most sites i goto i never scroll horizontally, just vertically.
I usually have to fit multiple things on one screen more than a whole page/thread of MR. 1680x1050 screen please apple. READ: side by side not vertical. It is hard to work with just 1 1280x854 screen as I am used to the PB screen + 1280x1024 which means 2-4 documents side by side easily and I can turn the scale factor down to 75% and still read it. I could probably get buy with 1 20" or a 13-15" 1680x1050 laptop.
Yeah, the complete difference in portability got nothin' on the 168 pixels.
actually 172032 pixels.
For me a 15 inch is worth the size and weight. I carried my PB to school and back home every day until I was homeschooled.
The difference between my PB and my dad's dell (or MacBook)is less though. only 69120 pixels.
Boy I wish I had a 1680*1050 screen on my PB (and 4-8 GB RAM and a Core 2 Duo
)
I wish I could mod a NVIDIA mini and a 1680x1050 screen into a second generation MBP case.
Before anybody asks I did not stop going to school because I was sick of carrying my PB to school. If I was I would have bought a first gen MBA once they were dropped in price to $999 on the refurb store. I quit school after the refurb MBA was $999.
Dell sells 1920x1200 15 inchers so why doesn't Apple.
I have never had anything smaller than 14 inch. If I had of had a <12 I might change my mind but I do not think I would. 1280x800 on 10 inch is the same size as 1920x1200 on 15 inch (which I can read). 1680x1050 on 13 inch seems like the prefect balance. I would never buy a 17 inch though as I can read the same resolution of 17's (1920x1200) on a 15 so there is no point for a 17 inch in my opinion unless you cannot see.
Grandma's 17 inch dell is 17 inch so she can see 1280x800 which I can read on 10".