Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Do you like using non apple browsers on the Mac?
- Thread starter jwolf6589
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Firefox and Brave is better for your privacy since they are open source. You never know what is apple collecting behind closed doors.
whats special about Orion that Safari does not have?
Brave is basically Chrome without Google trackers, Edge is also based on Chromium , so website rendering should be similar on all 3.
I have been using Firefox since it was Firebird for a little bit more than 20 years. I think what made me stick with it was I was using both a wintel and mac system and it just worked well with regards to matching settings, bookmarks... on both machines. Safari on windows never connected with me. When I was able to move to solely a macos machine, I just seemed like a seamless move. Do I use FF on my ios/pados devices? Nope, there Safari just seems natural.
Random tip for Firefox users, there's a modification you can install for the window's top chrome to make the background of the tab bar translucent with the macOS vibrancy effect. I find it really makes Firefox look instantly more Mac-like (although the most recent UI overhaul fits in much better with the Mac aesthetic post-Big Sur regardless).
Not sure if MacRumors policy allows me to post links but Google zvuc firefox macOS native tabbar and you can find the github page with the files you need to add to Firefox's profile folder.
Not sure if MacRumors policy allows me to post links but Google zvuc firefox macOS native tabbar and you can find the github page with the files you need to add to Firefox's profile folder.
There are a host of features that will be more or less important to different people:
-Orion runs on older platforms (back to Mojave) but includes the latest WebKit -- as many websites are breaking on the last Safari that came with Mojave (and perhaps soon Catalina), this means those systems can still access the web with a WebKit-based browser.
-Supports multiple profiles which Safari only offered with V.17 (which requires Monterey or later). Similarly for vertical tabs.
-0 telemetry
-Builtin content blocker
-Supports both 3rd-party Chrome and Firefox extensions (including uBlock Origin, etc in case you prefer that over the builtin content blocker)
-Nice touches like a menu item for 'Open Page in Internet Archive' and 'Allow Copy & Paste'
Further overview (though new features added since):
Orion browser features | Kagi Blog
Orion ( https://browser.kagi.com ) may be a newcomer to the market, but it comes loaded with features.
blog.kagi.com
New features in the Orion Browser | Kagi Blog
*Orion beta 0.99.124* has just landed ( https://browser.kagi.com/#download_sec ) and is bringing over 160 new features, improvements, and bug fixes, making this our most significant release ever.
blog.kagi.com
It's not all roses. It's been in beta for a long time. Between beta releases there are frequent release candidates (similar I think to Safari Technology Previews) which have issues.
Still the author seems to have a certain dedication to quality. I sense he won't make an official 1.0 release until it meets a quality/complete goal that seems more like other software's 3.1.1 releases. And he even seems careful in his beta not to go backwards. Such things that used to be tablestakes but these days it's kind of nice...
For security reasons, if I have any doubts, I've started using the DuckDuckGo browser. Any opinions on it?
I like DuckDuckGo as a company. They seem open and transparent. I use their browser on my phone.
However, I recall trying an old pre-beta version of their browser on my Mac and it wasn't usable for me. I am sure better now but never tried again. I do notice two things 1) they only use the OS's web engine via WebView and 2) they only support Big Sur+.
1. One hand it doesn't seem necessary for every company to invest in or maintain their own web engine so I see the logic in this.
On the other hand, this also means that you're limited to the version and features of the web engine that last came with your OS. For example, it would seem that runnning DuckDuckGo on Big Sur would mean you're limited to a WebKit with known security risks that Apple will not be addressing. Later this year that will probably become true for those who want to remain on Monterey.
It also means that websites may differ between Windows (where it uses Blink) and Mac (where it uses WebKit).
Finally it appears they can't workaround all the limitations of some OS's web engine to implement all their privacy protections.
2. In the context of 1) this makes sense as the WebKit included in Mojave and Catalina are out-of-date and have known security risks that Apple won't be fixing. On the other hand, it's inconsistent to still support Big Sur by that logic.
In any case, while I don't relish switching browsers constantly, I also haven't found any one browser covers everything. Test driving Orion as my primary right now while Firefox is my backup.
Speaking of, Firefox's performance isn't bad these days. On my Intel MacBook Air, V.123 all extensions disabled has the fastest Speedometer 3.0 results of any browser so far. Then I believe the combination of NoScript and uBlock Origin provides good privacy though they also seem to slow it down pretty good (at least 1/3rd for me). I am sure the privacy/security protections of that combination still isn't perfect but overall it seems a reasonable compromise of the available options.
Brave looks to be another interesting option but trying to see if the Orion+Firefox combination covers me before bringing in a 3rd.
FYI, I was thinking about trying Edge but not after seeing this (note the original data and analysis sourced from Brave):
I know the developer, he actually build the browser for himself and hence why you notice the quality. They actually have a long term plan to make Kagi a "suite" with different services like search, email, browser..etc.
No reason. Firefox and Brave are just as secure or better and FOSS. I dont think DDG is FOSS.
i use firefox on Mac, I see zero difference between it, safari, and brave in terms of speed or web rendering. The difference lies in the features. FF/Brave are multiplatform , FOSS, has extensions. It also good to support the smaller guys to decentralize the internet instead of letting the tech corps rule the internet. The less users they see, the less they likely to continue their efforts.
Yup! My university does not recommend safari. Chrome and Firefox were the recommended ones because the sites they use don’t work well with Safari
I use Firefox for certain sites that have heavy ads, and Firefox plugins for ad blocking work much better than Safari's limited capabilities. I use Safari for most of my browsing because I like staying "in the ecosystem" and keychain passwords and autofill, TouchID logins, etc. all are more efficient.
Although I dislike Safari, it generally works similar to chrome for our sites (and the edit mode for them).
I personally use Firefox but also have chrome and Edge installed for testing purposes and also windows in case testing is needed there.
FF ad blocking is good.
Yes - I do.
For things that are too much a nuisance to get working within Firefox with an ad blocker.
For things when I want to use Apple Pay, or Hide My Email.
For a site I use with two different logins. Easier to use one in Firefox and the other in Safari.
For things which for no known reason don't work in Firefox and I can't be bothered to try to work out why.
There might well be ways of doing all these without resorting to Safari, but it is always there and it works.
