Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The problem I see when reading this is that most people seem to really want a Quad Core Mac Pro at iMac prices. Or the fabled X-Mac and that isn't going to happen.

If you want multiple HDD's and more graphic options then you aren't in the iMac Market. You are in the Mac Pro market or you're getting a PC. I have two iMacs at the house, but the Octo Core Mac Pro does all the real
work.

Most people don't need the Xeons that's in the Mac Pros and definitely not for 2700$. Mac Pros are overkill for majority of people and iMac is nearly perfect for us except it could use more stuff in it, which is why this topic was created, to see what people want in their iMac.

There are cheap quad processors that fits iMac's market. Granted, most people probably still don't need quad cores but Intel is practically getting rid of the dualcore and replacing it with quadcore at same price point.

If Apple could make it easy to replace HDs and go for upgradable graphic cards, it would sell craploads more units than ever in their history.

Apple can produce Mac Pros at cheaper prices by replacing the Xeons with the consumer-graded CPUs like quadcore core duo or the Core i5/i7. Just dropping the price to 1500-2000$ will be enough to satisfy people who are searching for the "xMac".


Apple was a lil slow to adopt 2.0 though, so who knows. Although I think I did remember Linux would be the first OS to effectively have drivers available, so who knows, how hard would the transition from Linux driver to OSX driver be?

It has nothing to do with drivers, Apple could develop the drivers anytime they want. The drivers are useless if you have nothing to use it with. They have to wait for the USB 3.0 host controllers to be developed and tested and than mass produce it. Once the controllers are ready, than the motherboard chipsets have to be developed with it built in so that Apple can use it in the next product line. Those all takes time.
 
Apart from the obvious - faster processor, more RAM, bigger HDD - i would like to see an eSata port, a couple of extra USB ports (both placed by the power button, on the left side of the computer, where there is room for more connectors), and an SD card reader opposite the DVD (above the aforementioned ports).

I would also love to see a BR drive, (DVD drives are yesterdays news), a user serviceable design (kinda like the iMac G5), and if possible USB 3.0 and Firewire S3200.
Instead of adding more USB ports on the back, why not relent and put a port or two on the front? It's annoying to plug a flash drive into the back of the iMac. While they're at it, they should restore a headphone jack to the front as there was on the original gumdrop iMac.

RAM and hard disks should be user-serviceable on every machine. It's ridiculous how difficult it is to get to either in the current design. (RAM is doable, but awkward with the foot in the way.)
 
Instead of adding more USB ports on the back, why not relent and put a port or two on the front? It's annoying to plug a flash drive into the back of the iMac. While they're at it, they should restore a headphone jack to the front as there was on the original gumdrop iMac.

RAM and hard disks should be user-serviceable on every machine. It's ridiculous how difficult it is to get to either in the current design. (RAM is doable, but awkward with the foot in the way.)

I think it is because Apple doesn't like how the front ports mess up the "beautiful" design of iMacs. I would be more happy of they just put it on the side instead of front including the headphone jack. Putting stuff on the front will also annoy people who has a keyboard in front of iMac, the cables will only get in the way.
 
The problem I see when reading this is that most people seem to really want a Quad Core Mac Pro at iMac prices.
It depends on the quad-core, but they are in the same price zone as the more expensive dual-cores used in the iMac. With the 65 W desktop quad-cores, you pretty much get double the cores for a similar price.

I don't know how much slimmer they can go before they'll be forced to use ULV processors.
A lot slimmer, since the iMac (24") can handle 55 W and even the MacBook Air uses LV CPUs. If they use Arrandale, they could go thinner because Arrandale may top out at 35 W (25 W Penryn equivalent). But that means that if cheaper (than the $3xx of Penryn and Clarksfield) quad-cores come at 45 W, Apple won't use those.

There are cheap quad processors that fits iMac's market. Granted, most people probably still don't need quad cores but Intel is practically getting rid of the dualcore and replacing it with quadcore at same price point.
They did that with the high-end mobile CPUs but it looks like the current price boundary between dual-core and quad-core will stay with Clarksfield. Dual cores at the low-end will stay through 2011 but it's not known what prices they will top out at. We could still see dual-core MacBook Pros and iMacs in 2011.
 
I think it totally makes sense to have dual cores at the low end particularly with Arrandale which will still offer threading so it'll appear like a quad core to the OS.

Apple's move to Grand Central Dispatch is being understated by most IMO. When you look at the influence of this new API in Snow Leopard it's amazing because it's everywhere. Xcode and Instruments and more all support GCD.

The time where we said "well most people aren't going to benefit from quad core or more" is rapidly coming to a close.

Yes they've had concurrency tools before and those still exist but GCD makes it easier than it's likely to ever get to get concurrent programming in SL apps without the extra code bloat and management headache.

