Yeah, even if you had a 1080p webcam, most video conferencing software caps it at 720p30 or 720p60 due to bandwidth.I thought the 720p Macbook webcam to be underwhelming as well just based on the spec without any personal experience, but is it really? This video was quite a surprise for me. And considering how most of us are video conferencing into an almost stamp-size gallery view of zoom, I am starting to think if we are over-criticizing the 720p webcam just because of the spec.
Definitely, but if we went back to the threads when the Macbooks were announced, plenty of people quickly judged the Webcam to be poor (including myself). But apparently it's pretty good, at least from this video.It’s a feature. Cams are 18 inches to the face? Most of us don’t want high def.
We don’t even like people who take pictures of their kids at the School Xmas show with an iPad. Do we want them doing it with a laptop?
Did you watch the video comparison?COVID-19 made the 720p obviously bad. Although thoe of use with a full frame DSLR could really use their cameras as a webcam
COVID-19 made the 720p obviously bad. Although thoe of use with a full frame DSLR could really use their cameras as a webcam
If you're used to watching TV and movies in 1080p and 4K you do notice the difference.Can you actually notice 720p vs 1080p on a video conference? What software are you using? I use Teams daily, Zoom on occasion, and have also run a personal Jitsi instance. On all of these the image is compressed so much for bandwidth you really cannot tell the difference.
The front facing cameras on my iPhone and iPad Pro are 1080p but in a video chat you just cannot tell.
I think the "more light" is the more important part, not the resolution. And seem alike that's what the M1 improved upon thanks to practically the iPhone 's ISP, now inside a Mac. Most often, people set lights to shine on their laptops so they can see it, not shining light onto their own face.If you're used to watching TV and movies in 1080p and 4K you do notice the difference.
I use Zoom, Google Meeting and FaceTime. Sometimes viber.
If you have a point & shoot, mirrorless or dslr give it a try to do a video conference. The camera captures more light and the lens has improved optics.
It's largely cosmetic
It isn't just that.I think the "more light" is the more important part, not the resolution. And seem alike that's what the M1 improved upon thanks to practically the iPhone 's ISP, now inside a Mac. Most often, people set lights to shine on their laptops so they can see it, not shining light onto their own face.
You are comparing a $1500 camera that is more expensive than even the Macbook Air itself.It isn't just that.
I use a 5Ds R or 7D Mark II through FaceTime and it's night or day regardless if i'm facing the morning sun on a cloudless day or have large soft studio lights
I always get asked how come my video looks so sharp, vibrant and awesome.
You are comparing a $1500 camera that is more expensive than even the Macbook Air itself.
Do you think recommending one to go buy a $1500 DSLR just so they can look better on a zoom call makes sense?
iMac has a 1080p webcam.If Apple had upgraded to a 1080p camera people would be complaining that it should be 4k. They tweaked the camera performance to hit a sweet spot for everyday video conferencing and kept the price down. I'm sure the upscale models to be announced in the future will have higher resolution cameras. Not everybody makes regular use of built in cameras on laptops even now. And nothing prevents anyone who wants to use a better camera from investing in one and using it with their M1 laptop.
Resolution isnt a be all end all. Image quality also dependent of image sensor quality and size and the optics/lens used.I don't have an issue with the quality. I believe that Zoom is limited to 720p (in most cases) anyway. The issue that I have is the flicker under LCD lighting which makes it unusable.
Can't argue that a 5D or other full-frame camera will outperform the 720p webcam in an M1.It's that cheap now? I received both cameras a week before its local release over 5 years ago.
What I'm saying is if you have these cameras now then use them with your video conferencing so it becomes useful again.
Now if you want to buy them then that's something all together different.
TBH Canon, Nikon, Sony, et al should have offered software to use these large image sensor cameras as webcams over a decade go. It would have increased sales.
I agree better light will always beat more ISO or more MP or larger pixels.Can't argue that a 5D or other full-frame camera will outperform the 720p webcam in an M1.
That said, improving the lighting on your face when you're videoconferencing can make a huge difference. I'm a photographer as well, and I use some affordable LED lights or sometimes a ring light and it's night and day in terms of how I look on screen.