As far as what the drives can do, no, it's not wrong.
That comment was only in reference to what was on hand, not a general statement.Actually SSDs would be faster than SAS drives for a boot drive.
eBay.
You can't use the SAS disks on the logic board, so you will need a card for that. Sorry about any confusion here.
Assuming you don't need additional ports (4), then take a serious look at the ARC-1212 (linked above). 4 port, SAS card, and it can boot OS X once it's been flashed with the EFI firmware.
I've used them professionally and for my personal system as well (different models, but the one linked will work quite well, as it's very similar to the 1680 series, just SAS expander support was eliminated).
Assuming you use this card (or another), you can do what you want with it in terms of array level (provided you've enough drives for the levels it supports). As you've 4x SAS disks, you can even go with a RAID 5 if you choose.
Just make sure you've a UPS, and the battery option for the card is a good idea too.
I no longer have a MP (had a 2008, which wasn't the best fit for my storage requirements; possible to do, but too costly, and what little OS X software available wasn't very good vs. Windows based products <equivalents, not the same vendor selling their products cross-platform>).How did you installed ARC 12-12 in MacPro ? Your MacPro is 2009 or 2010 model ?
alphaod: those numbers are really nice, but they seem too high, for a set of 4 VR's.
What's the file size used in the tests?
I ask, as it appears that the data is being skewed by the cache (which is nice, so the numbers are accurate for small files). But if you want to know what it does on a file larger than the cache can contain, you can do a couple of things.