Brutal truth? Steve Jobs was a great salesman who got lucky.
And died young.
Steve Jobs made plenty of mistakes while at Apple in the 80s, outside of Apple and with Apple from 1997 onwards.
The most egregious was allowing Eric Schmidt to sit on the board of Apple…
Brutal truth? Steve Jobs was a great salesman who got lucky.
And died young.
I disagree vehemently.
That is all the ultimate consequence of a single historical moment.
This one:
That's the point in time where Apple effectively stopped being the Mac company.
Everything else has been a matter of time.
I agree to a large extent - and this excessive worship of an unpleasant if gifted individual tells me more than is good for the peace of my mind about the capacity of humans to willingly suspend their critical faculties when offered the opportunity for mindless adoration - but will add one or two comments.
I would argue that firstly, Steve Jobs had an eye for what was aesthetically and artistically beautiful - and was able to have this expressed in the field of tech, which was an innovation, - at that stage nobody expected tech to have any sense of aesthetics whatsoever, not least the gloomy nerds who designed the tech.
Secondly, he was a superb synthesiser - he could take ideas, concepts, inventions and fuse them into something workable that would have wide appeal; most of what Apple produced already existed - but not as something that could appeal to a key segment of a mass audience.
Thirdly, he had a keen eye for potential commercial success - for what would work before anyone had even begun to see that a market for that product or device might exist.
Excellent post and I agree completely with you.
From that point on, computers became only a part of what Apple did, and - as time went on - a part that was less and less necessary in term son profit, and only indulged for reasons of prestige and - perhaps - nostalgia.
The truth is Apple no longer needs the computing arm for any reason, and can afford to run it as a loss leader. It doesn't have to perform commercially or in terms of tech reputation, or, as a leading, cutting edge design, it doesn't have to turn a profit, it is not needed to "sell" Apple products any longer.
Indeed, if anything, that old, querulous, cantankerous, self-selected, "elect" that Apple had encouraged to think were members of an esoteric elite of the tech universe, are - these days - a needy nuisance more than anything, their conduct and tone demanding of attention and reassurances that Apple still loves them (it never did), persuading themselves that Apple still needs them (it doesn't), a mindset not unlike a jilted lover.
These days, computers are only one small - and by no means the most important - sector of what a large, powerful, wealthy, international company produces.
As for myself, well, personally, I have greater concerns about the disgraceful use of something approximating to slave labour in China to manufacture Apple computers and products, than I do about whether Apple is quite as cutting edge in the tech field as it used to be.
And the veneration of the Founder is something I have long found repellant.
no headphone jack is hardly a bad thing and soon everybody will remove it...
maybe if jobs was alive we wouldn't have big phones which would be terrible.
What a post. Couldn't agree more.
Indeed, if anything, that old, querulous, cantankerous, self-selected, "elect" that Apple had encouraged to think were members of an esoteric elite of the tech universe, are - these days - a needy nuisance more than anything
Excellent summation. I have had the strong feeling for awhile now that Apple doesn't want/need computers any longer, that at this point they are a niche product, more trouble then they're worth frankly, and will, in time, phase them out of their product lineup completely. Which will, of course, leave a lot of people (like myself) out in the cold, and feeling resentful.I agree to a large extent - and this excessive worship of an unpleasant if gifted individual tells me more than is good for the peace of my mind about the capacity of humans to willingly suspend their critical faculties when offered the opportunity for mindless adoration - but will add one or two comments.
I would argue that firstly, Steve Jobs had an eye for what was aesthetically and artistically beautiful - and was able to have this expressed in the field of tech, which was an innovation; at that stage nobody expected tech to have any sense of aesthetics - or aesthetic appeal - whatsoever, not least the gloomy nerds who designed the tech.
Secondly, he was a superb synthesiser - he could take ideas, concepts, inventions - stuff invented by others - and fuse them into something workable that would have wide appeal; most of what Apple produced already existed - but not as something that could appeal to a key segment of a mass audience, or market.
Thirdly, he had a keen eye for potential commercial success - for what would work before anyone had even begun to see that a market for that product or device might exist.
Excellent post and I agree completely with you.
