expensive? Surely you jest. Compare like builds to like performance, the M1 Pro and Max Macs are very price competitive. Sure if you don't want the displays and build quality, you can get by with cheaper. I compared to Dell XPS (which throttle heavily under load, and have short battery life), By the time you got to an equivalent performance level and screen (not brighter - can't do it), you were forking out some serious bucks. I also compared to some serious gaming rigs (which are uber expensive), but as Macs are not usually gamers preferred choices - hard to compare graphics performance, and the display refresh rates were uselessly (to me) faster at the expense of other display specs. So, not seeing the expensive moniker be earned (get it?).No... They ran a performance benchmark comparison between the m1 MacBook Pro & the previous generation top-tier i7 MacBook Pro with Nvidia graphics and the M1 MacBook not only had higher performance and better graphics than the previous model, it also did so without really getting hot at all. The M1 processor is ridiculously powerful and efficient.. and thus expensive.
But I am nothing if not willing to be disproved by facts - send links