Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Seeing Red memory pressure during normal tasks is by definition an indication that you need more RAM. That's literally the point of it. Apple even calls this out in their own support documentation...

  • Green memory pressure: Your computer is using all of its RAM efficiently.
  • Yellow memory pressure: Your computer might eventually need more RAM.
  • Red memory pressure: Your computer needs more RAM.

Source:
No it’s not a simple binary decision. As I have proven on something that should only take 2GB of RAM was eating up all 192GB and causing insane swap (literally hundreds of GBs for the test).

I have faced many other issues with other apps too. Yes even browser tabs. I created a website that had memory leaks too.

That is why I talk to my clients for a good amount of time. Maybe they have seen something similar and the don’t need to waste money on more RAM if they can try an alternative app to see if it’s a bug or not. I don’t simply say “you see red memory pressure? Sorry get a new computer/more RAM.” I don’t agree with Apple’s docs here. It’s much more conversational approach. If I followed Apple’s documentation I wouldn’t be able to get a computer with more RAM. And the task doesn’t make sense. No 1080p video editing work needs more than 192GB.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: HVDynamo

dgdosen

macrumors 68030
Dec 13, 2003
2,765
1,407
Seattle
If the customer can buy it then Apple sells it. And Apple sells all Macs (every Mac) with 16gb if you want 16gb of RAM.
Quit straw-manning.

This thread is helping to point out that Apple is selling many multi-tasking computers with the same amount of memory as a single-tasking phone. That's pretty much the point of the post starting this chain.
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
No it’s not a simple binary decision. As I have proven on something that should only take 2GB of RAM was eating up all 192GB and causing insane swap (literally hundreds of GBs for the test).

I have faced many other issues with other apps too. Yes even browser tabs. I created a website that had memory leaks too.

That is why I talk to my clients for a good amount of time. Maybe they have seen something similar and the don’t need to waste money on more RAM if they can try an alternative app to see if it’s a bug or not. I don’t simply say “you see red memory pressure? Sorry get a new computer/more RAM.” I don’t agree with Apple’s docs here. It’s much more conversational approach. If I followed Apple’s documentation I wouldn’t be able to get a computer with more RAM. And the task doesn’t make sense. No 1080p video editing work needs more than 192GB.
Yeah "computer needs more RAM" not the same thing as you need a new computer with more RAM.
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
Quit straw-manning.

This thread is helping to point out that Apple is selling many multi-tasking computers with the same amount of memory as a single-tasking phone. That's pretty much the point of the post starting this chain.
NOt a strawman.

They sell Macs with more RAM. What's the issue? YOu don't like that other people are buying Macs with less RAM than you need?

YOu don't like that people are buying Macs with as much RAM as an Iphone becasue you need more than 8gb of RAM?

Are you trying to save everybody from themselves? Is everybody's computer going to blow up and go into the trash next year because they bought 8gb?

I think your argument entirely boils down to complaining about the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Yeah "computer needs more RAM" not the same thing as you need a new computer with more RAM.
Yes it is with Apple Silicon. That is why I listed both if you have an old Intel iMac or Intel Mac Pro where you can upgrade the RAM.
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
Yes it is with Apple Silicon. That is why I listed both if you have an old Intel iMac or Intel Mac Pro where you can upgrade the RAM.
"computer needs more RAM" can mean close some windows/apps. And that isn't necessarily a showstopper at all.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
"computer needs more RAM" can mean close some windows/apps. And that isn't necessarily a showstopper at all.
People interpret the Apple docs to install more memory. Not close apps to give more free RAM.

Computer needs more RAM implies this.

Application needs more RAM can imply what you are stating.
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
I don't grok what's wrong about complaining about the price, especially the BTO prices for parts that aren't even Apple's ;)
nothing wrong with it per se ... I'm guilty myself. Just some people seem to lose track of what they are actually complaining about.

Nevermind some don't have a good grasp of the futility of it given Apple has been doing this for 20+ years while Mac share market share has increased from ~3% to ~16% over that timespan (at least in the US.) ;)
 
Last edited:

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
People interpret the Apple docs to install more memory. Not close apps to give more free RAM.

