I am not aware of any backup product that uses iCloud. Remember that iCloud and iCloud Drive are for synchronisation.iCloud backups will work for you
I am not aware of any backup product that uses iCloud. Remember that iCloud and iCloud Drive are for synchronisation.iCloud backups will work for you
Because the Synology supports it to back itself up and it's super cheap. I never claimed it to be optimal, it was a good idea at the time but the time has passed.Why would someone use Glacier (Amazon's Business "cold storage") for home usage? Unless one have vast terabytes to consider and isn't interested in retrieving often the stored data...lots better options out there. AWS really is not a typical solution for home users.
There is no iCloud backup for MacOS. At best, it's a syncing service, which is very different than a backup solution as it doesn't save versions.
1. Why is that? I'm looking at TM backups over WiFi for a MBP's internal to a Synology NAS. Is it an issue with 3"5 NAS HDDs or also 2"5 SSD's in the bays? Note: I would not be using Synology branded drives.If that is your only backup that is extremely risky due to 1) the tendency of TM backups to fail 2) NAS TM backups are even more prone to failure.
1. Why is that? I'm looking at TM backups over WiFi for a MBP's internal to a Synology NAS. Is it an issue with 3"5 NAS HDDs or also 2"5 SSD's in the bays? Note: I would not be using Synology branded drives.
2. I have SuperDuper (paid). Could this theoretically also work with option 1. above, instead of TM? Or must SD be DAS?
Thanks for the warning, I believe I've read that sparse bundle is also used with Synology's backup. Indeed their software can in itself make snapshots but only with their own branded drives (ridiculously expensive).I use to use a time capsule wireless back up with Time Machine and that would create files into a container called a sparsebundle and that would very often corrupt. Sometimes once a year. I’m not sure if a synolgy uses a sparesebundle but if it does then I can vouch for them being unreliable.
Honestly, I don't think WiFi is a good idea at all. However, there are ways to do it that afford some level of safety such as backup to a local drive then that drive becomes the source for data going to the NAS. This should also help free up your system with faster backup and less prone to errors.Thanks for the warning, I believe I've read that sparse bundle is also used with Synology's backup. Indeed their software can in itself make snapshots but only with their own branded drives (ridiculously expensive).
I also wonder, can cloning i.e. Super Duper (paid) work wireless? Would that then also be at high risk of corruption in this scenario? Cloning wireless to the Synology?
Thanks for the warning, I believe I've read that sparse bundle is also used with Synology's backup. Indeed their software can in itself make snapshots but only with their own branded drives (ridiculously expensive).
I also wonder, can cloning i.e. Super Duper (paid) work wireless? Would that then also be at high risk of corruption in this scenario? Cloning wireless to the Synology?
OK, my suggestions.
Use either CarbonCopyCloner or SuperDuper.
DO NOT use time machine.
Use TWO backup drives (at least).
One is kept at home, near the computer.
The other is kept "off-site" (i.e., not "in the house").
I keep my "off-site" backup in the car. It's the only drive that has encryption on it.
If someone stole the car, they'd get "a drive" -- but NOT my important data.
Much of the same opinion and if one insisted on a NAS copy, use the eternal drive with the backup and synch it via USB directly to the NAS.I had such a bad time with time capsule over wifi its put me off wireless back ups. What are you backing up exactly and how often?
if I was in your shoes I'd just buy a Samsung 2TB SSD if thats enough and just back it up to that when required. I'd buy a 2nd one as well for redundancy.
I was using a Lacie 2 big but have since been using the Samsungs as I find them lightweight and convenient but also very quiet!
Which complications?2. Not sure of the value of clones these days. Cause more complications than they are worth.
Why is that? I'm looking at TM backups over WiFi for a MBP's internal to a Synology NAS. Is it an issue with 3"5 NAS HDDs or also 2"5 SSD's in the bays? Note: I would not be using Synology branded drives.
can cloning i.e. Super Duper (paid) work wireless? Would that then also be at high risk of corruption in this scenario? Cloning wireless to the Synology?
Ok. I haven't as yet bought any NAS equipment yet, researching. You mean backup my internal to a DAS and take that to the NAS?Honestly, I don't think WiFi is a good idea at all. However, there are ways to do it that afford some level of safety such as backup to a local drive then that drive becomes the source for data going to the NAS. This should also help free up your system with faster backup and less prone to errors.
Documents, photo editing with Capture1, all on the internal. In a way I presumed this would immediately then be mirrored on my TM NAS as I'm working. We're at most talking RAW conversions of in the lower GB territory.I had such a bad time with time capsule over wifi its put me off wireless back ups. What are you backing up exactly and how often?
if I was in your shoes I'd just buy a Samsung 2TB SSD if thats enough and just back it up to that when required. I'd buy a 2nd one as well for redundancy.
I was using a Lacie 2 big but have since been using the Samsungs as I find them lightweight and convenient but also very quiet!
similar to my use. I am biased due to my bad experience with NAS but I would recommend either a Lacie 2 big set up or my current set up which is a couple of the Samsung T7 in rotation. I only started using these because they were cheap to buy but also very fast and silent. The Lacie 2 big is great but its only when you use the Samsung you realise how nosey they are.Documents, photo editing with Capture1, all on the internal. In a way I presumed this would immediately then be mirrored on my TM NAS as I'm working. We're at most talking RAW conversions of in the lower GB territory.
Indeed my initial plan was buying 2 x 2TB NVMe USB-S drives. One local for with TM, the other offsite, rotated with Super Duper. Off course this equation wouldn't have worked out as I'd need a much larger drive for TM. That's where I thought the Synology would come in handy with either 2x 4TB SSD and/ or 3"5 2 x 8TB NAS HDD's.OK, my suggestions.
Use either CarbonCopyCloner or SuperDuper.
DO NOT use time machine.
Use TWO backup drives (at least).
One is kept at home, near the computer.
The other is kept "off-site" (i.e., not "in the house").
I keep my "off-site" backup in the car. It's the only drive that has encryption on it.
If someone stole the car, they'd get "a drive" -- but NOT my important data.
That's another consideration I guess with NAS. I'd would need to be in the living room and would solely only be used for backups from this one MBP. I've no idea how noisy a couple 3"5 8TB and 2 fans in the NAS enclosure would ultimately be. It would have been a 4 bay Synology, 2 8TB NAS IronWolfs Pro and or 2 4TB Evo870s, a network switch and reliance on my tethered master mesh node to play nicely. It's a lot of money. If this had 100% no risk of corruption possibility I wouldn't be second guessing all this.similar to my use. I am biased due to my bad experience with NAS but I would recommend either a Lacie 2 big set up or my current set up which is a couple of the Samsung T7 in rotation. I only started using these because they were cheap to buy but also very fast and silent. The Lacie 2 big is great but its only when you use the Samsung you realise how nosey they are.