I don’t think so. Amazon and Alphabet are usually the top 2.They do, but it’s easy to write a nonsense post here instead of doing some research on the internet.
Actually, Apple invests the most in R&D among all tech companies.
I don’t think so. Amazon and Alphabet are usually the top 2.They do, but it’s easy to write a nonsense post here instead of doing some research on the internet.
Actually, Apple invests the most in R&D among all tech companies.
How does this make any sense? No one would intentionally sell products at a lower than optimal price.I’m happy for the shareholders and all, but really, can’t they throw a bone to their customers for once and reduce that margin a bit? (lower product prices).
To each their own. I have cancelled my own Apple One subscription as well (keeping just my iCloud storage), but I don't expect it to have any material impact on Apple's finances, nor am I hoping that it will have.Don't know about that, we have cancelled all of our Apple services. The value versus the cost makes Apple services not worth it.
No, but some would say that the “optimal price” is the one that would maximize the combined happiness of employees and customers.How does this make any sense? No one would intentionally sell products at a lower than optimal price.
But the thing about a customer-facing market is that maximizing revenue implies maximizing happiness of customers. Apple products, with their current prices, have very high customer satisfaction levels and sales. Apple will only lower prices if customers think their products are overpriced, it seems very obvious to me.No, but some would say that the “optimal price” is the one that would maximize the combined happiness of employees and customers.
In the case of Amazon for 2022, their R&D spend surpasses Apple's by a wide margin.I don’t think so. Amazon and Alphabet are usually the top 2.
wow. Mac sales. just 8.2 percent. thats depressing.
No longer Apple computer. Apple iPhone and iPad company instead.
Dividends are tax inefficient compared to buybacks.Ugh. Wish they'd upped the dividend to $0.26. They used to be more friendly on yearly increases. Brutally conservative the past three years.
Wow, they have a 44.6% margin!
Buyback and dividend same thing. Tax consequences can be different.Ugh. Wish they'd upped the dividend to $0.26. They used to be more friendly on yearly increases. Brutally conservative the past three years.
Plot the gross margins and a very different story emerges.What a lovely, misleading graph showing so far back. What I'm seeing here is from Q1 2021 Apple has had very little growth.
Not a very accurate portrayal. There is an inference in your statement that it is a fraudulaent or shady practice or is an insider move. It is none of those things. Every buyback ever announced by Apple has been completed.They have used higher buybacks announcement to pump stock price.
To accurately represent the past.Is there any point in including iPod sales in the graph anymore?
Why didn't they show that then!? If it makes them look good it'd make sense to spin it that way.Plot the gross margins and a very different story emerges.
It's a good question, but not one that was ever going to get a material answer. Tim tipped his hat several times toward next week's presentation. If there is not significant meat announced toward their AI ambitions at that point, then I think it would be more reasonable to declare the emperor has no clothes. At this point, it's hard not to give Apple at least some benefit of the doubt (even if I, personally, think Apple's AI ambitions will be lacking in some material way, as is usually the case with Apple and cutting edge technology)
Because it doesn’t make them look so good - it shows they are squeezing more profit from sales.Why didn't they show that then!? If it makes them look good it'd make sense to spin it that way.