Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
Whatever could possibly have given you that impression? ;)

You seem very, err, even minded, a man of the world, well travelled, understanding, well read, educated. From my experience from when I studied for my degree most lecturers read the Guardian. Not that it matters of course. Just wondering. I myself read all three on occasion but subscribe to the Times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
One of the best way to enjoy coffee....
Moka.jpg

And even better :p
napoletana_6_tazze.jpg


When they say Coffee should be black, is because it is the only way to fully feel the aroma of it without the taste being compromised by whatever kind of sweetener you use.
A good kind of coffee is good both with and without sugar, a bad kind of coffee might taste better than it really is if sugar is added.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
One of the best way to enjoy coffee....
Moka.jpg

And even better :p
napoletana_6_tazze.jpg


When they say Coffee should be black, is because it is the only way to fully feel the aroma of it without the taste being compromised by whatever kind of sweetener you use.
A good kind of coffee is good both with and without sugar, a bad kind of coffee might taste better than it really is if sugar is added.

I have a Bialetti Somewhere in the back of the cupboard. I seem to remember you have to be careful not to let the brew bubble over too much. You need to keep an eye on it. My sister's Italian boyfriend says his family back in Italy swear by the Bialetti's.
 
You seem very, err, even minded, a man of the world, well travelled, understanding, well read, educated. From my experience from when I studied for my degree most lecturers read the Guardian. Not that it matters of course. Just wondering. I myself read all three on occasion but subscribe to the Times.

Thank you for your most kind words.

While, yes, I am a former lecturer (of history and politics), I am, also, as it happens, female. But no matter.

Anyway, I subscribe (paid subscriptions) to The Economist (print and online), and to Foreign Policy.

I also subscribe to the Eurasia Daily Monitor, Afghan Analysts Network, and used to subscribe to Moscow News (one of the few remaining independent publications in that unfortunate country), but these subscriptions have not required payment.

Yes, when I am at home, I do read the Guardian as a broadsheet paper - let us say that it would be my first port of call, and always read it online too, when abroad. However, the Observer would probably rank as my personal favourite. When home, I never miss buying it.

As I cannot abide Mr Murdoch, I will not touch The Times, but I do read the Telegraph; while I rarely agree with it, it tends to be very well written.

Sometimes, I will also look at The New Statesman and The Spectator.

Just now, enjoying a mug of freshly made coffee (the end of my Rwandan coffee).
[doublepost=1464348314][/doublepost]
One of the best way to enjoy coffee....
Moka.jpg

And even better :p
napoletana_6_tazze.jpg


When they say Coffee should be black, is because it is the only way to fully feel the aroma of it without the taste being compromised by whatever kind of sweetener you use.
A good kind of coffee is good both with and without sugar, a bad kind of coffee might taste better than it really is if sugar is added.

I have a Bialetti Somewhere in the back of the cupboard. I seem to remember you have to be careful not to let the brew bubble over too much. You need to keep an eye on it. My sister's Italian boyfriend says his family back in Italy swear by the Bialetti's.

I have a cherished, somewhat battered, Bialetti - a gift from my godmother who brought it back from Italy around two decades ago.

Re the Bialetti, @Medz1, if the heat source is not too high, it won't bubble over; now, just before the coffee is ready to be served, it makes a wonderful gurgling sound, - that is the last of the water rising from the base through the coffee to the top part of the pot. Bialettis look brilliant, are pretty much indestructible, and make a lovely cup of espresso style coffee.
 
I have a Bialetti Somewhere in the back of the cupboard. I seem to remember you have to be careful not to let the brew bubble over too much. You need to keep an eye on it. My sister's Italian boyfriend says his family back in Italy swear by the Bialetti's.
As soon as you hear the famous sound you have to remove it from the stove!
People tend to forgive the ingredients are important as well... and most forget that water is an ingredient as well...

When i was in US with my beloved Bialetti, and my italian Crema e Gusto (Lavazza) the taste was very different from the same combination here in Italy...and it was down to the water!
 
@Scepticalscribe. Funny how I presumed you were a man! My apologies.

Back home. This smells amazing!

View attachment 633183

Well, I write about - and am passionately interested in - and make my living from the study of - history and politics, and love books, (reading mostly factually based titles, though I do read fiction, as well), discuss - fleetingly - my travels, write with a Mont Blanc, love coffee, - read broadsheets, - so, I suppose some people do draw the conclusion that I am male.

