The video can't be independently verified.
Supply pictures (original) w/ full EXIF. One needs to be able to evaluate the noise. The dynamic range and detail.
There is no doubt a higher MP will have better detail but that is not an indicator of quality. Noise, linear steps of dynamic range are quantifiable objective metrics.
Secondly, his low-light is nowhere to what I call "low-light"
Go outside at 4AM and take a picture and come back to me.
Take a picture of some kids running around a 10x10 room w/ a 20 watt bulb in the middle.
Take pictures of mix exposures. A subject against a back-lit window. This will test the metering of the camera's software. the IP6 plus shines here.
These are tangible tests.
I agree, I would prefer if people tested real world situations
I was amazed by reviews of the s5 camera. But once I got the phone, I found that low light pictures were super noisy. I also found the focus to be inconsistent on closer up objects. It does take great daytime photos though.
Software quirks were there too, I did miss a few good shots due to lag. Hopefully these are fixed with the note 4.
EDIT:
Just watched the video above, why do the iphone pictures look super hazy? Did he have a fingerprint on it or something? The colors on the front iPhone 6 cam are definitely better than the note 4. The note 4 does have more detail, but thats expected as it is ~3x the resolution.
