This. And what about the chickens lives who will be affected by the cows painting billboards with the words "eat mor chiken?"As a former Michigan farm boy, I’m appalled by Apple’s decision. The cattle overpopulation problem, already pushing cow containment to the limit, will balloon. How many of those hooved beasts formerly destined for fine apparel will instead go on to breed? And where does it stop? No more leather belts? Leather thongs? Millions of cows will become billions, then trillions. They’ll be coming for our food, our jobs, our homes, and finally, when all other food sources are exhausted, they will come for us and our families. To us, it’s the ultimate horror. To them, it‘s merely poetic justice.
How many innocent human lives will Apple sacrifice on the blood-soaked alter of bovine preservation?
If you naively believe that Apple is doing it out of love for nature and environment I pity you. Higher profit margins with substitutes.
Yeah part of me thinks FineWoven might have been better received if it was an addition not an outright replacement. If they're so insistent on getting rid of leather, then do it...but maybe not in the same year. If they didn't do both at the same time, the reception might've been different.Goodbye leather is fine, when the replacement is superior. FineWoven is not.
No chance Apple ships iPhone 16 cases in "FineWoven". It'll quietly disappear. Or be a silicone-only year.
you realize that no one skins a cow for the skin, right? hides are a byproduct of the animal and 99% of every cow is used in a myriad of industries.I have the Finewoven case for my 15 Pro Max; when I first bought it, I saturated it with Scotchgard, which turned out to be a truly good idea. Mine looked quite a bit like Ms. Stern's in the photo, and I washed it with Dawn and warm water; it seriously looked new again afterward - even the scratches disappeared.
That being said, I agree with you - they are crap. I should not have to worry with Scotchgarding and washing my freaking phone case.
But there is no need to include PETA in your screed; I've been a member for decades. If you are OK with using the peeled-off, dried flesh of animals who were mistreated and kept in horrible conditions to protect your phone - that's fine, and I sincerely respect your right to do so. But don't criticize those of us who are grossed out by it.
Yeah part of me thinks FineWoven might have been better received if it was an addition not an outright replacement.
Exactly. And I'm not saying they would have had to keep leather forever. They could have released FineWoven last year alongside the leather and then could have gotten rid of leather, say, this year with the introduction of the 16. Having a gap between introduction of a new material and the discontinuation of another will probably still be perceived as it being a replacement, but instead of anger and pitchforks, you might have "ok, whatever" instead 😂 Another thing that didn't help with the "replacement for leather" aspect...is the price. My experience with FineWoven, I would say the cost should NOT be the same as the leather was.Yes a very good point! It would have been interesting to compare sales data. Even if leather outsold finewoven, Apple could have claimed that it reduced leather usage by N%.
A related problem is that natural products are typically better than artificial products and Apple’s user base are among those who prefer natural when it comes to food and materials. Even Apple favors metals over plastic for its products. Finewoven is not a natural material.