Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am sure it sounds nice (never heard in person), but how would it be HiFi if the high end of frequency curve only extends to 16KHz?
 
In case anyone cares, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, $349 in February 2006 is worth $541.71 in January 2024 (the most recent month available).

Which is less than a JBL Boombox 3 wifi now:


I just got one. Sure, it has more features, you’d sort of expect that 18 years later, but it doesn’t sound all that much better, if at all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zapmymac


Reflecting on the iPod Hi-Fi, launched 18 years ago, many long-time readers may remember it as Apple's ambitious foray into the home audio market, long before smart speakers were a thing.

ipod-hi-fi.jpg

Priced at $349, it promised audiophile-quality sound within a compact design, offering home audio without the clutter of traditional stereo components. It featured a built-in Universal Dock for iPods, providing a seamless integration that allowed users to charge their device while playing music.

With its capability to produce a wide frequency range and room-filling sound without distortion, the iPod Hi-Fi combined Jony Ive's minimalist design aesthetic and high-quality audio performance. Its versatility was further highlighted by the inclusion of an Apple Remote, and the option for AC or battery power, making it portable.

Many products in the iPod series achieved remarkable success, but the iPod Hi-Fi wasn't one of them. The device was praised for its big rich sound, bass response, and ease of use, but its high price was a turn-off for many Apple device users. Also, the connector prominently positioned atop the speaker unit exposed docked iPods to potential knocks and damage.

Despite its innovative features, the iPod Hi-Fi remained a niche product in Apple's lineup, and the combination iPod dock/speaker system never took off. Apple discontinued it on September 5, 2007, just 554 days after its launch.

Article Link: Apple's iPod Hi-Fi Launched 18 Years Ago – and Lasted Just 554 Days
This thing sounded GREAT. I was working at an Apple Store when it was released and we used it exclusively during our overnight activities, of which there were many back then.
 
Are you privy to the sales figures of HomePods? Got a direct line to uncle Timmy there?
Apple didn't stop publishing the figures because they were so good. It's a strong indication (along with every other indication) that they're in fact quite poor.

We did learn that a sizable portion of them were sold to you. How much does a Pippin or the iPod Hifi go for these days? I feel like you've got a future equivalent product on your hands. Several, in fact.
 
It is nice to hear people still using, and apparently loving, their iPod Hifi 🥳🤩

That S/PDIF connector is a life-extender for this machine and other powered speakers!

Shoutout for those mentioning the AirPort Express and it's great versatility 🥰
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aggamemnon
I still have 4 of these around the house connected to AirPort Express WiFi via optical lossless digital audio over AirPlay.

The sound quality still far exceeds that available from any other Apple product.
This is the way! Glad to hear people using their tech that they paid for. Just because something didn't sell well (generally speaking) does not mean it is useless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChromeAce
Does anyone have a hi-fi and a large homepod to compare how they sound? It would be interesting to see what progress has been made :)
 
It is nice to hear people still using, and apparently loving, their iPod Hifi 🥳🤩

That S/PDIF connector is a life-extender for this machine and other powered speakers!

Shoutout for those mentioning the AirPort Express and it's great versatility 🥰
My parents still use this exact setup today.
 
  • Love
Reactions: zapmymac
Except HomePod had a mediocre audio quality for its price.

I disagree. Compared to hi-fi separates that you need to pair to the right amp and have the right source yes. Compared to active studio monitors (which is my preferred way of listening) yes. But compared to other products in the same market segment (Bose, Sonos etc) it blows them out of the water as they're truly terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zapmymac
If the high price was indeed a turn-off, Apple seems to have forgotten that lesson with the HomePod.
Indeed it was. Around the same time JBL made a similar product that was smaller and easier to carry, but more importantly the iPod didn't sit loosely on top but got locked into the unit so you could carry it around.
the AASP I worked at sold lots of JBL systems and zero Hi-Fis. JBL was like $100 and granted it didn't sound _as_ good as the Hi-Fi but the price and functionality were much better than H-Fi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jarman74
Audiophile? It sounded like a cheap boombox with emphasis on the BOOM. Zero detail from any instrument or vocal, just muffled noise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoBytes
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.