(I could say that it is a little depressing, really, what this infers may be thought about the mental landscape that women can inhabit).

In the world of publishing, apparently, men, notoriously, rarely buy - or read - books written by women, whereas women buy - and read - books written by men and women.

I mentioned earlier that I used to be an academic, and taught history and politics; a history book I wrote sold pretty well, and my publishers were stupefied (and I have no idea of how they managed to acquire this information) to learn that my readership, seemingly, was overwhelmingly male. This broke the publishing 'rules' apparently.

Anyway, back on topic: This morning, I am drinking a new coffee - a blend of Ethiopian and Brazilian beans that I picked up from a small roaster a few days ago. Lovely and clean and bright, with some nice depth, too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AVBeatMan
In Lancashire eh? Is that anywhere near Blackburn?
(No holes I can see) :p
Nice town.
Nice nod to the Fab 4...
[doublepost=1464495988][/doublepost]
Well, I write about - and am passionately interested in - and make my living from the study of - history and politics, and love books, (reading mostly factually based titles, though I do read fiction, as well), discuss - fleetingly - my travels, write with a Mont Blanc, love coffee, - read broadsheets, - so, I suppose some people do draw the conclusion that I am male.

(I could say that it is a little depressing, really, what this infers may be thought about the mental landscape that women can inhabit).

In the world of publishing, apparently, men, notoriously, rarely buy - or read - books written by women, whereas women buy - and read - books written by men and women.

I mentioned earlier that I used to be an academic, and taught history and politics; a history book I wrote sold pretty well, and my publishers were stupefied (and I have no idea of how they managed to acquire this information) to learn that my readership, seemingly, was overwhelmingly male. This broke the publishing 'rules' apparently.

Anyway, back on topic: This morning, I am drinking a new coffee - a blend of Ethiopian and Brazilian beans that I picked up from a small roaster a few days ago. Lovely and clean and bright, with some nice depth, too.

You forgot to include your enjoyment of and appreciation for watches, which is another male-dominant hobby/past time. I too am guilty of inferring you were male - NOT because of anything you said or discussed - but simply because of the high proportion of males on here. Having said that, I had also been of the opinion (before knowing you were female) that you were clearly in touch with your "feminine side", as you would often go into much richer detail on how things looked, tasted, smelled, etc. then most men. In addition, you also seem to be very relationship-oriented, which is another more-typical feminine trait. When I finally discovered you were female (due to I think another discussion similar to this) I remember thinking "now it all makes sense!".

Sorry for over-analysis of something that really should not matter at all.
 
Nice nod to the Fab 4...
[doublepost=1464495988][/doublepost]

You forgot to include your enjoyment of and appreciation for watches, which is another male-dominant hobby/past time. I too am guilty of inferring you were male - NOT because of anything you said or discussed - but simply because of the high proportion of males on here. Having said that, I had also been of the opinion (before knowing you were female) that you were clearly in touch with your "feminine side", as you would often go into much richer detail on how things looked, tasted, smelled, etc. then most men. In addition, you also seem to be very relationship-oriented, which is another more-typical feminine trait. When I finally discovered you were female (due to I think another discussion similar to this) I remember thinking "now it all makes sense!".

Sorry for over-analysis of something that really should not matter at all.

To be honest, I am surprised that this should be something considered of relevance, or interest, to anyone.

Actually, - and this is ironical - and is even odder that men are so determined to try to put people into neat little boxes, and seek to try to define them thus, and feel unable to communicate unless the boxes are ticked. Candidly, most of the time, I am massively uninterested in people - I wish them well in a benignly indifferent manner, but have no real interest in interacting with the vast majority of them, except in a professional context; give me a book, instead.

Re relationships, it is just that on this site, some completely clueless individuals need to have things explained to them in language that might get through to their thick skulls. And, it is nice to have a platform to articulate some stuff I have come to realise (even if belatedly) I have come to believe in.

More to the point, I have been struck by the fact that the curse of 'mansplaining' - men thinking themselves expert in areas they are not - often extends to some ludicrous attitudes concerning women, women's role, and relationships; some of my interventions have been prompted by an exasperated need to put them right, rather than allowing them to carry on sailing through life, freighted by their own wilful and blissful ignorance, and completely certain in the utter strength of their cluelessness.

