Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Like what? It's not all that different from how iPhone updates, which is a far more capable device.
There is a TON of room for improvement. Have you ever noticed it takes nearly an hour to update if you initiate from the watch app on the phone but only takes about 15mins if you initiate the update from the watch? It seems the update happens over Bluetooth if you start it from the phone and WiFi if you start it from the watch. Why the hell wouldn't it always use WiFi?

The process sucks as it is right now.
 
I think you are talking at cross-purposes.

The SpO2 feature is disabled in software for all Apple Watch 9 and Ultra 2s sold after the latest sales ban came into effect. They all have different serial numbers to differentiate them from models sold before the sales ban. Apple Watches sold before the latest sales ban will not have the SpO2 sensor disabled in software.

The hardware has not been changed in any way from what people can tell; the feature is simply disabled in software, which satisfied the ITC.

Exactly. Agree with everything you are saying here. The point I was bringing up was that it was discovered that Apple was using a change in the code to WatchOS to differentiate between pre-ban and post-ban Series 9s and Ultra 2s, and that all it will be taking to reenable the the sensor is to take out the IF or CASE statement that looks for the identifier and the statement that disables the sensor.

The issue I was bringing up was that this had the potential to affect previous models as well, because if a simple IF or CASE statement and looking for the identifier could disable it for one model, it could do the same for other models: legal requirements, or otherwise (notwithstanding the consequences of doing such a thing). That is what made checking the release of WatchOS 10.3 important.

What I'm wondering now is if those Series 9s and Ultra 2s sold post-ban already had 10.3 on them, or a newer build of 10.2, because there wouldn't have been a way to tell if they actually did have the sensor disabled without looking at the OS version on them.

Anyone saying that watches sold prior to the latest sales ban will have the SpO2 functionality disabled in software are spreading FUD.

No-one was saying that the watches sold prior to the latest ban had that functionality disabled. That is NOT what is being addressed here.

Those who buy a watch after the sales ban came into effect know that the watch no longer has SpO2 monitoring as that feature has been removed from the feature list. Anyone who bought an Apple Watch prior to the latest sales ban will continue to enjoy SpO2 monitoring.

Agreed. But what we didn't know until this past weekend was HOW that feature was going to be removed. Now that we know it is software, we now know the potential of what Apple could do to enable or disable a feature on any given watch:

Code:
if (identifier = xx) {
  disable feature();
  } else {
  enable feature();
  }

That could be done with ANY identifier. That isn't FUD, either; just the observation based on what was reported about how the O2 sensor feature was disabled in WatchOS.

BL.
 
Watch Ultra 2 user. Not updating over rumors, even if true, would cripple your ecosystem and risk all the security vulnerabilities.

I pretty much lock my phone down, and have been encouraging others to enable advanced messaging security.

I’m a sucker for gifs, which is holding me back on setting lockdown mode. I’m nobody special, but still.
 
Instead of big fixes (e.g. screen time requests) we get such incredible features like a countdown in the sunset/sunrise complication.
 
Further to my previous comment, has anyone here been successful in getting an S5 to run WatchOS 10 without horrible battery drain?
 
Further to my previous comment, has anyone here been successful in getting an S5 to run WatchOS 10 without horrible battery drain?

I am still using a series 5 and don’t think I have experienced any sort of severe battery drain with watchOS 10. At least battery life feels more or less the same compared with watchOS 9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knirirr
All the statements that Apple would disable SPO2 on S6/7/8 or S9 and Ultra 2 (sold before import ban went into effect) are FUD, nothing else.
And on those models with disabled SpO2 Apple will likely turn the feature on once this issue is settled, assuming it’s settled in Apples favor.

Take your logic and go. It has no place here!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jz0309
Looks like Apple Music also has this 24/12hr bug, and if you have return to clock enabled it shows 24hr clock instead of 12hr clock.
 
People need to report the 24 hours problem to Apple. It would be easy for them to miss it in the US.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.