Good call man.
I don't think the i5 is worth the money from an i3. I wholeheartedly believe it's a decision between i3 and i7. If the i3 won't cut it, don't even look at the i5.
spot on
Good call man.
I don't think the i5 is worth the money from an i3. I wholeheartedly believe it's a decision between i3 and i7. If the i3 won't cut it, don't even look at the i5.
Good call man.
I don't think the i5 is worth the money from an i3. I wholeheartedly believe it's a decision between i3 and i7. If the i3 won't cut it, don't even look at the i5.
Neither, i7 is the lowest anyone should buy.
Ever get the feeling people treat this place with a need to instantly express whatever deluded opinion pops into their head? Most of the world would suffice with a Pentium 4, it's called marketing and you've bought a front row seat.
To the OP, I'd personally suggest buying the cheapest Mac you can, besides a few (or several) minutes here or there on handbrake encoding times any Mac sold in the last 4 or 5 years can handle the tasks you describe. Obviously you want the iMac for the 27" screen, which is fine but go for the cheapest option.
I do everything you just described and more on the baseline MacBook Air with 4GB RAM, with half my RAM being used by Server 2008 in a virtual machine. Absolutely no slow downs, not one, nada, zilch.
If you can't afford i7, go with i5.
If you can't afford the i5, get a macbook air instead.
Neither, i7 is the lowest anyone should buy.