So, to be honest, I am not all that relationship orientated at all in my 'real' life; when I am working, my dedication to that is total. When I meet people in 'real life', we tend to talk about history, or politics, - or alcohol, or food or travel or whatever - and I am unusually disinterested in, and repelled by, small talk, and the myriad details of others' relationships. Moreover, I am allergic to babies, (although I do like cats and dogs) and wedding talk, and fashion, and celebrity nonsense bores me to tears.

However, I do like history, politics, theatre, books, reading, music, writing, travel, photography, facts (which is why I loved science at school, and seriously contemplated a career in it, to be advised that - as a female - a career as a research scientist or academic would be almost impossible to achieve), food, (both the preparation and the eating), and a great many other things, some of which - wonderfully - we get to discuss in various fora here. (Where else could I discuss Star Trek which I have loved since childhood?)

As for watches, I think the male obsession possibly derives from a mixture of questions arising from the extraordinary mechanical advances in watchmaking - how can you physically craft something which tries to measure time? - along with broader philosophical questions - how can you measure time, which is something I have always found fascinating, added to the fact that watches are considered to be one of the few forms of adornment, or jewellery, that society considers it appropriate for men to wear. My own watch is an Omega Deville, which I have had for seven years; it looks like the watches from the 50s, and 60s, and is plain, elegant and classic in appearance.

I suppose that, in some ways, I see this site as a way to discuss stuff I never - or hardly ever - discuss in the rest of my life. It allows an exploration - not just of the online world, and a community within that - (this is the first online community I had ever joined - for, I joined MR years before I joined LinkedIn or Twitter; besides, I am a lot more restrained on both Twitter and LinkedIn, as I appear there under my own name,) but also, I suppose, of discussions of stuff that I would not normally discuss, or make much time for.

Mind you, when abroad, - and my working environment tends to be exceptionally male - it is funny: I rarely, if ever, discuss my personal life, - not when I am abroad - but male colleagues (usually over a late fourth beer) will insist on discussing theirs with me. However, sometimes, good friendships have developed out of that; most of the friends that I have made over the past 20 years have been male, and have come about from my international work, not the academic world, which is not something I would have expected when I started working in that world.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mobilehaathi
To be honest, I am surprised that this should be something considered of relevance, or interest, to anyone.

Actually, - and this is ironical - and is even odder that men are so determined to try to put people into neat little boxes, and seek to try to define them thus. To be honest, most of the time, I am massively uninterested in people - I wish them well in a benignly indifferent manner, but have no real interest in interacting with the vast majority of them, except in a professional context; give me a book, instead.

Re relationships, it is just that on this site, some completely clueless individuals need to have things explained to them in language that might get through to their thick skulls. And, it is nice to have a platform to articulate some stuff I have come to realise (even if belatedly) I have come to believe in.

More to the point, I have been struck by the fact that the curse of 'mansplaining' - men thinking themselves expert in areas they are not - often extends to some ludicrous attitudes concerning women, women's role, and relationships; some of my interventions have been prompted by an exasperated need to put them right, rather than allowing them to carry on sailing through life, freighted by their own wilful and blissful ignorance, and completely certain in the utter strength of their cluelessness.

So, to be honest, I am not all that relationship orientated at all in my 'real' life; when I am working, my dedication to that is total. When I meet people in 'real life', we tend to talk about history, or politics, - or alcohol, or food or travel or whatever - and I am unusually disinterested in, and repelled by, small talk, and the myriad details of others' relationships. Moreover, I am allergic to babies, (although I do like cats and dogs) and wedding talk, and fashion, and celebrity nonsense bores me to tears.

However, I do like history, politics, theatre, books, reading, music, writing, travel, photography, facts (which is why I loved science at school, and seriously contemplated a career in it, to be advised that - as a female - a career as a research scientist or academic would be almost impossible to achieve), food, (both the preparation and the eating), and a great many other things, some of which - wonderfully - we get to discuss in various fora here. (Where else could I discuss Star Trek which I have loved since childhood?)

As for watches, I think the male obsession possibly derives from a mixture of questions arising from the extraordinary mechanical advances in watchmaking (and broader philosophical equations - how can you measure time, which is something I have always found fascinating), added to the fact that watches are considered of the few forms of adornment, or jewellery, that society considers it appropriate for men to wear. My own watch is an Omega Deville, which I have had for seven years; it looks like the watches from the 50s, and 60s, and is plain, elegant and classic in appearance.

