Thanks for the compliments.
The name was derived from the old Apple numbering era, of course Apple probably doesn't want to go into that scheme nowadays, but I was just having a play with this logical progression with the name. I couldn't come up with a name myself anyways (I did suggest eMac before), others probably include Mac slim, Mac core... along those lines, but most importantly though is not the name, but the concept.
I'm not so sure about the performances of those slim laptop drives though, is it a big compromise to use 2.5" and slimline disc drives other than 3.5" and standard drives? Should it be an industry standard to move to smaller drives but offer the same performance? I hope it does.