From that point on, computers became only a part of what Apple did, and - as time went on - a part that was less and less necessary in terms of profit, and only indulged for reasons of prestige and - perhaps - nostalgia.
The truth is Apple no longer needs the computing arm for any reason, and can afford to run it as a loss leader. It doesn't have to perform commercially or in terms of tech reputation, or, as a leading, cutting edge design, it doesn't have to turn a profit, and it is not needed to "sell" Apple products any longer.
Indeed, if anything, that old, querulous, cantankerous, self-selected, "elect" that Apple had encouraged to think were members of an esoteric elite of the tech universe, are - these days - a needy nuisance more than anything, their conduct and tone demanding of attention and reassurances that Apple still loves them (it never did), persuading themselves that Apple still needs them (it doesn't), a mindset not unlike a jilted lover.
These days, computers are only one small - and by no means the most important - sector of what a large, powerful, wealthy, international company produces.
As for myself, well, personally, I have greater concerns about the disgraceful use of something approximating to slave labour in China to manufacture Apple computers and products, than I do about whether Apple is quite as cutting edge in the tech field as it used to be.
And the veneration of the Founder is something I have long found repellant.
no headphone jack is hardly a bad thing and soon everybody will remove it...
maybe if jobs was alive we wouldn't have big phones which would be terrible.
I was pro-Apple with their decision to ax the headphone jack. Then was just getting ready to run a marathon, I had my extended battery and my iphone and headphones that came with the phone for some music. Then I realized I only have 1 lightning port so I had to choose between my GPS or music. I picked music.
I wish Apple had put two lighting ports in there.
Its the inconsistency. Schiller went up on stage and made a case on why the headphone jack is being removed, but fast forward a couple of months and boom, the MBP has a headphone jack. If the port is antiquated and we need something more powerful in 2016/2017 then for Pete's sake don't keep it in the laptop.Exactly.! I genuinely think Apple dropped the ball in this whole headphone jack issue. They should've done more market research. The battery technology is nowhere close for us to go full time wireless just yet.
Its the inconsistency. Schiller went up on stage and made a case on why the headphone jack is being removed, but fast forward a couple of months and boom, the MBP has a headphone jack. If the port is antiquated and we need something more powerful in 2016/2017 then for Pete's sake don't keep it in the laptop.
Space was not the reasons Schiller gave for its removal.I guess you can argue that space is not at as much of a premium on a laptop compared to a smartphone.
As badly as I want to pull away, Android is not a solution for me. I like the Moto phone but the software and I are not playing nicely. The workarounds aren't acceptable. And it's already wonky almost two weeks in.
I had a Moto Droid 2 several years ago and I didn't like it either. I did, however, really enjoy the Nexus 5 I had previously. I only switched because it was my employer's device and I switched jobs.
Essentially, it may be worth a try to check out other Android devices. I hate to say this, but this is the one time fragmentation is beneficial, but also puts a lot of work on the consumer.
I think the people in the Mac Pro, Mac Mini, iMac and MacBook Pro forums would disagree with you. Heck even the MBP was slow in getting released. Apple's problems is not related to rushing products out the door.I really wish Apple would slow down
I think the people in the Mac Pro, Mac Mini, iMac and MacBook Pro forums would disagree with you. Heck even the MBP was slow in getting released. Apple's problems is not related to rushing products out the door.
Agreed. I remember my iPhone 6s being bricked after upgrading OTA to iOS 10, I think it was. I never expected that to happen and it caused me to change my habits - I'll wait at least a month before upgrading OTA from now on.Politely saying, rushing software out the door, yes sir that is a problem.
I think folks who dealt with bricked iPad Pros 9.7 etc. might disagree with your comment.
But in terms of hardware, you are right.
I see your point - yeah there's been times where the software is not as stable or had that unfinished look and feel.Politely saying, rushing software out the door, yes sir that is a problem.
Maybe you can go here to lament, and you'll feel better:This has been on my mind for a while. No headphone port, latest macbook pro disaster countless mistakes apple has made ever since the great Steve Jobs passed. If he were still alive Apple would make way better decisions and not make crucial mistakes.