Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
yjchua95 has made a bold point. I don't think it matters how latest and great the camera or any form of technology is, it's the person behind it all that makes the difference.

I respectfully disagree. When shooting sports and wildlife there is no substitute for fast AF and high frame rates. I had a 5D2 on safari. Fine for the landscape shots but not charging wildlife. The 7D is a far better choice for sports and wildlife. As soon as 5D3 came out, I swapped th 5D2 for it. That is a body that can equally do great stills and also wildlife.
 
Why is this even being asked? Of course a 5D is better than a T4i.
I am wondering about that, too. Full frame is a whole different league imo.
Personally aps-c makes me crinch. :(

----------

yjchua95 has made a bold point. I don't think it matters how latest and great the camera or any form of technology is, it's the person behind it all that makes the difference.
While this is obviously true the equipment does make a difference.
Give an expensive ff dslr with a nice lens to an absolute amateur and put it in auto.
His results will be way better than a cheap dslr, even if he has no clue what he is doing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.