I have a 1973 Stainless Oyster Perpetual Date that I wore for years and replaced the crystal probably 3 times. They're *way* easier to scratch than the Stainless Apple Watch.I think we need to see some YouTubers test it all the same. Make sure Rolex isn’t fooling anymore.
Not true, Apple's Sapphire is not the same.Apple is using the same sapphire CRYSTAL as everyone else in the watch industry. There's no fooling going on. They choose a hardness level for the final product that they feel is the best balance between cracking and scratching.
Watching a guy on youtube scratch stuff with a Moh's hardness test kit and coming to the conclusion that someone is trying to fool everyone is absolutely ridiculous. Nobody is putting actual sapphire in a watch screen.
thanks for clearing that up.Not true, Apple's Sapphire is not the same.
Does sapphire form naturally in the wild. I thought all current sapphire was made in a lab. I thought all glass in use was made in a lab.Seems like some degree of trolling here. It isn’t “fake sapphire”, it’s lab created sapphire. It’s identical to natural sapphire with zero impurities, so actually stronger. How exactly is Apple “fooling” anyone? They’ve never claimed that they are mining sapphire to use on their products. Do us all a favor and find something worthwhile to channel all this rage into.
Yes. Madagascar is currently the world leader in sapphire mining. It forms in igneous and metamorphic rock. The sapphire used in manufacture is lab made. Natural sapphire is a precious gemstone only slightly less valuable than diamond.Does sapphire form naturally in the wild. I thought all current sapphire was made in a lab. I thought all glass in use was made in a lab.
Apple is using the same sapphire CRYSTAL as everyone else in the watch industry. There's no fooling going on. They choose a hardness level for the final product that they feel is the best balance between cracking and scratching.
Watching a guy on youtube scratch stuff with a Moh's hardness test kit and coming to the conclusion that someone is trying to fool everyone is absolutely ridiculous. Nobody is putting actual sapphire in a watch screen.
I’d like to see a desk jockey YouTuber use these tools on an Apple Watch and then immediately after a £10k Rolex to compare results.
Did you even take the time to scrutinize the statement?thanks for clearing that up.
One guy used a mallet on the Ultra and broke the wood table before the watch screen gave waySomeone here said they dropped their Ultra on tile and cracked the ceramic backing.
Someone else on YouTube subjected the Ultra's Sapphire front to extreme abuse and could barely scratch it.
So, there's that.
Exactly this.The Sapphire screen is ultra durable.
You mean 'fake sapphire' like those in a $100k Rolex? LMAOI want an Ultra with Ceramic Shield, not fake Sapphire.
I have a 1973 Stainless Oyster Perpetual Date that I wore for years and replaced the crystal probably 3 times. They're *way* easier to scratch than the Stainless Apple Watch.