zign macrumors 6502 Apr 9, 2006 284 0 London May 17, 2006 #26 MBP 2.0Ghz, 2GB Test 1 : Single thread performance test - 11s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate) - 39s So, what does this all mean?
MBP 2.0Ghz, 2GB Test 1 : Single thread performance test - 11s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate) - 39s So, what does this all mean?
dmw007 macrumors G4 May 26, 2005 10,635 0 Working for MI-6 May 17, 2006 #27 zign said: MBP 2.0Ghz, 2GB Test 1 : Single thread performance test - 11s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate) - 39s So, what does this all mean? Click to expand... It means that the MacBook Pro is frackin ® fast!
zign said: MBP 2.0Ghz, 2GB Test 1 : Single thread performance test - 11s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate) - 39s So, what does this all mean? Click to expand... It means that the MacBook Pro is frackin ® fast!
dpaanlka macrumors 601 Nov 16, 2004 4,869 34 Illinois May 17, 2006 #28 Test 1 : Single thread performance test: 19s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate): 96s 1.8ghz G4 AGP Tower. Why such a huge difference between numbers?
Test 1 : Single thread performance test: 19s Test 2: Multi thread performance test (more accurate): 96s 1.8ghz G4 AGP Tower. Why such a huge difference between numbers?
Eidorian macrumors Penryn Mar 23, 2005 29,191 386 Indianapolis May 17, 2006 #29 Test 1: 22 seconds Test 2: 102 seconds
smartalic34 macrumors 6502a May 16, 2006 977 61 USA May 17, 2006 #30 sorry for the confusion... the 44 secs was for the single thread test... I forgot about the multi-thread one Test 1: Single thread test: 44 secs (not too bad for a decrepit G4 right?) Test 2: Multi thread test (more accurate): 182 secs everyone laugh at the slow 800 MHz G4
sorry for the confusion... the 44 secs was for the single thread test... I forgot about the multi-thread one Test 1: Single thread test: 44 secs (not too bad for a decrepit G4 right?) Test 2: Multi thread test (more accurate): 182 secs everyone laugh at the slow 800 MHz G4
jhu macrumors 6502a Apr 4, 2004 854 1 May 17, 2006 #31 sempron 64 1.6ghz: 64-bit 1) 18 seconds 2) 94 seconds 32-bit 1) 15 seconds 2) 73 seconds anyone want to explain these results to me? ie why is the 32-bit result faster than the 64-bit result???
sempron 64 1.6ghz: 64-bit 1) 18 seconds 2) 94 seconds 32-bit 1) 15 seconds 2) 73 seconds anyone want to explain these results to me? ie why is the 32-bit result faster than the 64-bit result???
4God macrumors 68020 Apr 5, 2005 2,133 267 My Mac May 17, 2006 #32 TEST 1: 11 seconds TEST 2: 19 seconds G5 Quad.
dmw007 macrumors G4 May 26, 2005 10,635 0 Working for MI-6 May 17, 2006 #33 4God said: G5 Quad. Click to expand... Gotta love it! Such amazing power the Power Mac G5 Quad has to offer.
4God said: G5 Quad. Click to expand... Gotta love it! Such amazing power the Power Mac G5 Quad has to offer.