So all of you who are telling me I'm being biased towards Apple agree with the comparisons made? You think that having an extra USB port and ethernet would be more important than OS X? I must say though, that the Optical Drive being in the Thinkpad boosts it's rating up, but it should be a 4 for both of them, considering the Thinkpad runs Vista, and the Air runs OS X. And for the guy that said I am propelling everything Apple to the top, just because its made by Apple is simply not true. I hate Apple's mistakes (Apple TV 1.0, iPod Classic, 20 dollar app fee for touch, Crappy Webapps, etc.), and shout out against them when I have the chance. However, when they do stuff right, such as the Air or especially the iPhone, it really peeves me when sites like CNET rate the Glimmer and Voyager higher than the iPhone. To them having Mac OS X is of the same importance as not having MMS, when it simply isn't. I hate not having MMS, but having Mac OS X outweighs this my a long shot. Again, the Macbook Air having OS X is of the same importance as not having a media card slot. What good is the media card slot if the OS is crap? What good is the extra USB port if Vista won't recognize the peripherals? What good is the DVD burner if you can't make something worth burning? This is the type of thing that gets overlooked on CNET, and must be stopped.