I suppose that, in some ways, I see this site as a way to discuss stuff I never - or hardly ever - discuss in the rest of my life. It allows an exploration - not just of the online world, and a community within that - (this is the first online community I had ever joined - for, I joined MR years before I joined LinkedIn or Twitter; besides, I am a lot more restrained on both Twitter and LinkedIn, as I appear there under my own name,) but also, I suppose, of discussions of stuff that I would not normally discuss, or make much time for.

Mind you, when abroad, - and my working environment tends to be exceptionally male - it is funny: I rarely, if ever, discuss my personal life, - not when I am abroad - but male colleagues (usually over a late fourth beer) will insist on discussing theirs with me. However, sometimes, good friendships have developed out of that; most of the friends that I have made over the past 20 years have been male, and have come about from my international work, not the academic world, which is not something I would have expected when I started working in that world.

Thanks for the well thought out reply. Hope I didn't hit a nerve.

When I mentioned I think of you as relationship-oriented, I meant it in the aspect what motivates you to do things, NOT your desire (or lack of!) to have relationships with people. In other words, you seem to do things for the satisfaction that you obtain from doing it, NOT for the purpose of getting it done or in being the best/fastest. My comment was in the context of being 'task-oriented' versus 'relationship-oriented'. An example - you picked out your Omega partly due to the fact that it has a great reputation and history, but more so for its looks/style and the way it makes you feel. You probably did NOT buy it for the "bling" factor, and you probably couldn't care less what others think about your watch. This is itself a bit of anomaly, as a large majority of those who wear an expensive watch are doing it for the "look at me" status of a $5000 - $20,000 timepiece, except for serious watch enthusiasts. And even some of them drift into the alpha male "my watch is better than your watch" competition.

I will admit, I do tend to try and categorize people, or at least figure out what is under their surface. It stems from my working environment I believe. I work out of my house for a large science/materials company, basically telecommuting to my company headquarters 1,200 miles away. I rarely physically interact with my co-woker or boss. My company has NO presence near me, and as a result, I do not have a lot of the typical work relationships nor face-to-face interactions that most other people have. I have a team of global folks that I have never met, although we talk on the phone multiple times a week and are always on chat. As I can't rely on body language and observation to understand how my team, my boss, my acquaintances are feeling; therefore I am very observational during our phone/web meetings and email discussions. Perhaps too much. That obviously spills into my personal life. One interesting aspect of that is that almost all of my opinions/perceptions of people are based not on looks/appearances, but on their ability to communicate and how they react to situations.

My work environment is primarily female - I have 8 other team members and they are all female, with 5 of them being outside the United States. I also think I am the oldest; it not, then only by a year or two based on hiring date. Although I am not "old' (51), the role I am in tends to attract a younger person and I have noticed that over the years I have become that "seasoned veteran".... <sigh>.
 
Re the Omega, I had been eyeing it - and trying it on occasionally - for several years before I bought it.

Anyway, I loved the simplicity, the clean lines, the understated, classic, elegant appearance, the dauphine hands - and yes, it looks great on my wrist; nevertheless, on a university teacher's salary, I could not have justified buying it. And yes, the reputation, and the enduring appeal of a well made classic crafted by a reputable and distinguished brand, are further attractions.

However, when working abroad, the Omega was well within financial reach, and I have always liked the idea of deferred gratification. Thankfully, it is such an understated, subdued looking watch, that, unless you are 'into' watches, nobody notices it, which is one of the things I also like about it.

And yes, you are right: I like it, and couldn't care less whether others approve of my retro preferences. - this watch is very similar to those classics of the 50s and 60s, and loathe 'bling bling' - a definition which includes some of the bloated and vulgar monstrosities one sees these days sometimes adorning a wrist.

The other thing I like about it is that I bought it for myself because I liked it.

As for the competitive aspect, it holds little interest for me, but it is something that I note that quite a number of men seem prone to judge others on. (As a teenager it used to be music, and musical preferences that you were judged on).

Re 'relationship' orientated (and yes, I did misunderstand what you were trying to convey), rather than 'task-oriented', I think it is a mixture of the satisfaction of doing it plus the challenge of mastering what needs to be known to do it properly which engages me, true, although sometimes doing - or completing - a task well carries its own reward (say, publishing a book, or writing reports, or teaching an enthusiastic and interested class).

Now that I am comfortably ensconced in middle age, and, hilariously, sometimes find myself advising on - or being asked to advise - on 'relationships', I find that without even realising it, (probably in common with many others who are also well on their journey through life), I have learned - absorbed, observed - stuff, much of it stuff that I heartily wish I had known when I was twenty.
 
