Yah, that’s one of those counterfeit WD Blue SSDs which have come under fire for deceptively similar labelling. Probably worth saving your money and just avoiding, as that unit will probably just bring headaches.
Thanks, I suspected that it was way too good to be true at that price point!
Quality of storage for stuff which means something to me, even when I can’t afford spendier solutions, is the one area I’ll spend especial time, energy, and set aside just a bit more coin to be sure I don’t end up with a dud, especially on something as so either/or (as when an SSD fails).
I learned much of this lesson painfully long ago with pre-owned and recertified drives. It's a situation where you'll end up paying more in the long run if you try to skimp and save too much.
Though not in that price range, WD Blue and WD Red SATA SSDs do exist at sizes of 2TB and 4TB, but by the same token, they’re going to be more expensive than the knock-off.
Yeah, this is why a spinner works out better for me here.
On an upside: they also have pretty good warranties (generally, 5 years) and a DRAM cache inside them (both the Blue and the Red). When I migrated last month to the late 2011 MBP, I moved everything from my iRecdata 256GB SSD (without a DRAM cache) to a 1TB WD Red SATA (which I managed to get on sale here for basically USD$100). It was a lot to spend, but I know I’ll also be using this MBP for a very long time to come and I’ll be pushing it to its limits often, both in SL and HS.
When you consider that these machines are now "ancient" in terms of computing, it's a testament to Apple's engineering (and our resourcefulness) how viable they continue to be.