Corpse Bride - FCP

[devilot]

For me it would be revolutionary these days if they managed to produce a good film - so is it any good?

I enjoyed it... feels pretty predictable but I love the Corpse Bride character. And as a previous poster mentioned, I really enjoy stop-motion animation, so I loved Nightmare Before Christmas and the Wallace and Gromit shorts/movies and can't wait for the 'Were-Rabbit.'

 

[eva01]

I enjoyed it... feels pretty predictable but I love the Corpse Bride character. And as a previous poster mentioned, I really enjoy stop-motion animation, so I loved Nightmare Before Christmas and the Wallace and Gromit shorts/movies and can't wait for the 'Were-Rabbit.'

I am going to see "were-rabbit" too ^^, i liked Corpse Bride as well.

 

[mcarnes]

Got to take the side that there is nothing revolutionary about this, except the fact that the gear used to make it can be bought by anyone on Amazon or B&H.

That is very cool, but not revolutionary. The 128K Mac and the first iPod were revolutionary.

 

[LethalWolfe]

Got to take the side that there is nothing revolutionary about this, except the fact that the gear used to make it can be bought by anyone on Amazon or B&H.

So, you don't think anything was revolutionary except for the part that was revolutionary? I think I know what you meant, you just worded it poorly.

I guess how much "revolution" you see in the making of "Corpse Bride" depends on how much you care about, or know about, the process of movie making.

That is very cool, but not revolutionary. The 128K Mac and the first iPod were revolutionary.

The iPod was, and is, an unparalleled execution of an existing product. It was very cool, but not revolutionary. What Apple has done w/the iPod+iTMS could be seen as revolutionary. The Newton was revolutionary as well as ahead of it's time.

Lethal

 

[Abstract]

The only thing revolutionary is the price. Actually, it's more "evolutionary" than anything else.

As a viewer, I won't find this revolutionary or evolutionary. It's only evolutionary for editing and filmmaking. While that's important for a small, small part of the population, most of us don't care HOW it's made as long as it looks good. But again, we won't be able to tell by watching.

 

[iDM]

*snore* This thread is boring.

Can we argue about something else.

Seconded

I can't stand when people start arguing over miniscule details of definitions, which inevitable turns in to defining every word of the definition, which inevitably wastes everyones time, wait why am i still typing and wasting my time, damn i have fallen victim

 

[LethalWolfe]

The only thing revolutionary is the price. Actually, it's more "evolutionary" than anything else.

As a viewer, I won't find this revolutionary or evolutionary. It's only evolutionary for editing and filmmaking. While that's important for a small, small part of the population, most of us don't care HOW it's made as long as it looks good. But again, we won't be able to tell by watching.

The move to digital is revolutionizing all aspects of the entertainment industry. The process of filmmaking has changed more in the past 10 years than it has in the past 100 years. Whether or not laymen notice doesn't change the significance of what's going on.

Like I said before, people who know about post/production will see the significance. Those who don't won't.


Lethal

 

[decksnap]

The move to digital is revolutionizing all aspects of the entertainment industry. The process of filmmaking has changed more in the past 10 years than it has in the past 100 years. Whether or not laymen notice doesn't change the significance of what's going on.

Like I said before, people who know about post/production will see the significance. Those who don't won't.


Lethal

Agreed. Perhaps not revolutionary to some of these posters, but revolutionary none the less.