Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The optimal Mac lineup, MacBook or desktop fits the Steve grid - one consumer option (plastic, cheaper), and one pro option (higher performance and premium materials). People either want cheap and functional or performance and damn the expense.

Same is true for iPads, and for iPhones.

Can offer with different screen sizes and customised upgrade options, but no need to overly expand and complicate the core lineup.
Remember when Steve updated the Steve grid to include the Mac Mini and MacBook Air.
 
Last edited:
I fail to see how those specs are low enough to hit lower price points, or to avoid taking away sales from the higher priced MacBookAir line.
We're only talking a couple hundred bucks difference in price point aren't we between this lower priced MacBook and the MBA? By the time it launches the M1 chip will be 4-5 years old and just like the iPhone SE recycled the older/surplus chips of earlier iPhones I'd expect the new MacBook to do the same for older M-chips.

Add a high quality plastic body (cheaper than machined aluminium), a lower quality LCD (somehow marketed as 'Retina' regardless) and I don't think it's far off the lower price point.

I do think the MBA becomes a little less relevant though. For what I use my current M2 MBA for I expect I'll be able to do all of it on a lower cost MacBook just fine.
 
This Lenovo Yoga Book was slick, very light and very thin. It felt quite premium and solid because of precise very sturdy metal hinges (they looked unbreakable). It felt positively different to hold it in your hands from the normal laptops. When closed it felt like one unbreakable very solid compact metal piece. And I think it was not too much expensive for what it . Ports: micro USB, mini HDMI, audio jack, micro SSD and some versions with LTE sim slot. Anyway I wish that Apple could get inspiration from that.
 

Attachments

  • hinges.jpeg
    hinges.jpeg
    4.2 KB · Views: 39
  • lenovo-yoga-book.jpeg
    lenovo-yoga-book.jpeg
    92.8 KB · Views: 50
  • yogabook.jpeg
    yogabook.jpeg
    259.1 KB · Views: 46
  • Like
Reactions: bumblebritches5
We're only talking a couple hundred bucks difference in price point aren't we between this lower priced MacBook and the MBA? By the time it launches the M1 chip will be 4-5 years old and just like the iPhone SE recycled the older/surplus chips of earlier iPhones I'd expect the new MacBook to do the same for older M-chips.
Generally the SE products don't use old CPUs though. The iPhone SEs are almost always old chassis, old cameras, old screens, but recent or current SoCs.

The current A* lineup is almost as fast as the M1, plus has newer architecture, plus runs at lower power.

I just don't see the argument for "just give us old M1s in a cheap laptop"... that is what they're doing selling the old M1 MacBook Air already.

Time will tell.
 
Will be first in-line if this is real to replace a personal 2017 MacBook Intel m3. Apple Silicon gives it a better shelf life even if no fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheNewLou
That's not the one he's showing. You're talking about the first plastic Macbooks that came in white and black. What he showed is the unibody plastic Macbook... it was built totally differently and was much more durable.
Ahh, right. Sorry, it's been quite a while. Between the iBook and the various MacBooks, there was quite a parade of white plastic laptops coming from Apple before they finally settled into the unbody aluminum style.

Off topic, but I remember people being really pissy when they dropped the name "PowerBook" :rolleyes: The stuff people get worked up over! Things really don't change.
 
The optimal Mac lineup, MacBook or desktop fits the Steve grid - one consumer option (plastic, cheaper), and one pro option (higher performance and premium materials). People either want cheap and functional or performance and damn the expense.
It will forever frustrate me that somehow Steve Jobs sold "simplified product matrix" as something is good for customers, when it was primarily done to save Apple money, reduce customer choice, and funnel customers into successful products.

A simple small product matrix results in less customer choice.

It is good for Apple, but it isn't necessarily good for us.

I will gladly accept a more complicated product line of various price points than Apple only offering a few profitable SKUs with limited user choice.

The simple product grid was marketing, nothing more.
 
I don’t know why anyone would downvote this, this is exactly what Google does.
Because Google sells data, they need people to use their services, not their hardware. So they don't care that people who had a chromebook as kids will never go near another one ever, if they keep using gmail and google search. But right now Apple is still in the selling hardware business, they can't destroy their brand with useless junk like that. Another factor is that while google buys the cpus, Apple makes them, which means there's a negligable cost difference between an a16 and an m2. Their marginal cost is only the cost of the extra silicon and what tsmc charges. Going anywhere under 8GB ram or 256GB ssd is also a minimal cost saving. Where they can save big is the body and the display.
 
