Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Meister

Suspended
Oct 10, 2013
5,456
4,310
I wasn't aware that you got to decide what was groundbreaking or not. For me touch ID is just as important as anything you mentioned there. I couldn't care less if it's considered groundbreaking or not.
That :apple: put Wifi and bluetooth in their iPads was important, too but I wouldn't call that an innovation either.
Touch ID was nothing new and didn't change the way people use their devices.
At least the mouse and multi-touch certainly did.
 

orestes1984

macrumors 65816
Jun 10, 2005
1,000
4
Australia
Not long after that post, I listened to the whole thing. Not my undivided attention, but enough to thoroughly enjoy the video.

This morning I stumbled across Steve Wozniak says 'there were a lot of things wrong' with 'Jobs' movie | The Verge (2013-08-17).

To anyone who read that brief article in The Verge: please take time to also watch the fifteen-minute video on YouTube.

(The 'feel' of what's in the video is lacking from the written article, and that's not only due to brevity. I suspect that there's a mis-quote, and so on.)

Postscript

Around 05:02 on the timeline http://youtu.be/v6ciNXc_4OQ?t=5m2s "… (Jeff Raskin) was treated, like, so shabbily in the movie. No. I didn't like seeing a lot of people I know not get the respect that they deserved …"

If Steve Wozniak was still at Apple, Apple would be bankrupt. Steve Wozniak doesn't get how to sell computers, is to much of a technogeek, and in the end an idealist.

Woz today if he was in any way connected to Apple would bankrupt the company and he'd be even worse than the Pepsi guy. We're talking about a guy who believes in sunshine and rainbows and giving away things for free.

The only reason Woz was there in the first place is because Jobs needed someone who could build the Apple product.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
The only reason Woz was there in the first place is because Jobs needed someone who could build the Apple product.
Woz invented the apple products it was a collaborative effort and most of the engineering was done by Woz.It was his ideas and genius that led to the apple 1. It was Steve's genius that led to the Apple 2 where he sold a computer that was not in kit form.

Don't diminish the overall impact that the Woz had on Apple. If there was no Woz, there would be no Apple.
 
Last edited:

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Nov 14, 2011
24,724
32,184
I'm just saying, if they brought Wozniak back to Apple, Apple would be bankrupt pretty much within a few years.

In the past Woz has said Apple should make an Android phone.

http://www.wired.com/2014/02/woz-interview/
There’s nothing that would keep Apple out of the Android market as a secondary phone market,” said Wozniak–who, it should be noted, is no longer involved in the day-to-day workings of the company. “We could compete very well. People like the precious looks of stylings and manufacturing that we do in our product compared to the other Android offerings. We could play in two arenas at the same time.”

He also said Apple should partner with Chinese manufacturers to make a cheap iPhone for China.

http://www.businessinsider.com/woz-a-cheap-iphone-could-be-unhealthy-2013-8
He also suggested the "almost treasonous" idea of partnering with a Chinese manufacturer to build a "totally different" smartphone than the iPhone and allowing it be sold as under the Apple brand, with Apple "inspecting it to make sure it's a quality product."

Thank god he's not making any decisions at Apple.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I'm just saying, if they brought Wozniak back to Apple, Apple would be bankrupt pretty much within a few years.

It depends on the role he would take. I think everyone would agree, he would make a poor CEO, but in some sort of product development role, he would be a great asset. As an ambassador to increase the visibility of the Apple brand, he would be great. As with everyone, we have our own set of strengths and weaknesses. Woz could be a great addition to apple in the right position.
 

Ulenspiegel

macrumors 68040
Nov 8, 2014
3,212
2,491
Land of Flanders and Elsewhere
Woz invented the apple products it was a collaborative effort and most of the engineering was done by Woz.It was his ideas and genius that led to the apple 1. It was Steve's genius that led to the Apple 2 where he sold a computer that was not in kit form.

Don't diminish the overall impact that the Woz had on Apple. If there was no Woz, there would be no Apple.

It depends on the role he would take. I think everyone would agree, he would make a poor CEO, but in some sort of product development role, he would be a great asset. As an ambassador to increase the visibility of the Apple brand, he would be great. As with everyone, we have our own set of strengths and weaknesses. Woz could be a great addition to apple in the right position.

Agrees on both counts. He is a good and talented person, but not a businessman.
 

grahamperrin

macrumors 601
Jun 8, 2007
4,942
648
Back on topic: discovering the culture(s) of Apple

… As with everyone, we have our own set of strengths and weaknesses. Woz could be a great addition to apple in the right position.

+1

https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=20410202#post20410202 reminds me that I somehow managed to take things way off-topic from the culture of Apple. I think my key point there was this notion:
  • a collection of snippets of information, from individuals, can't paint as realistic a picture as a single substantial contribution from one well-informed, well-connected individual.
So, for example, I'd pay special attention to a Steve Wozniak description of cultures at Apple during his time there, provided that description is not rushed. Not exclusive attention, but someone like him would have had a broad overview of things at certain levels.

For Apple in more recent years (let's say, post-Steve Jobs): I can't imagine who would both (a) have that breadth of knowledge of cultures at any level within the company and (b) be willing (or permitted) to speak about those cultures.

I just stumbled across a 2013 question, Any discussion on lack of secrecy? – I'll probably add something there.
 

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Nov 14, 2011
24,724
32,184
It depends on the role he would take. I think everyone would agree, he would make a poor CEO, but in some sort of product development role, he would be a great asset. As an ambassador to increase the visibility of the Apple brand, he would be great. As with everyone, we have our own set of strengths and weaknesses. Woz could be a great addition to apple in the right position.

Product development role? Like one that would advocate Apple designing and selling an Android phone? No thanks.
 

lowendlinux

macrumors 603
Sep 24, 2014
5,460
6,788
Germany
It depends on the role he would take. I think everyone would agree, he would make a poor CEO, but in some sort of product development role, he would be a great asset. As an ambassador to increase the visibility of the Apple brand, he would be great. As with everyone, we have our own set of strengths and weaknesses. Woz could be a great addition to apple in the right position.

I agree he'd make a great brand ambassador
 

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Nov 14, 2011
24,724
32,184
That's your opinion, to which I don't prescribe too. I think he has a lot to offer and could help apple even further.

We'll have to agree to disagree then as I don't think what he would offer is what Apple needs. :) If Tim Cook thought Woz would be of benefit to Apple I'm sure he would have called on his services by now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.