I haven't had a chance to try out the new version yet, but just glancing over the new features, I'm very happy to see an adjustment for correcting chromatic aberration at long last! I know LR has had that forever, and it was a glaring omission in Aperture.
Just a guess, but if you had already done faces in iPhoto before it probably stores those profiles somewhere and remembered them. Aperture on the other hand has to learn and make new profiles, which takes a while.Ok then why does it not work like it does in iphoto 09? Just for kicks I imported a folder into both (clean libraries) which had a ton of pictures of my kids.
iPhoto found the right kid and grouped them.. Aperture didn't.. as a matter of fact even after i labeled my son and daughter and scanned again it still couldn't match them.. bear in mind that some of the pictures were sequences...
Oh and it has nothing to do with elitism. I just separate my libraries iphoto for the snaps, aperture for seriousness...
Not trying to start a flamewar so lets jump over this already..
//F
If it has a bunch of good new features that you like but one that you don't have to use if you don't want to, what's the big deal? I've been reading a lot of grumbling about Faces in Aperture 3. Who cares? Don't use it if you don't like it.
I think the real reason behind the grumbling is elitism: those who fashion themselves as serious photographers don't want anything associated with the common riffraff picture snappers.
Give me a break.
Hmm, I see lots of cool things in Aperture 3 (using it) but I now face a problem. My 2GB of RAM is like not enough and I kept seeing the processing icon and fullscreen performance is near unusable. Anyone has similar problems?
Ooooh, me like! (Along with CA adjustment).Focus point display
Font size is the reason my next MBP will be the 15" model (matte), as the fonts on the 17" are too tiny.I'm just glad that all the fonts are easier to see. I have no problems with my eyesight, just I thought they were too small. Seems this version is taking advantage of all those large screens Apple is selling now.
While Aperture can handle [supposedly] an infinite amount of images in the Library, there are times when it is helpful to have two separate Libraries.
1. Personal/Professional (wedding or news photographers, etc.)
2. Multiple users on same computer
3. Photos vs. Videos
4. Archives
5. General speed for very large libraries or those with very large RAW files.
Don't forget the ability to dump a library on another machine and carry all of the previews, images, metadata, etc with you without having to reimport them.
Exporting projects in AP2 was decent, but Lightroom's catalogs were a dream, now AP3 takes it a step further.
Hmm, so it means now I can create 2 Aperture library (1 for work and the other for personal) and have both in my machine at the same time? Kinda cool actually, I think this will solve those performance issues that some user have when their library is full of RAW images right?
DS - are you going to be using LR or Ap3 going forward?
Has anyone checked if the Nik Software plug-ins for Aperture still work with v.3?
I was wondering the same thing and looking around to make sure most plug-ins worked with Aperture 3 before I take the plunge since there are a few I will be buying real soon.Has anyone checked if the Nik Software plug-ins for Aperture still work with v.3?
Has anyone checked if the Nik Software plug-ins for Aperture still work with v.3?
I was wondering the same thing and looking around to make sure most plug-ins worked with Aperture 3 before I take the plunge since there are a few I will be buying real soon.