That was a real nice deal. It's price has gone up steadily for the past few months. I bought mine new for around $670.00 or so three years ago.
Which version of the lens did you get? The mark 1's can be had for a lot cheaper than the mark 2's.
That was a real nice deal. It's price has gone up steadily for the past few months. I bought mine new for around $670.00 or so three years ago.
I bought the USM II, which comes with a detachable hood. This one:Which version of the lens did you get? The mark 1's can be had for a lot cheaper than the mark 2's.
Although I'm still a beginner when it comes to photography, I don't understand why flash photography is rarely mentioned. I can understand if the shooting conditions forbid or frown on using a flash but most times it doesn't.
I'm still not sure what the OP is shooting? Natural light portraits? Macro? Birds? I know you want 2.8, but why?
The best addition to your 30 1.4 is a zoom like the 17-85 or a used 17-40. IMHO.
If the OP wants to shoot in low light, he better spend some big cash in fast lenses, and expensive flashes. Otherwise he has no options but to boost ISO.
(although that 100mm f/2 and 200mm L is mk 1 is looking pretty good).
That is a great site!
I shoot mainly natural light portraits but I generally would like to try to expand to different areas. Mainly sports and street photography.
In fact, I owned the 17-85, and honestly, I discovered that I could cover much of that zoom range by moving my feet with the Sigma 30.
at first I thought you meant the prime-junta site. Since this is written by a finn I thought it might perhaps be you ( finland not having much inhabitants ). I checked, then I noticed you were referring to the digital picture site. getting old....
Well there are 5 million people in Finland so I don't know everyone