Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. No - from my experience (1st Gen iPhone to 3GS) AT&T has done very well..I have had great service. Big cities, small cities, out in the boondocks of middle of no where.....AT&T service was always available. Could they improve? Sure. I think we all could say that AT&T could improve, I believe that they are attempting to improve service and keep up with demand, however it seems they are a little overwhelmed. I would like to see them capitalize more on the Apple / AT&T partnership.

2. No...I think AT&T is doing the best they can with trying to keep up with the demand the iPhone requires, I just hope they realize the power of the iPhone before its too late.

3. Verizon is just "wanting what they don't have" and even if Verizon "acquired" the iPhone and gave me free lifetime service, I would never switch!

Excellent questions eezing!



I cosign this statement...I was with Cingular when AT&T bought them out and I have always had excellent coverage EVERYWHERE I go...and I've had all three versions of iPhone since 07...I can't really see what all the fuss is about...I've recently went to the bay area and I had excellent signal and 3G coverage...as I posted on another thread, maybe I'm lucky?
 
Ive never once had an issue with Att in my area, even out in the middle of nowhere i was still getting 3g. The graphs they show while true are misleading. You look at the 3g ATT maps and all the metropolitan areas are covered. The people in rural areas are less likely to be using blackberries/iphones so theres really no need for 3g coverage out in those areas.

I think the biggest untruth is being made by AT&T. The famous more bars in more places is out and out false advertisement. You ever notice having full bars on 3G, and yet missing calls ? I've had full bars while in 3G, and missed texts even. Then I switch to Edge, and no problem. I'm in NYC, and most places I have great reception. But I work in Jersey City, and my reception is downright laughable. In fact, I turn my phone right to Edge the minute I get to work, otherwise I miss calls or texts. And yes, it ALWAYS shows full bars while on 3G here in Jersey City, when in reality, at most, it should show half a bar.

The funniest phenomenom is taking the LIRR back from the city to where I live in Great Neck Long Island, NY. While on the train, the stop right before mine, Little Neck, I have no reception. In Great Neck, the next town over, no problems (thank God). If the iPhone goes to Verizon, I'll be the first guy on line to go with them. Verizon blows away AT&T in most major cities (I know for a fact that this is true in New York, Most Cities in New Jersey, San Francisco and LA). I've even seen people with Verizon phones talking while still in the LIRR tunnels.
 
I cosign this statement...I was with Cingular when AT&T bought them out and I have always had excellent coverage EVERYWHERE I go...and I've had all three versions of iPhone since 07...I can't really see what all the fuss is about...I've recently went to the bay area and I had excellent signal and 3G coverage...as I posted on another thread, maybe I'm lucky?

It depends where and when. When I get into downtown San Francisco at 7, I have great 3G reception and all is well. It gets worse as the day progresses, peaking around Noon.

When I go to the Albany/Berkeley area, no 3G coverage at all.

I read a number of posts that reception quality depends on the number of phones on the network, not sure if it's true or not but my experience seems to jive with that.
 
AT&T coverage is excellent here in Philly. I was told in these parts is the most towers and therefore the most outages. But I never experienced any long term outages.

Marc
 
You ever notice having full bars on 3G, and yet missing calls ? I've had full bars while in 3G, and missed texts even. Then I switch to Edge, and no problem. I'm in NYC, and most places I have great reception.
If you haven't already seen it, the issue you described has been explained:

All iPhone apps, including Phone.app, cause the radio to switch from "active" to "idle" mode when accessing the network far more often than traditional phones do. This causes the signaling channel, responsible for such functions as SMS messaging, initiating, maintaining, or ending a phone call, voicemail notifications, and DHCP requests, to become overloaded.

"This can lead to odd effects," the source told Ars. "For example, you could be in an area with perfect 5-bar reception, but because the signalling channel is overloaded your phone won't ring and calls go into voicemail." Our source also said that the iPhone was the first phone to cause this particular problem, but that Android and webOS phones have had a similar effect.
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2...-iphone-service-is-apples-fault-is-bunkum.ars
 
It depends where and when. When I get into downtown San Francisco at 7, I have great 3G reception and all is well. It gets worse as the day progresses, peaking around Noon.

When I go to the Albany/Berkeley area, no 3G coverage at all.

I read a number of posts that reception quality depends on the number of phones on the network, not sure if it's true or not but my experience seems to jive with that.

I was up and down Telegraph St. all that whole day..I went into Berkley had full signal strength, and even on the BART
 
I was up and down Telegraph St. all that whole day..I went into Berkley had full signal strength, and even on the BART

Telegraph is OK for me too, Cal campus is sketchy for me; if I stand underneath an overhang I get no coverage at all, but I walk about 10 feet from out underneath it and it's all peachy.

As for BART, service is great for me up until around the Hayward area, at which point the phone goes roaming for some reason.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.