Last edited:
Today (yesterday now) I've had two coffee's black and have enjoyed them far more than I have before. What I have done is reduce the quantity of the coffee, whilst retaining the full flavour. Usually I make a latte by two espresso shots and lots of milk. An Americano the same with a dash of milk.

Drinking my coffee black had been before just doing that, same amount of coffee but without the milk. Today's efforts have been a revelation, to drink a black coffee before had been an effort, with the reduced amount I get the "mmm, give me more!" Effect.

It's coffee full of flavour, strong (to me) but without the harsh bitter taste. I think I'm onto something!

Today (yesterday now) I've had two coffee's black and have enjoyed them far more than I have before. What I have done is reduce the quantity of the coffee, whilst retaining the full flavour. Usually I make a latte by two espresso shots and lots of milk. An Americano the same with a dash of milk.

Drinking my coffee black had been before just doing that, same amount of coffee but without the milk. Today's efforts have been a revelation, to drink a black coffee before had been an effort, with the reduced amount I get the "mmm, give me more!" Effect.

It's coffee full of flavour, strong (to me) but without the harsh bitter taste. I think I'm onto something!

Can't edit but what I did was reduce the amount of coffee. One tablespoon for a cup as opposed to my usual two.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't edit but what I did was reduce the amount of coffee. One tablespoon for a cup as opposed to my usual two.

I find that this depends on the coffee.

The Ethiopian coffees that I have become increasingly partial to in recent months (years?) are less strong, and roasted more lightly, than more traditional (over-roasted) beans have been.

Anyway, the upshot of this is that you may need to use a little more of them to get the same results; normally, for stronger coffees, I would use a dessertspoon per person (and one for the pot); with my Ethiopian coffee, I'll use a bit more than that.
 
I find that this depends on the coffee.

The Ethiopian coffees that I have become increasingly partial to in recent months (years?) are less strong, and roasted more lightly, than more traditional (over-roasted) beans have been.

Anyway, the upshot of this is that you may need to use a little more of them to get the same results; normally, for stronger coffees, I would use a dessertspoon per person (and one for the pot); with my Ethiopian coffee, I'll use a bit more than that.
Yes, it's an ongoing learning experience. For me, once I find something I like, I stick with it. For example, I always brew my tea (in a cup) for two minutes. My colleagues at work when they discover this (I can always spot their moment of discovery and it's quite funny!) always tease me! I don't find it funny or peculiar at all. If my two minutes produces my perfect cup of tea so be it!

If I find my agreeable black brew of coffee I'll stick with it.
 
I'm not sure if we ever discussed the stovetop units much. Do people with the aluminum models wash it after each use or let a patina develop on the inside, which eventually hardens and won't taste rancid? I looked at them in late November until I bought a stainless steel maker. I went searching for discussions and came across ones in Italian and what I believe was Romanian, whereby a translator I found out that most people simply change the gasket and that's it. They do air out the chamber to prevent white growth. Some say it's mineral deposits but others say it's a type of mold. I'll admit to not liking the aluminum ones, hence the reason I bought SS through a recommendation from @Scepticalscribe during the holiday period.

Edit: Thinking back, I do believe I owned a moka pot at one time or another. Memory's a bit fuzzy, but I'm quite sure I threw it in the trash bin due to disgust after a few months of use. That white growth. I don't recall whether I had a water softening system installed at the time, but recall that issue and a metallic taste. Though common sense now dictates that I wasn't properly following the rules of using and cleaning one.

[doublepost=1464587731][/doublepost]
Yes, it's an ongoing learning experience. For me, once I find something I like, I stick with it. For example, I always brew my tea (in a cup) for two minutes. My colleagues at work when they discover this (I can always spot their moment of discovery and it's quite funny!) always tease me! I don't find it funny or peculiar at all. If my two minutes produces my perfect cup of tea so be it!

If I find my agreeable black brew of coffee I'll stick with it.
That's not at all strange. I brew tea straight in the cup sometimes when I don't feel like getting the teapot out. You won't drink the last 3/4th of an inch, but it does work. I got the idea after being served green tea jasmine blooming balls many years ago. The waitress would keep coming around to fill it up. I may be reaching here, but I distinctly remember an article I read a few years ago where the Japanese do the same with very high quality sencha.
 
Last edited:
Re the Bialetti moka pot, I have always cleaned it thoroughly after each use, (having allowed it to cool down first - it retains heat for a long time and will be very hot when used; therefore, sometimes, you may have to leave it and wash it when you return home) and, if I haven't used it in a while, I will clean it again before use.
 
