Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just push your machine 100% when you need to. If it dies get it replaced for free by Apple (assuming you were wise enough to buy Applecare).

I left my old macbook roasting away overnight running at 100% most nights for a year or so, eventually it died. Took it to Apple and got a new one. It's their problem not mine if they can't implement better cooling.

Once your 3 years of warranty are almost up sell it on and get a new one.;)
 
You must accept some things:

* your new purchase is unsuitable for heavy load. It is suitable for reading, browsing, some movies ( not HD or flash HD, because of lack or properly supported hardware acceleration), chat, mail, Skype... small things, generally.

This is rubbish.

Nowhere does it say that the mini is only suitable for "light" use. The hardware inside the new quad mini is perfectly able to beat most consumer macs in processor intensive tasks from previous years by far.

The issue is poor cooling i.e. a design flaw, which is covered fully by your Apple warranty including Applecare.

People are just being way too precious with their machines.
 
You must accept some things:

* your new purchase is unsuitable for heavy load. It is suitable for reading, browsing, some movies ( not HD or flash HD, because of lack or properly supported hardware acceleration), chat, mail, Skype... small things, generally.
* you must be aware that, these temps inside, especially when sustained for long, will considerably shorten the longevity of your new purchase. The most weak spot inside is the HDD, because of the aforementioned thermal "facts". Like the past experience show us this quite clear... .
* Simply, the price you pay, is price paid for the "name" of the product, and surely, does not match the quality of the hardware inside, i.e. for the same money you are be able to make 2-3 fold more power machine. But you choose, and this is your choice only. And fault too.

Sorry but this is complete BS. It is not a light machine but can be used for heavier tasks as well, and yes the quality of the mini is perfectly fine. I have a MBP 2011 and I encode Handbrake everyday on it and it still works so a mini which is even more powerful won't have any problems with it
 
If you think your HDDs within the Mac mini will overheat, then just do not use internal drives, except for a boot SSD. Buy an external FW800 3.5" enclosure, and put a 3 TB drive in it. Buy another FW800 enclosure and another 3 TB disk, if you want to make Time Machine or manual backups. InXtron enclosures support FW800 daisy chaining. It is not too complicated.
 
You must accept some things:

* your new purchase is unsuitable for heavy load. It is suitable for reading, browsing, some movies ( not HD or flash HD, because of lack or properly supported hardware acceleration), chat, mail, Skype... small things, generally.
* you must be aware that, these temps inside, especially when sustained for long, will considerably shorten the longevity of your new purchase. The most weak spot inside is the HDD, because of the aforementioned thermal "facts". Like the past experience show us this quite clear... .
* Simply, the price you pay, is price paid for the "name" of the product, and surely, does not match the quality of the hardware inside, i.e. for the same money you are be able to make 2-3 fold more power machine. But you choose, and this is your choice only. And fault too.

Apple isn't making toys here. These minis are the work horses of many servers and clusters. They are put through heavy load 24/7. My 2006 mini converted well over 200 DVDs. It has been used for games, and work. As of today it is STILL working as my Minecraft server.

The price I pay is for a name that means quality and service. These systems aren't arbitrarily put together. Careful choices are made about cost, power consumption, operation temperatures, and performance with current Apple operating systems and software.
 
The mini's may be a strong computer but don't think they were made for 24/7 100% load. The ones using them in data centers are probably not pegged 100% 24/7 unless the drives were changed out to enterprise drives. Mac pro's or any PC with server chips are made to do heavy work. One of the reasons I built mine instead of using my mini.
 
Evidence? You can make statements like that as much as you want but without any documentation proving your point, it's invalid. Hardware is designed to take the heat, and macs are no exception (regardless of model).

Ive had two MacBook Pros killed by hand break heat issues, and i have a friend (the one who introduced me to hand break) have an iMac killed by it, both of us were told by the Apple store we had them fixed at (thank god for apple care) that the issue seems to have been caused by heat, and we needed to make sure we had plenty of ventilation around the exhausts of the machines.

Also the 1st generation time capsules, the one that had a 75%-80% failure rate and apple eventually had to replace, had an issue where the capacitors in the PSU and/or the hard disk would fail suddenly due to heat stress (this was due to BAD design, a tiny plastic sealed box with a PSU and HDD is going to get HOT, but apple as usual would rather it looked pretty than have decent cooling)

The same design flaws can be seen in the iMac, to keep it pretty and thin the HDD is in the middle of the unit, instead of being near the edge where it could be cooled easier (and replaced easily by being in a removable caddy)

and as far as hand break goes, the Mac Mini and iMac heat sinks are around 1/4 the size of a normal desktop heatsink for the equivalent desktop CPU, if you think that doesn't impact cooling efficiency your mad.

Thermal limits are giving by manufactures as a guide, running at that limit all the time will reduce the life of the components, thats simple physics, drive a car at its top speed it will do all the time and you will wear out the engine/tyres/breaks quicker than if your drove at the speed limit, same with components thermal limits, run at them all the time and your chance of failure goes up exponentially.

Also, do you know that the thermal limit of the CPU might be 105c, but the HDD is probably around 65c, as the case and heatsink fair to get rid of that excess heat, other components heat up inside the case beyond their thermal limits and again , your chance of failure goes up.

Handbreak is a machine killer, its not a case of IF, its a case of WHEN, if you run it without throttling your playing the thermal lottery on all the components in your system, eventually the weakest one (failure is likely in this order, a capacitor in the PSU, a weak solder point, the HDD, or CPU , if your on an iMac you might even discolour or damage the screen from behind the hot-spot)

Breaking news! Desktops don't use notebook components!

Except the Mac Mini and iMac are both escentially laptop computers in a desktop case as far as motherboard, cpu, gnu and ram are concerned. They simply don't have the space required to house the heatsinks needed for desktop components,
 
Last edited:
try video monkey

i have a 2.93 i7 iMac, and handbrake had all 8 cores at 98% load while converting videos. with this cpu usage, it was still taking like 20 minutes! so i switched to an app called video monkey. thus CPU is only running at like 35% and it takes right around 15-20 minutes to convert a .avi movie to mp4 (iTunes format) and me temps are absolutely fine whilst doing it (69-72) :cool:
 
i have a 2.93 i7 iMac, and handbrake had all 8 cores at 98% load while converting videos. with this cpu usage, it was still taking like 20 minutes! so i switched to an app called video monkey. thus CPU is only running at like 35% and it takes right around 15-20 minutes to convert a .avi movie to mp4 (iTunes format) and me temps are absolutely fine whilst doing it (69-72) :cool:
if your cpu is only running at 35% utilization, the app probably isn't taking advantage of all available threads. and depending on what codec the source video used (xvid, mpeg4, h264, wmv, vc1, etc) and what output codec you choose, apps may handle the transcoding process differently. so you really can't do a 1-to-1 speed comparison due to varying encoding parameters used. if you know what you're doing, there are ways to tweak handbrake's x264 options to speed up encoding while not deteriorating pic quality much. video monkey uses ffmpeg, so i'm sure there are ways to set custom parameters to tweak quality as well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.