Computer needs more RAM implies this.

Application needs more RAM can imply what you are stating.
"If memory pressure is yellow, red, or has spikes, check to see if an app is using up memory and causing the memory pressure to increase. If you no longer need to have the app running, you should quit the app."
 

dandeco

macrumors 65816
Dec 5, 2008
1,197
1,005
Brockton, MA
The only real boost was going from 4 GB to 8 GB in the late 2010s, so yeah, I've noticed that pattern as well.
When looking for a later-generation Intel-based Mac laptop to use at my workplace after my 2015 Retina 15" MacBook Pro wouldn't run the latest versions of Slack and Apple Configurator, I wanted something that had 16 GB of RAM, due to all the multitasking I do, and generally at that time, only the 15" MacBook Pros came with that as standard. But early this month I lucked out and managed to find a 2018 Retina 13" MacBook Air that came with 16 GB of RAM AND a 512 GB SSD to boot!
965C9503-8ADF-4747-BE52-928424FA612B_1_201_a.jpeg

I was able to wipe and "restore" the Air's SSD by hooking it up to my M1 MacBook Air via Thunderbolt 3 and using Apple Configurator to do the task. I attempted a Mac OS install via Internet Recovery, and it was SLOW because the built-in battery was practically dead, but once I got it installed and I could get into the System Information, I was pleased to see it was configured with 16 GB of RAM! Then among replacing the battery, I succeeded in getting it operating like it's supposed to, and while it's not as fast as my M1 Air (also with 16 GB of RAM) or even the 2015 Retina Pro I used before it, for work purposes it's completely adequate.
This was the first MacBook Air to actually have a 16 GB RAM configuration! Especially now that the Air was Apple's entry-level laptop for consumers and education markets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ric22

dgdosen

macrumors 68030
Dec 13, 2003
2,765
1,407
Seattle
NOt a strawman.

They sell Macs with more RAM. What's the issue? YOu don't like that other people are buying Macs with less RAM than you need?

YOu don't like that people are buying Macs with as much RAM as an Iphone becasue you need more than 8gb of RAM?

Are you trying to save everybody from themselves? Is everybody's computer going to blow up and go into the trash next year because they bought 8gb?

I think your argument entirely boils down to complaining about the price.
I freely admit I complain about Apple pricing - especially upgrade pricing - as do many others. I still buy them because they have (good) value to me.

I think Apple's focus on generating profit via non-upgradeable ram and storage is lazy. If they set their minds to it, I'm sure they could find other ways to boost HW profits. For example - maybe setting higher 'early adopter' pricing for their new products - or even allowing customers to 'bid' on pre-release models to extract that additional profit out of those willing to pay a nice premium. Many Apple customers are willing and able to pay higher prices. Apple needs to find a better way to extract that value, while still holding onto those unwilling to pay a higher price.

At any rate, getting back to the subject of this thread, which you keep trying to change - My argument, boils down to Apple's hypocrisy on the matter. They're saying (and you are fiercely defending) it's fine to sell a multi-tasking computer - even a "Pro" computer with the same amount of memory as a single-tasking phone.

My indignation arises from my feeling that these devices will end up in a landfill well earlier than they should because they become too limited over time.
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2008
2,961
1,515
I freely admit I complain about Apple pricing - especially upgrade pricing - as do many others. I still buy them because they have (good) value to me.

I think Apple's focus on generating profit via non-upgradeable ram and storage is lazy. If they set their minds to it, I'm sure they could find other ways to boost HW profits. For example - maybe setting higher 'early adopter' pricing for their new products - or even allowing customers to 'bid' on pre-release models to extract that additional profit out of those willing to pay a nice premium. Many Apple customers are willing and able to pay higher prices. Apple needs to find a better way to extract that value, while still holding onto those unwilling to pay a higher price.