I wouldn't buy an iMac without Quad-core knowing Snow Leopard is coming.
 
I hope so, and with Intel's new branding which removes the dual/quad suffixes, maybe Apple won't have to go into core counts and clock speeds (which removes half the reasons for no quad-core).
 
Here's what I want:

1. Quad core, like most others.

2. OLED or LED screen.

4. Matching keyboard and mouse.

5. New design, i.e. lose the chin.

6. User serviceable HHD.

7. Height adjustment and wall mountable.
 
It has nothing to do with drivers, Apple could develop the drivers anytime they want. The drivers are useless if you have nothing to use it with. They have to wait for the USB 3.0 host controllers to be developed and tested and than mass produce it. Once the controllers are ready, than the motherboard chipsets have to be developed with it built in so that Apple can use it in the next product line. Those all takes time.

Host controllers, that was it, I knew it was something along those lines :p

"The holy wall of iMacs". Maybe Steve's house is made of different Macs :D

I hear Steves house has no windows... :rolleyes:



I can't believe I just said that...
 
God it looks squat and fat. There is really nothing that appealing about it.

And you think the current iMac looks good?

Apple needs a new design. The chin is, in my opinion, totally unnecessary. The design needs to be something radical, like G3 -> G4 and G4 -> G5. And I thought that an optical drive's performance goes "way down" when it is mounted sideways.
 
I think it is because Apple doesn't like how the front ports mess up the "beautiful" design of iMacs. I would be more happy of they just put it on the side instead of front including the headphone jack. Putting stuff on the front will also annoy people who has a keyboard in front of iMac, the cables will only get in the way.
The side would work as well -- the Dell monitors in most of the computer labs at school have two USB ports on the left side. I just hope they could position them with the logic board in such a way that the innards don't get more complicated than they already are (my boss's iMac had on-site surgery for random shutdowns, and it wasn't pretty -- the on-site guy failed to do the job in three tries, so my boss had to take it to the Apple Store and leave it there for a week or two before he got it back in working condition).
 
imacs

I honestly think that if they made and imac that looked exactly like their new led screens that would be nice because the screens already have speakers usb ports what do you guys think:confused:
 
I honestly think that if they made and imac that looked exactly like their new led screens that would be nice because the screens already have speakers usb ports what do you guys think:confused:

iMacs already have IPS screens, passable built-in speakers and a few USB ports. :rolleyes:
 
iMacs already have IPS screens, passable built-in speakers and a few USB ports. :rolleyes:
I think the poster's point is that he would prefer the design of the LED display and that because the display already contains USB ports and speakers, the poster believes it wouldn't be difficult to add the necessary innards to turn it into a full-fledged iMac. (Somehow I doubt it would be that easy, but it is a nice design, except that THEY PUT THE USB PORTS ON THE BACK! Grr.)
 
I think the poster's point is that he would prefer the design of the LED display and that because the display already contains USB ports and speakers, the poster believes it wouldn't be difficult to add the necessary innards to turn it into a full-fledged iMac. (Somehow I doubt it would be that easy, but it is a nice design, except that THEY PUT THE USB PORTS ON THE BACK! Grr.)

Apple really needs to ditch the thick, black bezels on everything. It looks atrocious and makes extended desktop mode harder to make use of. Someone should make a bezel-less display that would be perfect for extended desktop.
 
Oh.... how i would love to present all of my apple ideas to apple!

I sometimes dream that apple will announce an Imac Pro, 28 inch all silver chassis with a processing frequency of 3.5 ghz (more than likely the i7 quad core) 8gbs of ddr3 ram (with an option for 16gbs) Nvidia GTX 295 GPU.... and a track pad built into the keyboard. Oh and the keyboard is full sized with the numeric functions being accessible through the track pad... Oh and both the keyboard and mouse are new forms of wireless technology that enables them to work without batteries... And the mouse takes the shape and texture of the ipod touch.. basically the ipod touch with specific mouse duties.. (You know that would be awesome!) Blu ray would be ideal....... For some reason i like the idea of a 28 inch led as opposed to the desired 30 inch display... (It just seems more realistic to me...) You like'n that mouse idea aren't you? I am overly in love with the idea... Kensington makes mice that sorta mimmic that smooth texture and shape.. Apple could go where no other mouse has gone B4 by adding interface capabilities on the mouse and giving it that iphone/touch slickness....
 
2 hard drives! or maybe one large 2tb> hard drive. Maybe by 2010 we'll get 4tb drives...
 
I'd be happy with two 2.5" bays.

While I'd love to have 2TB in a Mac at those levels it makes sense for me (a multi Mac household) to have that storage centrally located so that I can access it from multiple computers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.