It's like the jump from the S4 to the S4 Pro.
http://androidcommunity.com/qualcom...-core-benchmarks-this-thing-is-fast-20130618/
It's like the jump from the S4 to the S4 Pro.
Apart from a few geeks here does anyone really care if their S4 or iPhone is slower on certain tasks? Most of this stuff wouldn't even generate a conversation over a pub table.I do love the misleading info you present. It is true that Apple does very well on low level commands and cpu cycles, but that isnt helpful when you are doing work that requires multiple cores and a high freq rate.
Additionally, Low level geometry and fill rate metrics are dominated by Imagination Technologies (gl benchmark fyi) . If we look at the simulated game benchmarks though, Apple falls flat on its face.
Apart from a few geeks here does anyone really care if their S4 or iPhone is slower on certain tasks? Most of this stuff wouldn't even generate a conversation over a pub table.
I think I must be haha. I'd probably get introduced to a pool cue down my local if I attempted it.You're drinking in the wrong pubs.
No it won't. It will roll out in Korea and make its way to US by end of Q3. That's like saying intel is going to release a new processor and you can't buy it unless you live in the US. No such thing. It's just a variant
By your logic, NOBODY should get the new laptops with the Haswell CPUs because everyone knows these chips are the "tock" of Intel's developmental cycle and the next "tick" processors will blow these current ones out of the water!!
Citation needed.
The last word that this was a South Korean launch and the CEO was in talks with other carriers in other countries but it was never stated the US nor it's carriers were one of them. You are operating on a large guess at this point.
I do love the misleading info you present. It is true that Apple does very well on low level commands and cpu cycles, but that isnt helpful when you are doing work that requires multiple cores and a high freq rate.
Additionally, Low level geometry and fill rate metrics are dominated by Imagination Technologies (gl benchmark fyi) . If we look at the simulated game benchmarks though, Apple falls flat on its face.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Basemark X is a new addition to our mobile GPU benchmark suite. There are no low level tests here, just some game simulation tests run at both onscreen (device resolution) and offscreen (1080p, no vsync) settings. The scene complexity is far closer to GLBenchmark 2.7 than the new 3DMark Ice Storm benchmark, so frame rates are pretty low:
Image
Image
Image
Yeah im looking forward to these chips. Finally Android will have the CPU power to match with the great phones available. The current duel core Apple cpu is faster then the current quadcore android cpu's but the 800 will soon change that
You mean cherry pick your results, and posts tests where the iPhone isn't even featured...
Umm, the snapdragon 600, snapdragon s4 pro, exynos 5250, and tons of other existing cpus already are faster than the a6.
Apart from a few geeks here does anyone really care if their S4 or iPhone is slower on certain tasks? Most of this stuff wouldn't even generate a conversation over a pub table.
In straight benchmarking yes, but in actual use the A6 is quicker. I will have to dig up the article. Don't get me wrong i own a Nexus 4 and love it and would not go back to an iPhone if Apple payed me.
You mean cherry pick your results, and posts tests where the iPhone isn't even featured...
If I cherry picked, why would I post results where Apple wwonder s? That makes no sense, unless you are so blinded you refuse to believe anything is actually better than Apple? And you wonder why Apple has a reputation of having a cult following?
oplix17458512 said:[qoute] Also you can avoid reality all you want saying that there's no point waiting but I can tell you one of the main disadvantages of android at the moment is long charge times. Snapdragon 800 charges phones 75% faster than snapdragon 600
Quad, Octa, Decacores... they sound cool eh? it's a cellular phone after all meant to make/recieve calls, browse the web and download apps... what tasks require 'SnapDragon', now and soon enough we might hear Spinosaurus, tyrannosaurus rex etc you get the picture ... if you need such a heavy duty mobile device shouldn't you look for a tablet and if you are serious gamer head over to alienware .. I just want a good looking mobile device that runs smooth, gives good battery life , ability to download apps and well built
Umm, the snapdragon 600, snapdragon s4 pro, exynos 5250, and tons of other existing cpus already are faster than the a6.
And while on paper this might be true, my S4 still experienced lag out of the box that my iPhone NEVER experienced. As an Android user for the past year having owned several high end Android devices. I've come to realize that there's just no optimization with hardware, and software on Android like there is with the iPhone. Sure the trade off with the iPhone is that the screen might not be MASSIVE, but at least it "just works", and gets the job done without stutter.
If you weren't cherry picking you would have posted the source rather than linking images, some of which aren't even relevant to the iPhone.
For those that like to read: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7082/...-preview-qualcomm-mobile-development-tablet/2
The downer is this is only a reference design, not an actual product, so take the results with a grain of salt.
S4 "out of the box" is not using pure Android, but that bloated crap UI Samsung uses, and that is why there is lag. Has little to do with Android and almost all to do with the Touchwiz UI. The iPhone comes with pure iOS, so not fair to really compare the two.
I have my S3 running Task650's ROM and it is just a pure joy to use, with no lag and no stutter and very, very fast. But that is what happens when you have an optimized UI. I hated using Touchwiz, but thankfully Android has such a large developer community to create ROMs and Kernels for specific devices on specific carriers.
With the "Nexus" version of the S4 being released tomorrow, or buying the S4 Active (also running pure Android) it will be more akin to an experience like iOS, on an iPhone, "out of the box". (Although every iDevice I have ever owned has had lag and stutter of some degree.)
I own a Nexus 4, but without LTE it just isn't an option for me. The S3 has been tolerable, but am looking to go back to the iPhone in the fall unless the Note 3 can blow me away. Also, I'm pretty sure the Activ has Touchwiz. I was considering the Google Edition S4, but decided to hold off to see what the Note 3, and the iPhone 5S brings.