I am hoping the people who have been doing these reviews just have giant hands. Coming from both a Sidekick 3 and an 8125 [yes two providers] it will be tough to not have easy input.
The "hard presses" comment makes me discredit this post. From what I understand, it's not actually a pressure sensitive screen, but is capacitance based. Therefore, pressure should be irrelevant. Certainly the demo videos seem to use very light touches. Nothing in this post offers anything new that would suggest that it's actually true
Source : Ishir Bhan - Comment
That article has some good responses. One I like best talks about the fact that there's been touch screen keyboards on mobile devices for at least ten years. There's a good reason why the rest of the world has moved to hardware keyboards.
He's wrong. I've used capacitive screens that seem to need a "hard press".
There's a good reason why the rest of the world has moved to hardware keyboards.
...Hardware keyboards add improved accuracy and speed at the cost of bulk or reduced screen size. There's no perfect system.
Which devices are you referring to that have a capacitive screen?
Hardware keyboards add improved accuracy and speed at the cost of bulk or reduced screen size. There's no perfect system.
For text-inputting the iPhone screen isn't much if any larger than other smart phones with hardware keyboards. The only real advantage the iPhone has for text input is the changeable button layout for different applications, and I think for text input this will be of limited use..
Don't forget the major point that Steve made in the original keynote. The reason hardware keypads aren't great is because they can't be changed. Once they start getting feedback, it is as easy as a firmware update to alter the size and style of the keypad. It could be changed to work in landscape mode for a larger size or changed completely.
Really?
Engadget's one of the best technology blogs out th.... oh wait, you must be a fanboy, and they once said something bad about stevie & company. Take off the rose-colored glasses, not everyone marches in lock step with apple.
I kind of disagree and agree. For general technology, Engadget is fine. Engadget knows though that Apple stories garner their biggest interest and page views and thus the most money. Couple that with Ryan Blocks general dislike of most Apple products (hey, thats his opinion...not hating on that) and you get a general slant that is negative in my opinion.
I can almost guarantee his iPhone review will focus disproportionately on the smaller, niggly points to taint the article.
* The touchscreen was said to, in general, require somewhat hard presses to register input, and needs some getting used to.
Not that this says anything worth getting riled up about, but I actually had this impression too. Three somewhat suspicious things to note:The "hard presses" comment makes me discredit this post. From what I understand, it's not actually a pressure sensitive screen, but is capacitance based. Therefore, pressure should be irrelevant. Certainly the demo videos seem to use very light touches. Nothing in this post offers anything new that would suggest that it's actually true
Source : Ishir Bhan - Comment
But most touch-screen phones that shipped last year, including Palm's Treo and Motorola's ROKR E6, used "resistive touch" technology — the most common technology, said Jennifer Colegrove, a senior analyst of display technologies at iSuppli. It has two layers of glass or plastic and calculates the location of touch when pressure is applied with either a stylus or a finger.
A more advanced type of touch screen, featured on the iPhone and LG Prada, uses "projected capacitive" technology. A mesh of metal wires between two layers of glass registers a touch when the electrical field is broken.
That's why light finger brushes will do the trick. But capacitive sensors don't even need actual physical contact: such touch screens already detect the proximity of a finger from 2 millimeters away, Colegrove said.
Think "static electricity", and whether you need to press your finger HARDER to that unsuspecting vicitm, after moving about in your socks, or whether pressure isn't that relevant. Sometimes I hate watching the trouble makers out there. They usually prey on ignorance, with relatively good success.Another area in which the systems differ is in which stimuli will register as a touch event. A resistive system registers a touch as long as the two layers make contact, which means that it doesn't matter if you touch it with your finger or a rubber ball. A capacitive system, on the other hand, must have a conductive input, usually your finger, in order to register a touch.
there are three things about this post that makes me think it isnt real....
1) its negativity, nothing nice to say about the phone, its got to have something good to talk about
2) the hard pressed for the screen (which was discussed earlier)
3) magsafe power adapter for the bt headset??? that makes no sense, magsafe was made so when someone trips on the cord it doesnt yank the electronic with it.. a bt headset doesnt have enough weight to detach from the adapter.. it makes no sense at all...
Right. When everything is positive it's true.
LOL, Ryan Block is far from an Apple hater. Him and Veronica Belmont both own Macbook Pro's.