Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
DAC recommendations for new AppleTV?
- Thread starter rawdawg
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Awesome. Just what I was looking for.
That means I don't need a DAD, just a DAC.
Any good recommendations for a DAC ~$100-200? The list provided earlier in this thread is rather... incomplete for lower tiered pricing, and seems to focus on internal cards.
If not a DAC, maybe a receiver with a built in DAC thats pretty cheap?
Any suggestions?
I think for $400, the DACMagic is the way to go. If that is out of your range, you may want to consider holding off on the DAC until you can justify it.
Just my opinion.
Just my opinion.
Good lord, there are lots of reasons to spend in that price range, and the DAC Magic is reportedly a very nice unit (though varying opinions about it versus the others I mentioned in the price range).
But if your goal is to get decent sound (i.e. better than a laptop), then the DAC707 I posted earlier should suffice.
Some interesting reading material:
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/259973/the-new-dac-super-pro-dac707-usb#post_3477159
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=66019&st=0&p=589443&#entry589443
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=66008&hl=
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=66019&st=0&p=589443&#entry589443
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=66008&hl=
That said, I have not done much research of the lower end stand alone DACs.
Dan
Here's another one to look at:
The Beresford TC-7510 Mk6 (or later) http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread...10-bashing-and-headfi-bashing/15#post_3406166
Consider as good for the money, but not a "giant killer". Seller noted to be a shill on forums.
The question I have now would be if it would be better to just get a cheap receiver?
Assuming that the ATV (and my computer) will do the DD decode, so I don't need a DAD, that means all I really need is a DAC. However since I'd really like multi-inputs, wouldn't it be wiser to just get a receiver with built-in DAC? I mean don't most come with DAC's nowadays? It's not like their DAC is going to be any worse than the cheaper standalone ones, and since I'm just going to 2.1 wouldn't a receiver be a better choice? I might need an amp, of course, but if I could get away with not getting one that too would be nice.
Any recommendations? Again, price is a concern here, I'd definitely say cheaper is better.
Assuming that the ATV (and my computer) will do the DD decode, so I don't need a DAD, that means all I really need is a DAC. However since I'd really like multi-inputs, wouldn't it be wiser to just get a receiver with built-in DAC? I mean don't most come with DAC's nowadays? It's not like their DAC is going to be any worse than the cheaper standalone ones, and since I'm just going to 2.1 wouldn't a receiver be a better choice? I might need an amp, of course, but if I could get away with not getting one that too would be nice.
Any recommendations? Again, price is a concern here, I'd definitely say cheaper is better.
If you want 5.1 sound from streaming that includes it, you will need a receiver that can decode the sound and send it to the correct speakers. Of course, you need a multi-channel receiver anyway if you intend to actually listen to 5.1 sound with at least 6 speakers. So a stereo receiver won't really be much help there. I'm sure there are some other options, but this is the standard way to listen to multi-channeled theater sound. You don't have to spend that much for a good A-V receiver, but that is really your best option to hear everything the director intended coming out of each speaker.
I would hazard a guess that almost any of the $100+ DACs will provide better sound than the DAC in an inexpensive receiver, but if you're not that excited by your current amp, and your priorities are heavily weighed towards price over sound quality, then an integrated receiver is definitely the way to go. The newer receivers have come a long way in getting decent sound for modest prices. Especially take a good hard look at last year's models (for example a Denon 2310ci can be had for about $500 and has an awful lot going for it, or even the AVR1910 should be pretty good at about $370), and try not to succumb to feature greed - do you really need 3d and height channels from this year's models?
“If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will." - Yoda
I'm pretty sure Yoda was talking about the dark path of HI-FI. Get what you can afford and be happy. Do not study the ways of the audiophile.
Dan
The thing is; I'm not going to be listening in 5.1. Since the ATV doesn't have an analog out, I have to go optical. I might as well continue that for my computer, since its built in DAD/C is homebrew intel. Therefore since I have a 2.1 system, and since I'm going optical out of the ATV, I need a DAC. At that point though I might as well get a receiver, stereo or otherwise, since these usually include a DAC. I realize there's a difference between multi-channel and stereo receivers; that's why I'd like something that's flexible. That is, it'll take my 2.1 system now and anything larger I throw at it later. This would typically mean a multichannel receiver, but I'm not well versed in receivers, which is why I'm asking here
I've heard good things about that one as well. It's even got balanced output via XLR, which is quite the high-end feature usually found in much more expensive media players. Of course you probably have no need nor input options for XLR connectors?
The thing is; I'm not going to be listening in 5.1. Since the ATV doesn't have an analog out, I have to go optical. I might as well continue that for my computer, since its built in DAD/C is homebrew intel. Therefore since I have a 2.1 system, and since I'm going optical out of the ATV, I need a DAC. At that point though I might as well get a receiver, stereo or otherwise, since these usually include a DAC. I realize there's a difference between multi-channel and stereo receivers; that's why I'd like something that's flexible. That is, it'll take my 2.1 system now and anything larger I throw at it later. This would typically mean a multichannel receiver, but I'm not well versed in receivers, which is why I'm asking here
I've been spending a lot of time with audio-video gear of late as I am upgrading pretty much everything I have. There are some good A-V receivers that are not too expensive. Personally, I usually get most things from Amazon--my recommendations are Onkyo, Denon, and Yamaha. I really haven't looked into any options other than A-V receivers but of course others here have options that may work better for you. Any multi-channel A-V receiver can work just fine in stereo 2-channel mode. I use that mode often for music.
There are plenty of options--this is a pretty good deal here:
http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-RX-V66...ef=sr_1_4?s=aht&ie=UTF8&qid=1285782372&sr=1-4
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Another vote for the DAC Super Pro 707 - I've had one hooked up to my Airport Express for the past couple of years, and it sounds far better than the analog output. I'm not enough of an audiophile to have looked at the more expensive options.
Another (somewhat unconventional) approach to this would be to look for a used MiniDisc deck with digital inputs. That should be pretty inexpensive and many (most?) of them have an option to act as a simple DA converter.
Anyway, that's how I'm doing it with my Airport Express, and it works and sounds great.
Anyway, that's how I'm doing it with my Airport Express, and it works and sounds great.