Yep, SSD is key, an it makes the same machine feel like a whole new computer.
You need more memory and an SSD system drive. So yes. If you can wait for M1 iMacs to be available.I just don't know why is Big Sur is so slow to load at startup. I took out any app that's at startup and even took out the Adobe illustrator app and kept Photoshop and it's still slow. I can walk away make coffee and brush my teeth and it's still loading. My computer may be old:
(iMac Retina 5K, 27in, Late 2015) (Processor 3.2 GHz, Quad-core intel Core i5) (Memory 8 GB 1867 MHz DDR3) Graphics (AMD Radeon R9 M380 2 GB)
Now, I honestly don't know what all that means but this is my computer. I just finished dumping all my school stuff on an external hard drive to release some space and in hopes of having my computer run better but it hasn't. Do you think it's time for a new computer?
I just don't know why is Big Sur is so slow to load at startup.
you could boot to an external SSD for a small cost,
Do you have SSD or HD?
I had a 2012 4-core i7 MacMini with a Fusion drive. When I upgraded to a 1TB Sandisk SSD I got much better performance. The Apple SSD was only 128 GB and operated slower than the Sandisk SSD. MacFusion=183 MBps vs 286 MBps for the dedicated 1TB SanDisk system SSD. Buy a 1TB SSD USB3 and strap it to the back. If it's still too slow then buy a new iMac when M1 iMacs are released and use the 1 TB SSD for something else.I have the fusion drive. As noted, it was lightning fast to boot (13 seconds) on Catalina, and my apps were snappy and smooth, too.
I have nothing in the startup at all- now it takes 30 seconds to boot, and as noted the apps are slower.
I am disappointed that my Mac that I just bought new about a year ago took such a big step backwards performance wise already with an os upgrade...
I agree. I think it was a mistake for Apple to move to a new file system that pretty much requires fast SSD to perform as expected. While the benefits are good, there is no easy way to get older machines to play nice. It seems as though they made some allowances for the last flavor of 10.15, but optimized more for SSD on MacOS 11.I have the fusion drive. As noted, it was lightning fast to boot (13 seconds) on Catalina, and my apps were snappy and smooth, too.
I have nothing in the startup at all- now it takes 30 seconds to boot, and as noted the apps are slower.
I am disappointed that my Mac that I just bought new about a year ago took such a big step backwards performance wise already with an os upgrade...
It won't get better. You have a hard drive, and no OS newer than about 10.13 is going to run well.Damn, I feel like I'm using a Windows computer. My Mac is so slow it's really pissing me off. With every update, my computer does not improve. I could open 2 things at one time and it feels like forever for one of them to open. For example; I open Safari and while that's preparing to open I click a folder to open and then it's a race to see who opens first.
I agree. I think it was a mistake for Apple to move to a new file system that pretty much requires fast SSD to perform as expected. While the benefits are good, there is no easy way to get older machines to play nice. It seems as though they made some allowances for the last flavor of 10.15, but optimized more for SSD on MacOS 11.
Assuming this is the case, your options are to live with the lag, roll back to the previous OS, or upgrade (either the storage or the entire Mac).
I am typing this on a 2014 MBP running OS 11 pretty darn good...but with SS storage.
I just timed my 2014 MBP with a 1TB SSD and it takes ~47 seconds from initial Apple logo appearance to the Log-in screen. The best upgrade you can do to an older Mac is an SSD.
one that attaches to the thunderbolt 2 port on your computer. These are relatively hard to find now, since new machines have thunderbolt 3 or 4
That is a noticeable difference, you should downgrade back to Catalina. I seldom shut my MBP down so a ~20 second difference in boot times would not affect me in any meaningful way; BS doesnt feel slower in operation than Ca did on my old Mac so I'm not worried about that aspect of it.With Catalina, my iMac with fusion drive was 13 seconds from initial Apple logo to login screen... now with the Big Sur upgrade I’m at 35 seconds... I’m sure an ssd upgrade would help, but this thing is barely over a year old- and was very fast before this ill-advised upgrade to Big Sur.![]()
Please, man, have you tried that solution? Most external enclosures are bus-powered. The adaptor you’re referring to does not work with bus-powered devices. The OP is looking for an inexpensive solution, a powered tb3 enclosure is not cheap.In that case you just use a Thunderbolt 2 > 3 adapter.
That is a noticeable difference, you should downgrade back to Catalina. I seldom shut my MBP down so a ~20 second difference in boot times would not affect me in any meaningful way; BS doesnt feel slower in operation than Ca did on my old Mac so I'm not worried about that aspect of it.
Sounds like you have SS storage. Otherwise, you would see SBBOD* quite a bit on 10.15 or later.I rarely see the ball on my 2014 MBP.
Please, man, have you tried that solution? Most external enclosures are bus-powered.