Apple have introduced an entry level iPad which sell for less than $400 and it’s a serious piece of kit. OK it’s not up to IPP level but it kicks the opposition into the water and it will get people into the Apple ecosystem so why not a phone?
The SE was proof that people love cheap iPhones. Most people who owned it picked it up because it was cost effective .
They don’t know the difference between a Max, a pixel or a galaxy. All they know is they want an iPhone that is the lowest price.
Interesting stuff. So you’re saying that due to this theory people who buy an iPhone feel better about their purchase because they equate high price with high quality? If the next iPhone was the best ever and it only cost $800, that would impact people’s perception it?Indeed. OP should read about the economic theory of Veblen goods. Some items in the market are expensive because, as price increases, demand for them actually goes up. iPhones are Veblen goods. They're also an aspirational product, i.e. people aspire to be able to purchase an Apple device. Their high price is a big part of their allure.
Apple would lose a big part of their painstakingly built up image of exclusivity and high quality by releasing a low price budget phone.
If you have $500 to buy a phone, Apple has nothing for you except for a phone several years old and refurbished.
Believe me, I know Apple are far smarter than I am, but it is inevitable if they made a $499 phone, they would gain new users by the boatload. I’m sure if Ferrari made a $35k car, it would also be a massive hit with people who have always wanted one but couldn’t afford it.
The SE was proof that people love cheap iPhones. Most people who owned it picked it up because it was cost effective. My buddy works at a phone store, and people come in all the time asking for the cheapest iPhone. They don’t know the difference between a Max, a pixel or a galaxy. All they know is they want an iPhone that is the lowest price. A $499 iPhone would be the best selling phone year in and year out.
Just think of the stress on service centres, a low priced iPhone will cost. More cheap phone sales=more crowd for after sales repair work= more staff required= more waiting=more swearing and online complaints= diminished perceived value of Apple products= more of everything positive and Negative, Apple doesn't have currently.
Maybe Apple doesn't want that.
With Apple wanting to be the best of the best I doubt this would happen. I can't see them making a phone with budget specs / features. The non-techy people wouldn't realise there's a big enough difference to buy the more expensive model and they'd kill sales of their flagships.
Furthermore, if you are suggesting that Apple doesn't want that kind of increase in sales--well sir, you are quite mad.![]()
Just think of the stress on service centres, a low priced iPhone will cost. More cheap phone sales=more crowd for after sales repair work= more staff required= more waiting=more swearing and online complaints= diminished perceived value of Apple products= more of everything positive and Negative, Apple doesn't have currently.
Maybe Apple doesn't want that.
They just want to make money. And after the last 30% decline YOY there comes todays front page rumor of a budget phone for the Asian market...Apple wants the iPhone to be the best. The best always costs more. It's counter-productive for them to be "We will always deliver the best products, but also here's a mediocre phone so that more of you can afford"
I think the 6s receiving updates is going to end with iOS 13.x. It was rumored that they already wouldn't even see 13.x. As hopefull as I am, I'm also realist. The 6s Will be half a decade old at the end of he iOS 13 lifecycle. My Eepecting more than that out of the phone would extreme.Take a cursory look at any carrier's online store, or a big electronics retailer, and you will see you can pick up a brand new 6S for about £299. This isn't old stock, either. Apple are still manufacturing and selling these phones new. This is how Apple targets and reaches the lowest end of smartphone buyers, and I think there's a strong argument that the 6S is in a lot of ways better than the androids you can pick up for similar amounts of money (near flagship grade performance for just one). The 6s will be getting at least another 15 months OS support, and App support should last a good year, two, three even after OS support ends. You get all the benefits of iOS 13, Apple's ecosystem, you're giving up very little in reality aside from a few bells and whistles on newer models. For people looking for a basic, great smartphone experience this is still an excellent option.
It doesn't have a modern camera...That’s exactly what iPhone SE does.
I can only speak for myself. But I don't feel a phone that was sold three years ago has been reduced in price enough to justify $500 for it. That thing is one year older than the 6s And costs only $150 less today than the 6s did brand new. Maybe I'm just cheap lol.Your headline is wrong. It should be "I don't think the iPhone 7 is good enough to be a budget phone but I refuse to explain why I think that."
Because, as written, the iPhone 7 fulfills your original question exactly. It is, in fact, even cheaper than your request.
I think that's exactly what it was. And am legitimately surprised we haven't seen a refresh. Maybe sales weren't where they wants them?So, what was the intention of the SE when it launched in March 2016? Was that not considered a budget/entry-level iPhone? I believe it was. Even if you watch the March 2016 keynote when the SE launched, they specified that the SE was intended to make it as ‘affordable’ as possible, yet include the latest processor (A9) in a smaller compact device.
Hence cost reduction.It doesn't have a modern camera...
My point was that the person you quoted was asking for a modern camera. I understand cost reduction. I was just pointing out that the SE, wasn't, in fact, everything they asked for. Just making convoHence cost reduction.
Would be great to have a stripped down iPhone 7 camera tho.
Possibly, though for people looking in a ~£299 price range I doubt you're getting more than a year of Android support on the other side anyway? If the 6s is left behind on iOS 13 next year, it will still have a good few years App support. So maybe not a great option for someone who wants to buy and keep a long time, but certainly it would get most people through a 2 year contract period.I think the 6s receiving updates is going to end with iOS 13.x. It was rumored that they already wouldn't even see 13.x. As hopefull as I am, I'm also realist. The 6s Will be half a decade old at the end of he iOS 13 lifecycle. My Eepecting more than that out of the phone would extreme.
That would be nice if they did and for $399.00.I played with my friends new $480 Pixel 3a XL today and it’s crazy how much phone you get for $500 and change after taxes. This is a brand new, midrange phone with pretty decent specs. The most important things from the more expensive 3 XL are there: stock android, rear camera and google support. It loses a front camera, some processor speed, lower resolution screen and a few other things. But it actually gains better battery life (bigger size) and a headphone jack. The 3a is even cheaper, and still solid.
If you have $500 to buy a phone, Apple has nothing for you except for a phone several years old and refurbished.
If they want to charge $1600 for the next Max, that’s ok with me. They are missing out on people who want midrange phones at affordable prices. $500 is as much as a lot of people will spend for a phone, and Apple has nothing new for them. If the se successor comes out, there’s no chance it’s $500. It’s hard to go into a store and pay $500 for a refurbished 7 or 8 when you see a phone like the Pixel 3a series.