Just picked one up. It’s good to be back on a 1080p large screen.
Just picked one up. It’s good to be back on a 1080p large screen.
Not surprising. Why bother making a better screen on a phone $200-$300 dollars cheaper?Interestingly that while reviewing the 13 Pro Max (skip to 9:13 mark), he notes that while recording the screen at 240 fps he does not detect flicker and asks if it could possibly be flicker free. This is stark contrast to what he said during the 13 and 13 mini reviews.
But the average person doesn’t even know PWM exists. So in this context, it would almost be like Apple was trying to make that extra money off of PWM sufferers and I’m not certain they even know it exists. If they do, they certainly aren’t acknowledging it.Not surprising. Why bother making a better screen on a phone $200-$300 dollars cheaper?
Confirmed: Pro models are either flicker-free or operating at a higher refresh rate that can’t be caught on camera at 240Hz slo-mo. No flicker visible in the video.Interestingly that while reviewing the 13 Pro Max (skip to 9:13 mark), he notes that while recording the screen at 240 fps he does not detect flicker and asks if it could possibly be flicker free. This is stark contrast to what he said during the 13 and 13 mini reviews.
I will let you guys know tomorrow but I’m beginning to believe this is the year that we’ll be able to get back on the iPhone upgrade cycle.Flicker visible on a 240fps slow mo video clip only means it’s out of sync with the camera shutter. If the flicker is bumped up (or down) a few hz to sync with the 240FPS shutter - you can’t see the flickering on the video.
The camera not being able to see flickering with a slow mo clip means nothing far as potential eye strain is concerned.
But we’ll all find out for real when people actually start using the phone and report back their findings.
I guess they don’t care, then, and figure the ones suffering are willing to pay $$$ for it.But the average person doesn’t even know PWM exists. So in this context, it would almost be like Apple was trying to make that extra money off of PWM sufferers and I’m not certain they even know it exists. If they do, they certainly aren’t acknowledging it.
And how about the regular Pro?
I absolutely agree. Night mode may save my battery, but it's murder on my eyes. I have that turned off everywhere.Just a reminder for all you PWM test mules who are getting your iPhone 13s tomorrow…
My experience with a non PWM LCD plus iPhone (401 ppi) is that for me anyway, using Dark Mode makes my eyes more burny feeling after a few hours compared to using regular White Mode — so take that into consideration.
It may have something to do with pupil dilation: the brighter the overall screen, the easier it is for the eyes to focus because pupils are smaller.
I don’t need it either and also both Pros are heavy bricks. 13 pro is even heavier than 11…. for gods shake.I’m worried now since I bought a 13. I don’t want to pay for a Pro when I don’t need it otherwise. Hopefully the rate is higher on the 13 than the X and won’t bother me as much as the X.
Another user on the forum measured it at 480Hz on iPhone 13 Pro Max, which would still be a major improvement. However I’d wait for Notebookcheck to know for sure what the rate is.
Good enough for me. OLED iPhone’s usually flickered like crazy with slo-mo video. This seems like the first generation where Apple has made a meaningful improvement.Here is the video for the 13 Pro. 7:58 slow motion with the 12 Pro:
The same difference like on the pro max
Same as pro maxSo does the 13 Pro have it? Only seen info on the 13 Pro Max
great newsSame as pro max