At any rate, getting back to the subject of this thread, which you keep trying to change - My argument, boils down to Apple's hypocrisy on the matter. They're saying (and you are fiercely defending) it's fine to sell a multi-tasking computer - even a "Pro" computer with the same amount of memory as a single-tasking phone.

My indignation arises from my feeling that these devices will end up in a landfill well earlier than they should because they become too limited over time.
So people shouldn't be allowed to buy a Mac with 8gb RAM nor should Apple be allowed to sell them one because you have deemed no Mac can be sold with the same amount of RAM as a phone?

The customers don't get a say in this nor the companies? Just you?

Do I have to pretend like my M1 8gb Mini doesn't work perfectly for my needs? Do the millions who bought 8gb MBAs the past few years have to pretend the same?
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: ric22 and Chuckeee

HVDynamo

macrumors 6502a
Feb 21, 2011
712
1,089
Minnesota
No it’s not a simple binary decision. As I have proven on something that should only take 2GB of RAM was eating up all 192GB and causing insane swap (literally hundreds of GBs for the test).

I have faced many other issues with other apps too. Yes even browser tabs. I created a website that had memory leaks too.

That is why I talk to my clients for a good amount of time. Maybe they have seen something similar and the don’t need to waste money on more RAM if they can try an alternative app to see if it’s a bug or not. I don’t simply say “you see red memory pressure? Sorry get a new computer/more RAM.” I don’t agree with Apple’s docs here. It’s much more conversational approach. If I followed Apple’s documentation I wouldn’t be able to get a computer with more RAM. And the task doesn’t make sense. No 1080p video editing work needs more than 192GB.
Again, bugs are a completely other story. If you have a bad memory leak that is an issue that needs to be fixed. That's a straw-man argument, FYI. This discussion is around general RAM required for operating day to day with functional software. 8GB is pathetic on any new machine at the price point Apple charges. Sure, I have an 8GB RasberryPi that is great with 8GB and even 4GB, but it's a small embedded computer not meant to do much at the end of the day and costs less than $100. Come to think of it, it has 8GB RAM and costs less than $100 for the whole thing. For what Apple is charging, it should start at 16GB for even the base model. If you are consistently seeing red memory pressure on your system (and the software you are working with isn't bugged), You need more RAM. Period.

Just a note, the RaspberryPi 5 uses LPDDR4X-4267 SDRAM, which happens to be the same as the memory used with the M1. The newer Macs and all Pro versions use LPDDR5X, which does probably cost a couple dollars more, sure.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlumaMac and ric22

ProbablyDylan

macrumors regular
Mar 26, 2024
213
258
Los Angeles
So people shouldn't be allowed to buy a Mac with 8gb RAM nor should Apple be allowed to sell them one because you have deemed no Mac can be sold with the same amount of RAM as a phone?

The customers don't get a say in this nor the companies? Just you?

Do I have to pretend like my M1 8gb Mini doesn't work perfectly for my needs? Do the millions who bought 8gb MBAs the past few years have to pretend the same?

I can only assume that the argument these people are failing to make is that the base models (8/256) should be priced lower. I feel that this is entirely fair.
 

Abazigal

Contributor
Jul 18, 2011
19,684
22,225
Singapore
I don't grok what's wrong about complaining about the price, especially the BTO prices for parts that aren't even Apple's ;)
It's one thing to complain about Apple's upgrading pricing, it's another to imply that Macs 8gb ram are utterly gimped and incapable of performing even the most basic of tasks (people here seem to think that you need 16gb ram just to open a few chrome tabs). :rolleyes:


I mean, if we want a real-world example of what a 8gb Mac mini is capable of...

Spoiler - quite a lot, actually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee

macaddiict

macrumors regular
Oct 22, 2005
149
240
Albuquerque, NM
I would say even 16 GB is now too scarce, for a base spec workstation Mac.
Try 32 GB or even 64 GB RAM and keep the price tags. Now we talk value for the money you pay.
I have a 32GB model and am shocked how often it runs of of memory and swaps. Basically, open any major non-Apple app (Adobe, Microsoft, etc) and within minutes the thing is swapping...
 

heath_durbin

macrumors member
Sep 21, 2015
79
26
What do you think Apple has been experiencing for the past 2 decades? They are reaping the benefits of having an integrated ecosystem because they were the only company willing to invest in having an ecosystem in the first place.

