dogbone said:but I also like the bm logo because of it's subtle suggestion of a stylised propeller. They were in the aeroplane manufacturing business before the war.
The best logo you have (probably) never seen...
....
Can someone explain me, why is that a good logo?
The Spartan golf club and CPN are really good examples, how a good logo should be.
The best logo you have (probably) never seen...
OK, thanks for the PR-type explain.
Now, how does it work in black and white?
It's hard to believe that, only about one year ago, Sony Ericsson’s only real branded product was their spherical green logo.
Then again, even their corporate icon was designed to impress. Yesterday, at an informal and intimate product presentation held at Toronto’s Design Exchange building, I had the pleasure of meeting part of the company’s Creative Design Centre team, including vice president Hiroshi Nakaizumi, and art director Takuya Kawagoi, the designer of the distinctive logo.
Although it is meant to look partially like the symbiotic amalgamation of an "s" and a lowercase "e" the logo also represents the company's entire design philosophy, as Kawagoi explained. It's both futuristic and organic, designed to invoke the concepts of flexibility and fluidity. Kawagoi used morphing techniques to draft it in several stages, which is why it's often shown as a quick animation at the end of television ads: with some extra pyrotechnics. Eventually, they may revamp the symbol to make it simpler and more inclusive so the image reflects the evolution and expansion of the company
(Takuya Kawagoi, Sony Ericsson Art Director and designer of the Sony Ericsson Logo)
Works fine imo.
greyscale ≠ black&white
That is what you get under PS image>adjustments>black and white
If you would like it recreated in b&w to your liking, you can talk to the designer Takuya Kawagoi (http://www.zath.co.uk/sony-monolithic-design-concept-interview/).![]()
Seriously though, SE is one of the most successful brands in the world with good reason.
Sony Ericsson is brilliant because it's interesting and it squeezes the hidden meaning of "s" and "e" (representing the merger of the 2 companies) into the logo while invoking the concepts of flexibility and fluidity. Sony Ericsson is different and IS something new altogether, it's not Sony and it's not Ericsson, so the logo is well made imo. It's iconic.
The same interesting concept would apply to FEDEX. You read from the left to the right, the hidden arrow is in between the letters of E and X pointing the way you read. Ie, FedEx is bringing your parcel the right way. It's the same with the Sony Ericson logo; it says more than you see at first.
![]()
On another note, out of curiosity (and I do respect and admire Paul Rand), but can you explain to me (in your opinion) why you like or think "Cummins Engine" is an example of a good logo?