i don’t know about you people but everything Tim says reflects no vision at ALL. They don’t know what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. They’re just doing things because they can and that internet said they’re cool.
I think Steve knew exactly who Tim was and that's why he chose him to succeed him. He believed Apple needed an operations oriented executive to propel Apple to where it is today.
Tim has now been at the helm of Apple for longer than Steve was in his "second act" (1997-2010/2011)
There’s a reason for that. The board has other qualities it looks for than MR members.[…[
Tim has now been at the helm of Apple for longer than Steve was in his "second act" (1997-2010/2011)
I think apple is in a good place. Although the “apple is doomed” crowd would disagree.Depending upon ones perspective, where we are now is at least a little bit sad -- I know it is to me
[…]
It's time for some new blood, for sure. It's surprising the antagonism here toward those who want Apple to be amazing and continue to innovate. They seem to believe that increased passion and vision is at odds with their personal portfolio.
Try putting a flashlight on it close to the screen and inspect it in a dark room. You'd be surprised.This is the first I have heard of that issue, my MacBook Pro screen looks perfect as does my work MacBook Pro screen.
The move to Apple silicon is still criminally understated and not fully understood how dramatically Apple has set up its future.Right?
It's been a tremendous, long, run for Tim, but we can't just do this level of barely iterating forever ... and sadly, there have been as many misses as hits
The batting average needs to be higher (for things that make it to public release) and we need some swinging for the fences, not just constantly bunting and sac-flies to try and squeeze out some base runner movement
Really? FCP is awful, Photos borderline unusable. Need dongles for everything. No professional engineering software even supports the mac. No CAD programs. When they announced Metal, it was supposed to be this gaming rush to the Mac; that never happened. Gaming has never been good on a mac and has only gotten worse. Purchased a brand new maxed out Mac mini M4 Pro and have had (6) tech support calls since Saturday for things like random crashing, error code 36 disc read errors, desktop not responding, monitors switching place after wake from sleep, and so forth. Basically unusable and completely unreliable. FCP library issues where relinking media fails and senior Apple support cannot figure out the cause. Logic and FCP plugins not functional on the M4. Aside from web browsing and checking email, what use case would you propose for a computer that behaves this way? Windows is just worlds faster, snappier, video editing lightning fast and supported by dozens of software companies. Sequoia finally got window snapping but its sluggish and requires more clicks to get the windows where you want them. I dont see this as progress. Sure the M series CPU's are energy efficient, but an AMD or i9 will literally run circles around them paired with a good graphics card. My gaming computer CPU scores a 59,554 compared to the maxed out M4 Pro at 38,419. The M2 Ultra Mac Studio scores a 50,409 which is still slower, but the price is more than twice what I paid for better performance from the PC.That's just nonsense.
There’s a reason for that. The board has other qualities it looks for than MR members.
I think apple is in a good place. Although the “apple is doomed” crowd would disagree.
What’s worse than Tim turning into gelsinger is a gelsinger taking over when Tim leaves.Yeah, the Apple is doomed crowd is as wrong headed as the Apple can do no wrong crowd. I would guess that, excluding trolls, most Apple users are somewhere in the upper middle, an 8 or a 9 out of 10 crowd for judging Apple's health.
The thing that worries me is Tim seems to not be considering retirement in the near term according to the interview. I hope the board doesn't wait till Apple has a Gelsinger moment.
auto cad, vector works, archicad, fusion 360, Rhino. You are right, no CAD.Really? FCP is awful, Photos borderline unusable. Need dongles for everything. No professional engineering software even supports the mac. No CAD programs. When they announced Metal, it was supposed to be this gaming rush to the Mac; that never happened. Gaming has never been good on a mac and has only gotten worse. Purchased a brand new maxed out Mac mini M4 Pro and have had (6) tech support calls since Saturday for things like random crashing, error code 36 disc read errors, desktop not responding, monitors switching place after wake from sleep, and so forth. Basically unusable and completely unreliable. FCP library issues where relinking media fails and senior Apple support cannot figure out the cause. Logic and FCP plugins not functional on the M4. Aside from web browsing and checking email, what use case would you propose for a computer that behaves this way? Windows is just worlds faster, snappier, video editing lightning fast and supported by dozens of software companies. Sequoia finally got window snapping but its sluggish and requires more clicks to get the windows where you want them. I dont see this as progress. Sure the M series CPU's are energy efficient, but an AMD or i9 will literally run circles around them paired with a good graphics card. My gaming computer CPU scores a 59,554 compared to the maxed out M4 Pro at 38,419. The M2 Ultra Mac Studio scores a 50,409 which is still slower, but the price is more than twice what I paid for better performance from the PC.
Absolutely agree!Tim Cook sees his main job as maximizing profits for shareholders by giving customers less user-friendly products than when Steve Jobs was CEO. Jobs should have made Scott Forstall CEO. Forstall wouldn't have made Apple anywhere as much money as Cook, but the products created under Forstall would've been more innovative and more user-friendly.
Forstall is a visionary. He is the mastermind behind Mac OS X and iOS. His skeuomorphic design gave visual cues that made it easier for childern who have never used a computer, and for elderly people who have never used a computer, to learn how to use a computer.
Forstall was the most Jobs-like person at Apple. The fact that Cook fired him shows that Cook didn't really know how valuable Jobs was. If Cook knew how valuable Jobs was, then Cook wouldn't have fired Apple's most Jobs-like person.
Wow, Scott, you brought it STRONG with your MacRumors burner account!Tim Cook sees his main job as maximizing profits for shareholders by giving customers less user-friendly products than when Steve Jobs was CEO. Jobs should have made Scott Forstall CEO. Forstall wouldn't have made Apple anywhere as much money as Cook, but the products created under Forstall would've been more innovative and more user-friendly.
Forstall is a visionary. He is the mastermind behind Mac OS X and iOS. His skeuomorphic design gave visual cues that made it easier for childern who have never used a computer, and for elderly people who have never used a computer, to learn how to use a computer.
Forstall was the most Jobs-like person at Apple. The fact that Cook fired him shows that Cook didn't really know how valuable Jobs was. If Cook knew how valuable Jobs was, then Cook wouldn't have fired Apple's most Jobs-like person.
I also agree with this 100%. Ive took things way too far. Scott's design taste was impeccable.Tim Cook sees his main job as maximizing profits for shareholders by giving customers less user-friendly products than when Steve Jobs was CEO. Jobs should have made Scott Forstall CEO. Forstall wouldn't have made Apple anywhere as much money as Cook, but the products created under Forstall would've been more innovative and more user-friendly.
Forstall is a visionary. He is the mastermind behind Mac OS X and iOS. His skeuomorphic design gave visual cues that made it easier for childern who have never used a computer, and for elderly people who have never used a computer, to learn how to use a computer.
Forstall was the most Jobs-like person at Apple. The fact that Cook fired him shows that Cook didn't really know how valuable Jobs was. If Cook knew how valuable Jobs was, then Cook wouldn't have fired Apple's most Jobs-like person.