Yes, I understood that. My comment was off topic for this particular discussion.I totally agree that a newer system can be significantly faster on browsing the web. Even just a different browser can make 100% speed improvement. However, what I want to point out was the significant browsing speed increment should not be coming from the RAM running at high clock speed.
Modern web browsing requires a lot of CPU power. Much more than it used to. Not only does Flash require higher resources but things such as Java Script do as well.TBH, I also quite surprise that the software company keep comparing their browser's performance. For me, the internet content should be very "light weight" for modern computer. So, hardly can be a benchmark, but it seems I am totally wrong. At least some internet content like Flash can be very heavy weight.
I've been using the Internet for over 20 years. I can recall using systems with a 25MHz clock rate on the web with dial up modems. Surprisingly the browsing experience of today, with broadband Internet connectivity, processor speed measured in gigahertz, memory in the gigabytes, disk space in the terabytes, doesn't feel that much faster. All too often I find myself waiting for pages to load. Of course the content is much richer than the early days.I am no where near any expert in this area. I doubt if a G5 really cannot browse the web with proper speed (in terms of hardware). However, due to lack of software update, the old browser (software) actually cause more problem than the hardware. Because the old browser may not able to decode the new stuff correctly and effectively (even though hardware resource is not an issue).
I'm surprised a 1.8GHz system can struggle to browse a modern web page. I am using a current browser. If you're unfamiliar with Ten Four Fox I recommend you look into it. I have no trouble viewing modern web pages. It's the performance, or lack of, that is a result of all the active content on a typical website these days. Disabling Java Script greatly improves performance but at a cost of compatibility. It's just sad that such a system can struggle on a modern web page when it was blazing fast for its day.
Nothing special was added. I think it was just their marketing trying to show how fast their processor is for the web. I think this was around the Pentium III days so I can't be for certain.And it's new to me that Intel actually put something in the CPU to improve internet experience. Thanks for teach me something today. Do you have any idea what's that? A hardware decoder?