Re the Bialetti moka pot, I have always cleaned it thoroughly after each use, (having allowed it to cool down first - it retains heat for a long time and will be very hot when used; therefore, sometimes, you may have to leave it and wash it when you return home) and, if I haven't used it in a while, I will clean it again before use.
After you use it you can put it under cold water (that's how it do it....) you should clean it only with water and no soap as it will change the taste of the coffee (plus if you only make coffee with it it is not like it'll get that dirty), and i advise especially when new to make few coffee before drinking some and let them rest in the bialetti for a little....
 
After you use it you can put it under cold water (that's how it do it....) you should clean it only with water and no soap as it will change the taste of the coffee (plus if you only make coffee with it it is not like it'll get that dirty), and i advise especially when new to make few coffee before drinking some and let them rest in the bialetti for a little....

Well, I'm from cold, wet miserable Northern Europe, (although it is sunny today, to my delighted surprise) so I tend to use hot water, to be honest, when I wash it. Can only handle cold water in (high) summer, which tends to last all of three days here, some years....

Apart from the moka pot my godmother gave me, I also bought another espresso pot from Villeroy & Boch; this is a lovely pot, stainless steel on the bottom, and porcelain on top.
[doublepost=1464605481][/doublepost]
I've always just rinsed mine out straight after pouring the coffee under a cold tap.

Yes, but unscrewing the separate parts of the mock pot is not always possible immediately after serving (and drinking) the espresso; that pot is damned hot to touch!
 
Oven mitts are what I use. Actually, if the bottom portion is hot enough, I don't even have to rinse it let alone let it dry. The heat causes whatever moisture within to evaporate. Very similar to using a quality dishwasher that dries your dishes to spotless perfection. I'm almost certain now that with constant use, a patina develops and plugs all the pitting in the aluminum. Provided it's rinsed under water and left to air dry, I doubt there would ever be enough residual oil to go rancid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
An unusual situation for me is one where I have had no coffee for a number of days; I seem to have caught a bad cold, and can only face tea.

I will know that I have recovered when my palate craves coffee again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mgguy
I've always stuck with caffeine while sick. I find that it counteracts the sleepiness certain medications induce and restricts the nasal cavity, so one can easily breathe.
 
I've always stuck with caffeine while sick. I find that it counteracts the sleepiness certain medications induce and restricts the nasal cavity, so one can easily breathe.

Yes, but when one's nasal cavities are already exceedingly restricted, - on account of the heavy cold/borderline flu - this is not something that we - sorry, I - wish to add to.

So, still drinking tea.
 
However...

(anyone who gets that reference wins a prize)

@Scepticalscribe Drinking tea is, clearly, a seditious act engaged in only by some commie, pinko, un-American foreign type!

Fooey! :p

As my grandmother would say...a bi gezundt!

But really, dear friend, I hope you feel well soon.

And now to my favorite subject… me. (narcissism once again rears its ugly head)

For the past year and a half I have not tasted coffee. You can only imagine what passed for coffee in the institutions where I spent almost 6 months in rehab after I very cleverly broke my neck. Needless to say I was certainly not going to drink any of that stuff. Upon returning home it was clear that I could no longer use my espresso equipment and I chose, until a few days ago, to maintain my coffee fast.

About a week ago I decided it was time to break that fast. Since espresso was out of the picture I decided to go with French press. The first thing I had to do was to alter to my expectations and not expect to get espresso taste out of a French press. Having done that, I am once again thrilled to be drinking good coffee and, since I have been free of caffeine for year and a half, quite enjoying the buzz I'm getting off a 10 ounce cup of good coffee.

I have been playing around with two variables… grind and brew time. Contrary to all the instructions I have read online I am currently at a six minute brew time, rather then the apparently universal instruction of four minutes. I have the grind at a point where I only get a tiny amount of grinds at the bottom of my cup. I'm using a Blue Bottle medium roast coffee, but would like something somewhat different so I ordered a dark roast from Intelligentsia.

Okay, I am now soliciting all and any suggestions, instructions, or ideas regarding the production of French press coffee.

And so it begins again…;)
 
Nice to see you again Shrink! Welcome back to the coffee lovers fold! French press was my preferred method as a grad student back in Ottawa Canada in the early 90s where the residence cafeteria served stuff not much better that what you avoided. Haven't used it for years though, except to say I always left it longer than recommended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shrink
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.