Very surprised What was your scenarios of usage?I have returned base 16” M1 Pro. 16 GB uniffied RAM was not enough for casual usage
Very surprised What was your scenarios of usage?I have returned base 16” M1 Pro. 16 GB uniffied RAM was not enough for casual usage
agree....that sentiment not often found here...16gb seems to be enough for most appsVery surprised What was your scenarios of usage?
I agree. I am still using a 2014” 15 MacBook Pro 8 years later, not to be thrifty but because it simply just worked. It’s done really well but I honestly should’ve upgraded in 2021 because of the lack of updates, battery, etc. I’m still using it and I’ve pushed it hard.Yep, that is one strategy all right that apparently fits your use case. Others pride themselves on keeping machines for 8 years considering themselves thrifty. And some of us have other ways of using our time than fretting over such minutia, life is short. Get the specced up machine and move on without worry. Call me a moron if you want, but yeah its my money to spend as I want, and I want to be able to use my computer in ways I can't even predict now without worrying.
I think buying two machines to 'test drive them' with the intent to return one is sketchy. Bottom line is, sure, Apple allows that, but it costs Apple and what costs Apple is passed on to all of us. So I am subsidizing your right to test drive without you doing the work of reading reviews that say the same thing so you could have just settled on the one beforehand. Guess that does make me a moron lol.
The MBP base configs still have fast drives, even at "only" 3 GB/sec. It is slower than the previous M1 at 5 GB/sec. But many will not even notice since one the app is loaded and running the remainder of execution is faster. The only caveat However, if a 1/2 sec or so slower loading an app bothers someone, they can go from 512GB to 1 TB for $200.The idea sounds good but is this still a good strategy given that Apple changed the game by punishing those who buy the base model with slower SSD which performs worse than that of the corresponding previous generation. If trade-in with Apple 2-3 years later, I wonder if we lose more money buying the base models vs. the next step-up model with a faster SSD.
For the MBP 16" base config, do I need to be concerned about swap/page related issue?The MBP base configs still have fast drives, even at "only" 3 GB/sec. It is slower than the previous M1 at 5 GB/sec. But many will not even notice since one the app is loaded and running the remainder of execution is faster. The only caveat However, if a 1/2 sec or so slower loading an app bothers someone, they can go from 512GB to 1 TB for $200.
I believe the 14 and 16 M2 both have the single drive module which causes the slower speed. When you go to 1TB there are 2 modules.For the MBP 16" base config, do I need to be concerned about swap/page related issue?
I don’t have enough experience with Silicon Mac. In Intel Mac Era, I only bought 16GB-1TB models for over ten years.
This M2 MBP may be just a stepping stone until the 3mm M3 arrival. If the current model had a 3mm M3 chip, I would just go for 1TB.