Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Okay, you seem sincere in wanting feedback. It's a little hard for me to critique a photo that was taken over 20 years ago. Typically people looking for CC are looking to improve a specific image, and with this particular image you certainly aren't going to have the chance to redo it. However, should you find yourself in the midst of dog photography again, you might want to recreate something similar with a different dog.

For me personally, this image misses the mark. The flash wasn't quite strong enough to freeze motion, so the whole thing comes off as a little smudgy. I think this would have worked better with a larger flash unit, as I suspect this was taken with on-board flash. (TBH, though, on board flash is making a very retro comeback, so maybe that's okay here.)

The string breaks up the frame, as well as the resulting shadow, and not being a dog sport/competition person, I don't really know why that string is there in the first place.

I do like the composition, in that you kept all of the dog in the frame - no small limb chops, which people frequently do. I probably would clone or crop out that very little bit at the top of the frame which isn't the grass - it draws my eye away from the dog.

You mentioned you'd like to print this. I would probably sharpen it slightly to offset some of the blur, but definitely don't go overboard as you'll then just make it look like you tried to get rid of the blur - you won't be able to do that well.



Planting 2022 (sorry about the signature)
View attachment 2463334

This image is much more interesting overall; I suspect your dog image has sentimental value that isn't translated to a viewer, but nonetheless important for you.

This image has a good composition; I might extend the canvas at the top slightly to move the horizon line to the bottom third line, but it's not egregious where it is. I would definitely back away from the strong vignette - it isn't even centered on the image, and it just kind of closes the image in, IMO. I'd also be inclined to brush a bit of exposure back on the wheels of the tractors, just to open up the detail there with the harsh sun coming down.

This image seems to have a weird artifact on it, not sure if you over sharpened or added grain, but it's really noticeable in the sky and detracts from the image overall, I think. I also shoot film and don't inherently mind grain, but this comes across as splotchy, not fine grain like film would be.

The lighting here is a strong, hard light, and you used it well to help tell your story. I think with the few editing tweaks I mentioned you can have a much more dynamic final result.
 
Thank you Mollyc.
I am if nothing else always sincere :).
"Onboard flash"? do you mean built in/popup. My flash at the time would have been a Canon 420 (gn 42) and this snap was taken whilst in a bit of a jostling match with other pro.togs besides the CRUFTs main ring other flashes synched with mine (visa versa) to cause the odd lighting. You're right about the personal significance. Agree about the string (used to pull a lure for the terrier to chase) and Affinity should sort that. Your other points (good to have back up). Do you think just local sharpening (face & feet) just for the print?
I rather like destorted editing but will redo this with your advice in mind. I had in mind a 'pinhole' affect and heavy grain when I took the shot - so - not right and thanks again.
 
Thank you Mollyc.
I am if nothing else always sincere :).
"Onboard flash"? do you mean built in/popup. My flash at the time would have been a Canon 420 (gn 42) and this snap was taken whilst in a bit of a jostling match with other pro.togs besides the CRUFTs main ring other flashes synched with mine (visa versa) to cause the odd lighting. You're right about the personal significance. Agree about the string (used to pull a lure for the terrier to chase) and Affinity should sort that. Your other points (good to have back up). Do you think just local sharpening (face & feet) just for the print?
I rather like destorted editing but will redo this with your advice in mind. I had in mind a 'pinhole' affect and heavy grain when I took the shot - so - not right and thanks again.

I mean, honestly, if the image is that emotionally signficant, I would make just basic edits and get it printed. 🙂 I have plenty of family images that aren't that great on a technical basis, but are still worth me printing and loving, regardless of what others think. Just get it to a spot that enhances the mood for you, and send it off!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reality4711
I don't generally attempt much in low light, nor do I generally consider B&W reproduction, but I wanted to test the limits of newly acquired s/h iPhone 15pro. I'd welcome critique here as both seemed to have been crowd pleasers.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3281.jpeg
    IMG_3281.jpeg
    575.3 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_3281.jpeg
    IMG_3281.jpeg
    655 KB · Views: 11
I don't generally attempt much in low light, nor do I generally consider B&W reproduction, but I wanted to test the limits of newly acquired s/h iPhone 15pro. I'd welcome critique here as both seemed to have been crowd pleasers.
I prefer the color one for this batch. Black and white doesn't do too much in differentiating color tones and I feel that the sign stands out better in color - it's the standout object against a neutral background, essentially. I want to go in this pub :D . I do like how the composition draws the viewer towards the inviting (to me) pub. For me, I'd prefer a bit of work on keystoning to do a little straightening and perspective shifting, just ever so slightly. Not to de-wonk (not really a word ) any wonky leaning walls per se but just to tweak what the iPhone lens does to perspective. A little stretching, a little vertical nudging. The other thing I did - maybe controversial (!) - is to remove the branch in the upper left. I felt that it was distracting the lead-in to the pub. Obviously, literally everything I say is my own personal approach. :)

IMG_3281_ 2--.jpg


My take, if interested....
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.