Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

HopefulHumanist

macrumors 6502a
Jan 28, 2015
760
574
I saw that same band and wanted to do the same thing but was worried it wouldn't look good on the leather band adapter rods. I really don't think in my opinion that it looks good. Not to mention a 42 mm SS with Classic is $700 plus $80 for the setup you have is $780 vs $1,000 for the Apple Link. Not enough savings to warrant it when it doesn't look that good to me. But I'm glad someone else did it as I would have wanted to and I don't think it does.

Right. The true comparison is $449 vs $229 [$149 + $80]. It's all subjective but I don't think the $220 is a worthwhile tradeoff for something you'll wear every day for at least 1-2 years.
 

InAustralia

macrumors 6502
Oct 7, 2013
313
114
Sydney, Australia

damant

macrumors 6502
Feb 14, 2010
295
22
Very nice.
Looks great.
Thanks for th pics.

Way better looking and more masculine than Apple link band.
Apple links band looks a bit thin and not meaty enough ( comparing to a tag f1).. So glad I tried it out in person and not liking it.

I'm planning to get one of these http://www.strapcode.com/store/23mm-metal-band-c-164.html?infoBox=3
I'm wondering if Click's type of adapters might look better ?.

Have fun.
 
Last edited:

clint-bell

macrumors regular
Apr 23, 2015
112
16
Thanks for posting. It does look really good and for a fraction of the price! Even though the strap isn't the cheapest it's still better than these cheap china straps which sell for under a tenner but feel like hollow tin!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.