So yeah, I for one certainly hope that Apple continues to reap these benefits for a good long time to come. :cool:
Yes, but, I also hope they keeping improving or they will lose it fast.
 

heath_durbin

macrumors member
Sep 21, 2015
79
26
I'd like to see the new base for all MACs to be 32 GB... and then they can hold steady for a while.

The down side of wanting this is, they can make the older computer obsolete faster, by making the new software require the more memory.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Again, bugs are a completely other story. If you have a bad memory leak that is an issue that needs to be fixed. That's a straw-man argument, FYI. This discussion is around general RAM required for operating day to day with functional software. 8GB is pathetic on any new machine at the price point Apple charges. Sure, I have an 8GB RasberryPi that is great with 8GB and even 4GB, but it's a small embedded computer not meant to do much at the end of the day and costs less than $100. Come to think of it, it has 8GB RAM and costs less than $100 for the whole thing. For what Apple is charging, it should start at 16GB for even the base model. If you are consistently seeing red memory pressure on your system (and the software you are working with isn't bugged), You need more RAM. Period.

Just a note, the RaspberryPi 5 uses LPDDR4X-4267 SDRAM, which happens to be the same as the memory used with the M1. The newer Macs and all Pro versions use LPDDR5X, which does probably cost a couple dollars more, sure.
8 GB of RAM is enough to do quite a bit of decent 4k video editing work and Photoshop work. One of my clients have several base M1 iMacs that have this workflow.

This is not a strawman argument because the context is "Red memory pressure = get more RAM". And you explained why this isn't a binary decision in your first two sentences. RAM discussion is more than a one sentence recommendation. I have SAVED many of my clients from wasting money on RAM upgrade moving away from RAM heavy Adobe to Affinity for example. They had lower RAM usage and it performed better for their workflow.

People are just being overly dramatic in this whole RAM discussion. Like I said, There is NO WAY I can use a system less than 128GB of RAM. But I don't go around saying how horrible 64GB of RAM is. I would personally prefer 128GB of RAM to be the base! I don't think anyone would argue otherwise. I also wish RTX 4090s don't cost $1,500+. I also wish my crappy Microsoft Surface Laptop didn't cost $2,000+

Buy the RAM you need and be done with it.
 

aarond12

macrumors 65816
May 20, 2002
1,146
107
Dallas, TX USA
8 GB of RAM is enough to do quite a bit of decent 4k video editing work and Photoshop work. One of my clients have several base M1 iMacs that have this workflow.
Wow. I had to look up the minimum system requirements for Final Cut Pro, and... it's 8GB (16GB recommended). I can't imagine doing editing on a system with 8GB RAM. Especially in 4K.

Oh, and don't badmouth my 64GB RAM video editing system! (kidding) :p
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Wow. I had to look up the minimum system requirements for Final Cut Pro, and... it's 8GB (16GB recommended). I can't imagine doing editing on a system with 8GB RAM. Especially in 4K.

Oh, and don't badmouth my 64GB RAM video editing system! (kidding) :p
It certainly won’t cover extreme 4K editing. That is why RAM recommendations are more conversational. And when you deal with clients that have departments that have 50+ computers, forcing unnecessary upgrades can cost thousands or hundreds of thousands.
 

truthsteve

macrumors 6502a
Nov 3, 2023
855
2,521
How about saying it doesn't make sense that a single tasking device should have as much or more memory than a multi-tasking computer?
Sure it does make sense.

When I play a game, it's a single task on both platforms and these games are the primary use case for 8GB. Also iPhone has a major use case that Mac doesn't: AR which uses TONS of memory.

In looking at a few of your other posts, I'm wondering - In your opinion, is there any Apple behavior worthy of criticism?


I already criticized Apple for failing to drop unnecessary features from Vision Pro that would have easily dropped the price tag substantially.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.