Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I prefer the iPhone photos for the most part, but that is because I am familiar with many of these places and have seen them with my own eyes. Things that “look dark” are actually representative of the dingy concrete of the Empire State Building for example. The taxi photo is tougher, because it really depends on if the car was recently washed, but the pixel seems closer to what the natural color is on a sunny day.
 
Don't know if it's the settings, but the black point seems elevated on all the Pixel shots, leaving them looking washed out from a lack of contrast. It's hard to believe it would look like that by default. And the iPhone shots look a little too dark and contrasty, although I'd prefer that in most cases if I had to choose.
The Pixel has a separate shadow exposure slider in its camera app. I do wish you could tweak the default setting, though. Or, even better, maybe store all the data that's captured so you can decide in post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiRez
Comparing pictures side by side without actually being there in person doesn't work. No one knows what those scenes actually look like to an objective naked eye.

The best I can say is that the pics of NY look more accurate on the iPhone than the pixel. Pixel seems to add a lot of blue that probably isn't there if you were viewing the sky in person.

Secondly, I have a few of those snake plants with the yellow border and the iPhone 15 is way more accurate in terms of color temp and saturation. I decided to put one of my plants on my desk to compare. The iPhone accurately reflects the true color of the yellow where as the pixel is dull and washed out. But my plants are healthy. I suppose if that plant is unhealthy then the pixel is more accurate.
 
Last edited:
If you like a bit more Pixel-like colors, set your photographic style to Vibrant. I really enjoy Vibrant or High Contrast, depending on the scenery.
 
the fact that Samsung zoom is just way better

It depends what you're shooting. If you need a 10X focal length in good light, the Samsung zoom is better. If you want a 5X focal length and/or are shooting in lower light, the 15 Pro Max is going to be better. Remember the Samsung 10X is a much darker lens (ie. much smaller maximum aperture).
 
I've had a decent run of having the latest or near-latest iPhones and Pixels for a while now, and after shooting lots of photos with each, it's always come down to the iPhone is better at these and the Pixel is better at those, but "these" and "those" switch around a lot as generations go by. A generation or two ago, the Pixel just plain out obliterated the iPhone at in-motion night shots (example: monorail at night at Walt Disney World), and the same-gen iPhone blew away the Pixel for most day shots. I look forward to the 8 Pro arriving shortly so I can compare with the 15 Pro Max and figure out - again - which phone to use when. The images in this article suggest to me that there will be definite times to use each.

But, as many have said, they're all - meaning any flagship - good enough for most people, most of the time, and they all can mess up at times. I'm enjoying the overall improvement over the years, but I've also been disappointed in just how much post-processing occurs by default. It leads too often to zoomed-in images having a watercolor look. I see that in the 15 Pro Max. I'm sure I'll see it in the 8 Pro.
 
I'm clearly in the minority of people who really are struggling to fully like or get excited about the magic editor features these phones keep pushing. Like, when your picture is so edited to remove things and move subjects around and all that, its not even a real photo anymore? Nothing about it is real so you're saving a memory of something that didn't even exist/happen. Idk. Maybe in time I will grow to like it or welcome it but right now it doesn't elicit the excitement everyone else has.
 
At first glance I thought a win for pixel. Then looking closer again I thought, mostly a win for the iphone for a variety of reasons. However, clearly the iphone tends towards over saturation of colors which gets old fast.
 
It depends what you're shooting. If you need a 10X focal length in good light, the Samsung zoom is better. If you want a 5X focal length and/or are shooting in lower light, the 15 Pro Max is going to be better. Remember the Samsung 10X is a much darker lens (ie. much smaller maximum aperture).

Which kind of makes sense because you’re not going to be trying to shoot something very far away in dim light, can’t see it anyway.

I will say it looks closer this year and 5x seems to be best on the iPhone. And of course if you actually want video the iPhone is basically the only option, far better than the competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiRez
I have had an iPhone since 2007 but I must admit the Pixel pictures look better. It’s all about software post processing at this point, google won this game round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: witchcult
I own a Nikon D3. It's a 2007 camera and it's gonna be 20 years before a smartphone can match it.
 
I always hate these kind of A/B samples because we weren't at the actual location so we can't tell what the lighting and colors were actually like. But they do provide enough info tell if something is generally "off." In this respect, I find the Pixel's pics look more natural looking - I prefer the Pixel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Persecki
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.