So... I'm wondering which one would be better to use: the new macOS feature or Al Dente. I have no doubt that Apple's feature would work well, however, I'm pretty sure that it's dumbed down somewhat because obviously Apple wouldn't want users to be stuck at 50 or 80% of the battery all the time.
I think it's pretty much known now that the battery management feature works by draining to ~90% and then back to 100% on average once a day (this has happened to me 6 times in the past week, and my Mac was on AC power the whole time). However, this increase the charge cycles.
Would it be better in any way to use Al Dente? Does anyone have any knowledge from Battery University or something? From what I can tell, Al Dente is better because a) it doesn't use up ANY charge cycles since the Mac is running on AC the whole time, and b) you can set it at 50% or whatever which is better for storage than 100% most of the time.
Any thoughts?
I think it's pretty much known now that the battery management feature works by draining to ~90% and then back to 100% on average once a day (this has happened to me 6 times in the past week, and my Mac was on AC power the whole time). However, this increase the charge cycles.
Would it be better in any way to use Al Dente? Does anyone have any knowledge from Battery University or something? From what I can tell, Al Dente is better because a) it doesn't use up ANY charge cycles since the Mac is running on AC the whole time, and b) you can set it at 50% or whatever which is better for storage than 100% most of the time.
Any thoughts?