developers are stuck in a rut of doing browser detection, don't have a Mac to test Safari with, so they "prevent" Safari from accessing the site at all, or don't fix issues to make their app work well in Safari.
Safari is an excellent modern browser with industry-leading performance, great ecosystem support, and sensible (non-proprietary) web standards support. I appreciate Apple's conservative approach to moving the browser forward.
You can thank Safari for helping to break us free from Internet Explorer's death grip.
I feel the same way and find the possibilities offered by Spatial Media Toolkit (for macOS) for converting 2D videos a mindblowing addition. Also, the free adjustment of depth on images sometimes produces more convincing results than Apple did in its first release. I'm sure Apple is optimizing to comp(l)ete.The ability to turn any photo into spatial on visionOS has become one of my favourite things to do on Vision Pro. I find myself browsing for long lengths of time just looking at photos and memories after adding depth to them.
3d tv only needed only light weight glasses, how is a bigger and heavier headset; a better experience? Saying so doesn't make it so.It does. It really does.
Have you tried using a VR headset yourself?3d tv only needed only light weight glasses, how is a bigger and heavier headset; a better experience? Saying so doesn't make it so.
Yes, and yes. Quite humorous. I back that up with the dozen Vision Pros behind me that are also laughing softlyYou think this is cute? Or funny? It's not, truly.
If the wearing of hardware were the whole of the experience, you might have a point.3d tv only needed only light weight glasses, how is a bigger and heavier headset; a better experience? Saying so doesn't make it so.
Need MLS/NBA streaming.
After that? Pricing be damned, it'll sell.
I'm in favor of anything that can encourage more people to explore spatial video and audio.
I'm a long-time VR enthusiast but recent Vision Pro buyer. I've only had my AVP for about a week. But I've been buying headsets since the Oculus DK2.
Personal, spatial videos were the standout surprise for me now that I've had a chance to use the AVP more. I was surprised at how deeply emotional spatial videos can be when their subject is someone or something dear to me. I can already tell that a decade from now these videos are going to tap into my nostalgia like no photo or flat video ever has for me.
Even if you think the AVP is a flawed, junker of a product I think that this form of media will absolutely have a role in our future tech lives. It's that powerful. If you're carrying an iPhone that can take spatial photos and video I think you should take some every now and then. Especially when you're with family and those you love. I think future you will be glad you did.
You know 3d tv failed, why would adding a headset and hand gestures make it better?
The ability to turn any photo into spatial on visionOS has become one of my favourite things to do on Vision Pro. I find myself browsing for long lengths of time just looking at photos and memories after adding depth to them.
I feel the same way and find the possibilities offered by Spatial Media Toolkit (for macOS) for converting 2D videos a mindblowing addition. Also, the free adjustment of depth on images sometimes produces more convincing results than Apple did in its first release. I'm sure Apple is optimizing to comp(l)ete.
When the ai fake spatial effect works it works really well, but it has some significant shortcomings with some photos. Look for things like reflections in windows. Some photos just lack real depth and instead look like a bunch of flat things in space. An actual spatial photo taken with the hardware cameras will always look better. And that same hardware is the only thing that makes spatial video possible, where there is no ai solution (yet?).ANY old pic from the good ol Apple photo app camera roll can be converted and viewed spatially???!!!!….that halfway 3d effect??? Then why have special lenses at all And not just any ol photo can be one…it takes time to convert so for convenience sake?…
lol this forum is unrealYou think this is cute? Or funny? It's not, truly.
-erased-surprised you didn’t say NFL…maaaan if only that Apple TV NFL deal went through and not that goddamn Smoogle/youtube : (
That’s premium seating. Comfort of the crib, spatial 3d game day experience at the 50 yahd Line…Jesus mary n joseph
Why does smoogle have to infect everything it seems. 😷
Speak that truth!!! AMEN!!!!!!!!
🫵🏽🙌🏽👏🏽👐🏽🤜🏽👊🏽🙏🏽
that pron biz would like to have a word w you…
WAIT WAIT.
ANY old pic from the good ol Apple photo app camera roll can be converted and viewed spatially???!!!!….that halfway 3d effect??? Then why have special lenses at all And not just any ol photo can be one…it takes time to convert so for convenience sake?…
so with this toolkit any video taken w iPhone from before the 15 can convert into spatial??….
----
WAIT WAIT.
ANY old pic from the good ol Apple photo app camera roll can be converted and viewed spatially???!!!!….that halfway 3d effect??? Then why have special lenses at all And not just any ol photo can be one…it takes time to convert so for convenience sake?…
---
Web developers don't even bother to develop for Safari, never mind this.
Vision Pro users will soon be able to view spatial photos and videos in Safari, according to PetaPixel. The photography site did an interview with Apple product manager Della Huff and designer Billy Sorrentino, who shared that Apple is bringing spatial photo and spatial video support to Safari.
![]()
Later this year, web developers will be able to add spatial photos and videos to their websites, which will be viewable in 3D on the Vision Pro.
Spatial photos and videos can be captured with the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, as well as all four iPhone 16 models and the Vision Pro itself. Note that spatial photo support for the iPhone 15 Pro is coming in iOS 18.1, set to be released next week. With Vision Pro and visionOS 2, even existing photos can have added depth.
As of right now, spatial photos and videos can only be viewed on Vision Pro when they're sent to you directly via Messages, email, or AirDrop, which makes it difficult to see content from other people. Browser support for spatial videos and photos will let iPhone users upload their content to websites where anyone with a Vision Pro can see it in 3D.
For those without a Vision Pro, spatial photos and videos will look like standard media embeds. "Once you embedded spatial content, folks who are on Vision Pro are getting spatial and folks who are just looking at it on their laptop see it in two dimensions," Sorrentino told PetaPixel.
There is no word on exactly when spatial photo and video support will be coming to Safari, but it is expected before the end of the year so it could be included in a visionOS 2.2 update.
Article Link: Apple Bringing Spatial Photo and Video Support to Safari for Vision Pro Users
Right, both!You think this is cute? Or funny?