Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No kidding. I like to see them cutting that budget a bit.
Love reading about the billions spent on that program, while I'm stepping over a homeless person in the city. :rolleyes:

That's like saying that a company can be profitable by firing all their employees.

NASA is more than just a waste of money, and it is more than just inventing mattresses. There are thousands of inventions that have come out of NASA that have vastly improved the private sector, including the private individual. One of the main charters of NASA specifies that any inventions will be released into the private sector for their use, free of charge.

Yes, I feel bad that some people are homeless. Many are there by choice, but many are not. NASA has nothing to do with it.

Maybe instead of spending $600 for a iPhone, if we had all given that to charity, we could eliminate the homeless.

And, quite frankly, I think that it is a huge waste of money for employers to be providing phone hardware to their employees. Maybe it was a good idea when cell phones were not common, but now that even every 5 year old kid has a cell phone, why are employers spending the money on the phones. Turn that over to the users, and just pay for the business usage.

-jt2
 
...One of the main charters of NASA specifies that any inventions will be released into the private sector for their use, free of charge.

Yea? That's your tax money, friend.

NASA has nothing to do with it.

Who's blaming NASA?

Maybe instead of spending $600 for a iPhone, if we had all given that to charity, we could eliminate the homeless.

I'll spend my money (after taxes) as I wish.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Budget
 
This just in: Boeing 747 out, Lockheed Martin space shuttle in for Mars mission.

As others have pointed out, how is it news when a device that wasn't intended for the enterprise is "discovered" to be inadequate for enterprise use?
 
I love my iPhone as much as anyone, but why is it so hard for all the iPhone diehards to admit it is NOT an Enterprise device? It can't do OTA calendaring with Apples own .Mac, let alone Exchange and Notes. It can't do bcc, it can't do sophistcated folder support. It CAN be a great multimedia convergence device which is why I have one, but it never set out to be a corporate warrior's sidearm -- and even insinuating it could play in that space is comparing apples to oranges and is probably not at all in sync with the requirements, needs, and usage patterns of the corporate market.

So, the article is kind of lame, why is it trying to compare the iPhone to a phone not even in the same market?

Maybe in 6-12 months when tried and true solutions come out to fill these gaps the iPhone can play in this space, but until then the iPhone IS NOT a BlackBerry (and a BlackBerry is NOT an iPhone)...

im with this guy
 
The Iphone is great but I dont think its a die hard business phone like the BB's are used/intended for.
Its compering Apple's to oranges :D Good analogy.
It has Itunes, plays videos, movies, checks wether, email, youtube, maps etc...
Its more like a fun phone and not so like corporate business oriented workload cellphones. Im sure NASA's employees could have alot more fun with an Iphone than a blackberry. :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.