We’ll see. The PC market is doing better today because they managed to claw back a sense of premium computers. There was a long time there where PCs were all cheap plastic and people thought $500 was outrageously expensive for a computer and everything was junk. The MacBook Air and Intel’s attempt to replicate in the “Ultrabook” helped reverse the trend.

I’m just afraid Apple is going to sacrifice quality and it’s going to hurt everyone.
Attempt to replicate? Please point me towards the sub-1kg Apple notebooks.
 
The optimal Mac lineup, MacBook or desktop fits the Steve grid - one consumer option (plastic, cheaper), and one pro option (higher performance and premium materials). People either want cheap and functional or performance and damn the expense.

Same is true for iPads, and for iPhones.

Can offer with different screen sizes and customised upgrade options, but no need to overly expand and complicate the core lineup.
Disagree. Apple is much, much larger now than when that grid was introduced and can now offer customers 3 tiers of products, instead of just 2 now.
 
Bring back the white plastic laptops, you cowards!!!
Remember the iPhone 5C?

Yeah, nobody does. Because it didn’t sell. Plastic is over. Done with.

Is the Apple Watch SE plastic? No

Is the iPhone SE plastic? No

Why would a MacBook SE be plastic?

The big cost is larger screens, larger batteries, which is why prices go up as Apple pushes bigger phones & laptops.

Using previous generation designs keeps costs very low; just stick a modern underclocked (or fewer cores) 3nm M3 in a 13” MacBook Air and you’ve got a $749 device with good $$ margins.

Maybe a new M3 Lite cpu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumblebritches5
nearly everyone i went to school with had those black and white macbooks, seems like a weird product to not have any true successor, but this could really take off. it'll be interesting to see what kind of compromises it makes over the air/pro, but a 12" or smaller is really missing from the lineup right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumblebritches5
Base name = low end
* Air = mid range
* Pro = high end

iPad, iPad Air, iPad Pro
(Let’s ignore the mini for now haha)

MacBook, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro
That's definitely one way Apple can do it. I'd recommend the following;

iPad SE, iPad, iPad Pro
MB SE, MB, MBP
iPhone SE, iPhone, iPhone Pro
AirPods SE, AirPods, AirPods Pro

It would provide consistency in their branding across their major product lines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottrichardson
Big, if true. In the past, Apple has used the talking point of avoiding this approach because it creates a race to the bottom.

If that was true they wouldn't have made the iPhone SE or the Mac Mini. They say a lot of things that are all excuses for them to make the decisions they do, but the fact of the matter is they'll follow the path that makes them more money, which in this case because of inflation is more affordable Macs, especially since a low cost Macbook has been the #1 request for everyone for years.
 
The optimal Mac lineup, MacBook or desktop fits the Steve grid - one consumer option (plastic, cheaper), and one pro option (higher performance and premium materials). People either want cheap and functional or performance and damn the expense.

Same is true for iPads, and for iPhones.

Can offer with different screen sizes and customised upgrade options, but no need to overly expand and complicate the core lineup.
One could argue in favor of a 3x2 grid, especially since Apple itself pretty quickly moved in that direction after introducing the Mac mini.
 
At the school I went to years ago they had a fleet of 11.6” chromebooks. The size was miniature, they were slow, and the trackpads were horrendous.

MacBooks are clearly in a class of their own. My 4th one (M1 Air) is so much nicer than a Chromebook. Since Steve Jobs said “We can’t ship junk”, these less expensive MacBooks still may not be able to compete in the education market. But, it could be successful outside that market. For example,, people who want a travel-size computer or something that they can afford.
A 12" MB with A17 Pro, 8GB RAM, 128GB SSD shouldn't have an issue starting at $599 / $699
 
If i could buy an 11 or 12-inch MacBook, I would sell my iPad and current MacBook in a minute. Ironically that's most likely the reason I can't buy an 11 or 12-inch Macbook.
 
nearly everyone i went to school with had those black and white macbooks, seems like a weird product to not have any true successor, but this could really take off. it'll be interesting to see what kind of compromises it makes over the air/pro, but a 12" or smaller is really missing from the lineup right now

This right here. There was a time when the 12” MacBook was basically ubiquitous. I think bringing a product in this class back into the lineup is good. Apple’s base prices have shot upward over the last decade. Entry level hardware is important to offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumblebritches5
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.