Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
this is the PCIe SSD you are after.

1.4GB/s each way.

I'm aware of the Z-drive, they even have a 2TB version, but the price makes this drive uninteresting for most users.
There are even faster drives out there with 5GB/s transfer speeds and up to 6TB.

But the RevoDrive X2 are the only ones that are affordable by the majority of consumer Mac Pro users. I don't think that there are much users that can justify a drive that is worth more than the whole computer.
 
I'm aware of the Z-drive, they even have a 2TB version, but the price makes this drive uninteresting for most users.
There are even faster drives out there with 5GB/s transfer speeds and up to 6TB.

But the RevoDrive X2 are the only ones that are affordable by the majority of consumer Mac Pro users. I don't think that there are much users that can justify a drive that is worth more than the whole computer.

i wasnt aware of the 5TB/s ones, thats well impressive :)

any links/specs to these? i know some people that would use them in their business environment ;)
 
I'm aware of the Z-drive, they even have a 2TB version, but the price makes this drive uninteresting for most users.
There are even faster drives out there with 5GB/s transfer speeds and up to 6TB.

But the RevoDrive X2 are the only ones that are affordable by the majority of consumer Mac Pro users. I don't think that there are much users that can justify a drive that is worth more than the whole computer.

Does the revodrive x2 boot for mac osx? I went on ocz's site and the ocz card does not support osx.

http://www.ocztechnology.com/res/manuals/OCZ_RevoDrive_X2_Product_sheet_1.pdf
 
I m configuring a similar workstation
2.8 ghz quad core (2010)
8 or 16 gb ram ( still doubting)
120 vertex 2 ssd boot drive
120 vertex 2 ssd scratch disc ( Photoshop)

I basically work Photoshop and edit with capture One. I work with PS files up to 1 gb with layers.
For now I have only the 3 gb and it is not very fast.

I don't really how the Raid0 works? And what benefit it gives?
Can somebody explain?
How can I max my speed even more ?
Thanks!
 
It seems like stripping the SSDs would add performance. The Mac Pro baseline includes a Nehalem processor with Intel's QuickPath Interface. The standard SSDs can access as 223 MB/s while the QPI supports upto 20 GB/s. So, the processor at least has the throughput to get the data to/from the chip (this used to be the major bottleneck).

Does anyone else find it funny that Intel has finally switched over to an on-board memory controller after years of making fun of AMD for having one?
 
I m configuring a similar workstation
2.8 ghz quad core (2010)
8 or 16 gb ram ( still doubting)
120 vertex 2 ssd boot drive
120 vertex 2 ssd scratch disc ( Photoshop)

I basically work Photoshop and edit with capture One. I work with PS files up to 1 gb with layers.
For now I have only the 3 gb and it is not very fast.

I don't really how the Raid0 works? And what benefit it gives?
Can somebody explain?
How can I max my speed even more ?
Thanks!

Hello and thanks for posting ;)

You are the first one with a similar hardware.
I have the same MAC PRO but use the OCZ 60GB drives but at 10GB RAM
so our speed is mostly the same.

RAID0 simply multiplies your read/write speed.
Here is a complete but boring video on how to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U41beKVajao

using photoshop like you do might give some advantages with a having the second drive as your scratch disc (I am not sure)

I would say if you dont mind installing OSX a couple times - try it like you currently have it and test, then RAID0 your 2 SSD's and see if the performance is different.

Please post your speed results from www.xbench.com
 
Thanks 300 billon
I read that raid0 doesn't work on ssd, only on mechanical drives, is that right?
I will give you the speed Rate as soon as I get my ssd and ram.


Here is a complete but boring video on how to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U41beKVajao

using photoshop like you do might give some advantages with a having the second drive as your scratch disc (I am not sure)

I would say if you dont mind installing OSX a couple times - try it like you currently have it and test, then RAID0 your 2 SSD's and see if the performance is different.

Please post your speed results from www.xbench.com[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
I dream of the day when people stop judging a computers speed based on how fast it boots.....

True. The only time either of mine reboot is to install the next point update! Uptime is measured in months, not hours.

Also, who needs more than 300MB/sec read or write?

99% of users don't need that, your very, very rarely reading and writing data at that kind of volume.

Even I personally don't transfer data at that kind of speeds and I regard myself as a high-end user compared to everyone I know.

SSD sequentials are NOT the be-all and end-all of performance computing for 99% of people.
 
SSD sequentials are NOT the be-all and end-all of performance computing for 99% of people.

They certainly are not. Random speeds, however, are beneficial for all users. Unfortunately they don't scale as the sequential speeds do, which is why a single SSD for the OS is the sweet spot.
 
I wish my Mac Pro booted in 11 seconds… oh wait it doesn't really matter since I never shut down my computer. :rolleyes:
 
The fastest Mac Pro that I could imagine would be this:

• Dual 3.46GHz 6-core X5690 Processors (12-core)
• 64GB of OWC 1333MHz RAM
• Quad-OWC Mercury Pro Extreme RE RAID-0 bootable Array
• ATI Radeon 5870

That system there would be pretty much the fastest, highest performance rig possible for a Mac Pro, currently, that I can think of.

You can also build this system for under $10k, or even cheaper with less RAM if you don't need 64GB of RAM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.