To be honest,
@VesselA, nearly everything you have said is quite silly.
Buying stuff with no intention of using it for its intended purpose, but rather to exploit people by making a profit should be illegal.
So profiteering is exploitation? If you think that, then fair enough. But you're barking up the wrong tree if you're blaming the scalpers for profiteering, and not the businesses churning out the product (for profit).
retailers are registered businesses who buy the product wholesale from the supplier and put it out at a RRP, - recommended retail price - sometimes slightly below, sometimes slightly above, they are not exploiting the customer, but make profit from having bought in bulk wholesale.
Retailers are acceptable because they sell at the RRP? Even though they make profit?
But retailers have the advantage of being able to buy at low wholesale prices - a privilege not enjoyed by scalpers. Both retailers and scalpers benefit from a differential in their buy price and sell price: what makes the retailer superior?
dont be stupid - I explained the difference - a genuine retailer is not buying to exploit the consumer by charging outrageous prices like double the RRP. Also they are not removing purchase options from customers to increase the demand, they are increasing purchase options at the same price as the official apple site sells the products usually
There we go again - you seem to think that retailers are noble, altruistic givers. No. They're selling at RRP either because they have to (because Apple says so) or because they're too stupid to care about the profit they'd make from upping the price of a scarce product.
'Genuine retailers'
are buying to exploit customers. That's their bloody job! They use their market power - their unique selling and distribution network - to profit from the misallocation of resources. A retailer's job is to be a middle man. A retailer is no better than a scalper. That they charge RRP and a scalper charges more than RRP is irrelevant: a scalper is just a very good retailer. Retailers are scalpers at heart.
simply make a law banning and prosecuting anyone who isn't a registered retailer, and is buying up products in short supply and high demand, obviously with no intent to use them, but to sell them at extortionate rates above the RRP.
I'll ignore the 'simply', that's just too easy to jab at...
Do you know
why there are
registered sellers? They're not a good thing for you or I. They're not there to improve your life as a consumer. Restricting distribution to authorised resellers is done only to maximise profit.
Authorised resellers are exploitation in action. They're a mechanism by which corporations squeeze every last dollar from their distribution chain: resellers must commit to minimum orders, minimum retail space, advertising spots, and a host of other conditions. So when you said authorised retailers "increase purchase options" - that's simply not true; they want to do the opposite: have a small number of sellers, all paying for a piece of the pie. If every man and his dog could buy at wholesale prices and sell at the price he wanted, guess what, prices would be lower. The middle man would be eliminated.
Your argument is flawed.
You're championing retailers whilst lambasting the most successful type of retailer - the scalper.
You're praising authorised resellers when they exist only to keep prices high and competition low.
You preach about extortion and morals while supporting the removal of an individual's right to purchase what they want.
You despise people who most would describe as entrepreneurs.
Nonsense.